SLAPP Censorship - Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They Know and Don't Know About Death Threats They Receive
posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jun 10, 2026,
updated Jun 11, 2026

We've been out of Town
(Manchester) from very early in the morning (in order
to gleefully celebrate an important anniversary) and did not
return until after 10PM at night only to receive patronising
letters sent on behalf of the
Serial Strangler from Microsoft. Remember that a lot
of the SLAPPs or SLAPPing activities started
at around the same time he was arrested in the US (in
his dad's home, where he lived). Weeks earlier we had written
several exclusive articles about his likely fraudulent
dealings with the CEO of Microsoft's GitHub, who soon lost his job
there (he never got a job of a similar status after that; he became
unemployed for about 4 years). We gave a
full timeline of events back in April and shared the same with
the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) - a topic we
shall revisit when the time is more suitable (ministers
are on it; let them take precedence and lead because they know
SRA sucks).
To be more transparent and clear on this whole affair, the
Serial Strangler from Microsoft isn't a new problem. He spent a lot
of time
begging me and
sent his US attorney to effectively admit that he had been charged
with strangulation. He later attempted to
make me "generous" offers or veiled threats (after several
more threats, spanning years, then months apart).
More clarifications are well overdue.
To be clear, for many or at least several (3) years
already Garrett used Graveley as his "legal" attack dog
(speaking
of dogs). Graveley would always attack days or hours me after
Garrett got in legal trouble/impasse, such as the counterclaims
[1,
2].
Mark Lewis said this was very abundantly obvious and said the
SRA must act. Do people want more information about this? Stay
tuned then, we'll present lots more material about the overlap and
connections between Graveley and Garrett in the future. They're
almost inseparable in terms of their behaviour, not just
professional affiliations, personal/social circles, places of work,
and legal team. See
"Garrett and Graveley Cases Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team
Can Barely Even Distinguish" and
"Based on Their Particulars of Claims, Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Seem Like the Same Person (Exactly Same Words Used,
Sloppily Recycled)".
This is not new. This
first SLAPP started in 2021 (by Garrett, coinciding with
Graveley's arrest) and a formal case started in 2024. The
aggressors and Garrett already confessed under sworn oath (I
interrogated him directly) that Graveley filed this case as he
did... because of him, Garrett. Garrett basically invited
this. That also meant
they had both repeatedly made false statements to several
High Court judges (with "statements of truth" signed). There is
legal liability assigned to that, but holding them legally
accountable is hard when they're
sheltered in another continent. When I pointed this out in
public I began receiving death threats (several in the
course of months) - threats that only Garrett, Graveley, or their
legal team could make (based on the contents and the demands).
Garrett then
instructed his lawyers to threaten to put my wife in prison because
his own wife kept calling him "rapist" (his
response to that was revealing) and then Graveley showed up
again. At the same time he resorted to harassment by proxy/process
- i.e. the usual from him.
Their artificial posturing about those actions being
independent/separate cases is refuted by the cross-examination (in
the trial's transcripts). Their artificial posturing about the
threats are likewise facetious at best. They're not denying this;
they do gymnastics with words now, trying to lecture me on what I
know or don't know about the death threats (if they saw these, then
it came from them; if they didn't, how they do they know?).
As stated before, we've identified at least 12 grounds upon
which Brett Wilson LLP is itself in contempt of court. Do readers
want the list? Stay tuned.
I already told them, via
the person they sent to our doorstep this week, that they are
under an active police investigation.
I've since then spoken to several more cops who agree that what
they did was not legal. They likely breached several laws this week
and I gave a description of the person who did this (the
police asked for that).
In short, they work for brutes who physically assault women and
want some women dead. Also, as they are aware, we reported them to
the police for likely illegal behavior. Most recent incident was
less than 3 days ago. For them to trivialise the matter (like they
make threats
to punch people seem like "jokes") is to affirm our
criticism of their profound attitudinal problem.
No wonder so many women quit the firm (they'd rather be
unemployed) while it went on. This hub of toxic masculinity needs a
proper look by the new SRA chief, who is female for a change.
█
Previously:
| 2026-03-03 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No.
KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell |
| 2026-03-04 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed
Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted
Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-03-05 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth
Breakdown |
| 2026-03-06 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s
Version of Events and Narrative |
| 2026-03-07 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a
Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be
One |
| 2026-03-08 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally
Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had
Been Subjected to Similar Abuse |
| 2026-03-09 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the
Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide
Embarrassing Facts |
| 2026-03-10 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of
UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass
Surveillance) |
| 2026-03-11 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister
Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid
Well Over $200,000 to 'Speak' or 'Cover' for) |
| 2026-03-12 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public
Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn't About Justice,
It's About Censorship |
| 2026-03-13 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor
His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today |
| 2026-03-14 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead
of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits
(Funded by Third Parties) as 'Revenge' for Exposing Crimes |
| 2026-03-15 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of
Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations |
| 2026-03-16 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive
Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation
Buddy Garrett Did Cause "Serious Harm" |
| 2026-03-17 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who
Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public
Apologies to These Men |
| 2026-03-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars
of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines |
| 2026-03-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and
Explaining Techrights' Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC)
Network |
| 2026-03-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of
Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People
Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade |
| 2026-03-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding
Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices
That Uphold Real National Security |
| 2026-03-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for
Tough Questions in Cross-Examination |
| 2026-03-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and
to GAFAM Funding |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 21 Out of 200: It's About Behaviour Online,
Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers
and Two Barristers |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People
Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC
and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles) |
| 2026-03-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for
2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to 'Break the
Bank' in Pursuit of "Revenge" |
| 2026-03-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett
Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife's Lawsuit Against
Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed) |
| 2026-03-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett
Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter |
| 2026-03-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and
Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You
Yourself Sent! |
| 2026-03-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to
Hide From Consequences |
| 2026-03-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for
Impersonation and Worse |
| 2026-03-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won't Go
Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control
Media |
| 2026-04-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse
to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its
Cybercrime Unit |
| 2026-04-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of
Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile 'Targets' of
Garrett |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious
Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to
by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and
I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our
Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too |
| 2026-04-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of
Transparency, Illuminating Garrett's and Graveley's 'Tag-Team' Act,
Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts
to Hide Bad Behaviour |
| 2026-04-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound
Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and
Editing 10 Pages |
| 2026-04-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a
Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the
Reporter in Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion
Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation
Against Critics |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+
Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another
Continent |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett
and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?) |
| 2026-04-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous
Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12
Months) |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for
US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging
That Publishing Unflattering Information is a 'Privacy'
Issue |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic
Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets
"Plausible Deniability" |
| 2026-04-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate
Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake) |
| 2026-04-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
'Copypasta' Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change 'T' to
't') |
| 2026-04-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases
Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish
(Full Timeline) |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley's Attorney
Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did,
However, Pay Local Officials |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not
Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third
Parties |
| 2026-04-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who
Tell Women to Kill Themselves |
| 2026-04-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case,
Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Barristers |
| 2026-04-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm
Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler
From Microsoft |
| 2026-04-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means
to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in
Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar
Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End |
| 2026-04-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex
Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the
Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire
Office/Team) |
| 2026-04-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin
Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and
5RB |
| 2026-04-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for
Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft) |
| 2026-04-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP's
Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley |
| 2026-04-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like
Photocopies! |
| 2026-04-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs
Superficially 'Enforceable' in the UK, Using Threats |
| 2026-04-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex
Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is
"Reckless" and "Malicious", According to His 'Hired Guns' in
London |
| 2026-04-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at
Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is "Malice" |
| 2026-04-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must
Understand That Reporting Women's Issues in the United States of
America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible |
| 2026-04-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue
Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible
Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden |
| 2026-05-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down
Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could
Do This in One Minute) |
| 2026-05-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated
Threats (to "Shut Down" My "Existence" While Mentioning My Wife
Too) |
| 2026-05-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All
Along) |
| 2026-05-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal
Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy
Violation |
| 2026-05-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Against My Wife and I Assert 'Distress', But It Was Just a
Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears) |
| 2026-05-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars
of Claims, Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same
Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled) |
| 2026-05-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those
Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett's Plea for Apology |
| 2026-05-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett's (Pure 'Copy-paste',
Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!) |
| 2026-05-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of
Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for
Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett |
| 2026-05-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and
Liable for Lies |
| 2026-05-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 ("Tag-Teaming" Against
Bloggers in Another Continent) |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit
Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in
Another Continent |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable,
Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court
Judges About What They Did |
| 2026-05-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United
Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by
"Hired Guns") |
| 2026-05-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to
Handle Women (Except to Attack Them) |
| 2026-05-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the
Truth About Graveley and Garrett's Abuse of Processes, Stacking
Dockets |
| 2026-05-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100
KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of
Legal Papers Sent to Us) |
| 2026-05-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to
Meet a Judge's Deadline, Microsoft's Graveley Had Garrett's Lawyers
Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear
About My Position |
| 2026-05-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not
Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the
Family) |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 82 Out of 200: British Government
Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But
for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate
Power) |
| 2026-05-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against
SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers) |
| 2026-05-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom's Rating
for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better |
| 2026-05-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on
Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent
(Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies) |
| 2026-05-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice |
| 2026-05-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming
Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence
Them |
| 2026-05-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction,
That's Why Transparency is Paramount |
| 2026-05-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His
Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only
Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information |
| 2026-05-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of
Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by
Americans) |
| 2026-05-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned
"On" and "Off" Like a Faucet |
| 2026-05-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless
Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-06-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett's
Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His
Defence Yet! |
| 2026-06-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of
Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women |
| 2026-06-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death
Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to
People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill
Themselves |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the
Simple Observable Fact He's Closely Connected to the Microsofter
Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and
Worse) |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real
Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About
Microsoft's Bug Doors/Back Doors |
| 2026-06-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to
Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs
as SLAPP Clients) |
| 2026-06-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of
the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to
Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to
Attribute) |
| 2026-06-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They
Don't Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women |
| 2026-06-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day
Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really
Happened |