The Corrupt Lecture the Non-Corrupt - Part VII - Secrecy at the EPO (Regarding Cocaine and Nepotism) Has Undermined Trust in Management
They talk about sharing information and preach frankness while the high official or President keeps even managers in the dark (about cocaine) for 6 weeks!
In the first part, second part, third part, fourth part, fifth part, and the sixth part we showed that "ethics" at the EPO is sometimes that unethical, corrupt (sometimes drug-addicted) managers lecture about if not impose on ordinary staff.
In the last part we explained that they kept secret from everyone what went on with "Cocaine Communication Manager", who was recently reinstated by his sister's romantic partner, António Campinos, the EPO's President. This is rogue politics at a time when the Spanish Prime Minister's wife is charged for crimes.
Europe's status (or reputation) as a civilised continent is at stake.
How much longer can Campinos survive at the Office? Every passing day is a growing liability to Europe's second-largest institution.
It's already corroding trust inside the institution. No manager can trust Campinos, who treats cocaine and arrests like they're not important at all.
Why did it take Senior Management 6 weeks (not until 11 November 2025) to inform staff of his replacement?
Insiders genuinely wonder.
Any other organisation or employer would have offered some sort of explanation to their staff, if one of theirs was under arrest. We need to ask ourselves why did the Senior Management not do anything?
Insiders of the EPO are run by what some of them call "Mafia" because the behaviour sometimes seems indistinguishable.
If Europe's second-largest institution is run by the "Alicante Mafia", does this mean that other key European institutions are "Mafia"? And if Europe's second-largest institution is not even brought up by European politicians (not anymore), does this mean it's considered acceptable? █