Google "Intelligence": Despite Slam-Dunk or "Smoking Gun" Proof, Drug Abuse in EPO Leadership is "Unverified Allegations"
Even when the EPO takes action in secret: (already leaked)
Identification is indisputable, but when the media "conspires" to NOT cover something (it admits this to be true over the telephone) Google is left "knowing" of only one source:
And then it's considered "unverified" (because after a decades-long campaign of SLAPPs nobody dares mention it):
Google's slop (so-called 'AI') lacks intelligence. It's just a parrot - a form of large-scale plagiarist or rewriter of other people's work - which bases words on statistics.
As long as all the mainstream media deliberately ignores EPO strikes or substance abuse inside the EPO we can assume that "mainstream" slop will 'conclude' neither has ever happened.
This also shows how co-called 'AI' companies control the narrative - typically in a self-serving way that culls dissent and hides high-level abuse. Why again does the EPO allow its judges to defer to Microsoft (US) slop? Conflict of interest all over this. █