The Register MS Paid-for 'Articles' (Ads) Seem to be LLM Slop Again
Hours ago:
When I first read through it - and I did it carefully - that seemed very much like slop (bland and mostly idiotic), so I've checked:
And again:
The author has no other output, so that's a red flag right there:
The Register MS might be at it again. By the looks of it, they use a one-time (disposable) author for a paid puff piece and it does not appear to have been composed by a human being.
If it's true that The Register MS is resorting to these marketing tactics, will they later delete the evidence (as they did months ago)? █