SLAPP Censorship - Part 134 Out of 200: What "Majority Rules" Tell Us About the Litigant
posted by Roy Schestowitz on Jul 30, 2026,
updated Jul 30, 2026
The overconfident man who puts Microsoft locks on Linux and did not even
show up for his own hearing (despite being in London
at the very same time) is trying to distort the
facts while in no way contradicting our formal statement, which was composed in
simple terms without having to rely on legalese or lawyers. He's
entitled to his views (of
course!) and his solicitors likely mislead him so as to
embellish everything (so that he and
his sponsors keep paying the solicitors and barrister). This
isn't a matter of "accentuating the positive", as some of the words
uttered are referring to entirely made up things! Maybe he is
hallucinating or maybe people who actually went to the
hearing told him lies; had he attended, he would not sound so
foolish and dishonest. Was he afraid to face us after being
traumatised (like his barrister insinuated) last year?
Nevertheless, we press on with this series. It was paused the
day (or night) we travelled to London and we've since then got on
with new series. We'll advance with them at a pace we deem suitable
- averting information overload or a lack of prerequire/dependent
information.
On Majority Rules
So today we talk about "Majority
Rules", which aren't really rules but observations (like
Godwin's Law is not an actual law but an explanation or mere
observation of expectations). We will merely observe what people
out there say about the litigant who is clearly having (anti)social
problems, even with his own family (apparently even his own
parents, according to his spouse!). Look at the legal team he has
chosen, both the law firm and the barrister; they're
misogynists. Money first. Thus, they're compatible with his
worldview. He did not blink before filing a lawsuit against women
[1,
2] and earlier this month he attempted a "divide-and-conquer"
against me and my wife. They attempted to negotiate with my wife in
isolation.
In a modern, enlightened society, holding spouses accountable
for someone else's deeds is regarded as anarchic. In the UK we call
that "Victorian". Victoria died very many years ago.
We'll get back to anarchic behaviour later on.
Conduct of the Legal Team
In the case of the barrister, it was pointed out to me that he
was clearly and intentionally timewasting - a common practice by
the copy-pasting barrister, who instead of respecting the time
allocated for the other side (in order to weigh in, to reply to
claims) is trying to run out the
clock. His copy-pasting is the same. He essentially copy-pasted
about 70-80% of Garrett's claims to make up or draw up Graveley's,
which then necessarily means repetition and timewasting
for the defendant (accused entity), which is a Litigant in Person.
They pile up over 1,000 pages for an application that can be
trivial (and for which less than 10 pages may suffice). Trials then
become gish-gallops. Any signal is drowned out in quantities of
material, including needless repetitions and slop (some of
Garrett's allegations of breaches were computer-generated
malarkey; all of them failed!). What a waste of the Court's
time. Guess who pays the salaries.
By misusing the time, not respecting the Court, upsetting the
judge, and in the process harming our animals (that waited to be
fed) they only reaffirmed
what I wrote about "serious harm to our fish, not to mention
the birds we feed".
That is aside from bullying communications (they act like
bullies towards other lawyers, not just
our past representative).
Apparently, dating back to 2024, they had already become
notorious for this. Don't underestimate
what they would do to "win".
Americans Costing the British Taxpayers Hundreds of
Thousands of Pounds
They are also wasting court staff's time (taxpayers), as noted
by the chief media judge last year. She said it was a waste of the
court's money. They cost everyone a lot, and also Legal Aid
funds (taxpayers) on behalf of their abusive American
clients. We'll probably tackle this at a later point. Our
Ministers (still
surviving the recent shuffle) are duly informed [1,
2] and kept in the loop.
Making British Taxpayers Pay for American Toxicity
Speaking of Americans (like the one who lives in Texas and gets
arrested there), see what peers in America say about Garrett this
month.
This is an American, Microsoft Lunduke, on Garrett being joyous
with violence:
He
relishes in simulated murder of a living person in
America:
"Burn him!"
Stay classy.
While asking the state to put in prison a woman -
in a state and continent so away from him (California and UK
are very far apart).
Classy Garrett.
As a reader put it earlier this month, Garrett "is still walking
around unarrested" and he is working with a
strangler arrested and charged for it,
according to his own American attorney. Very classy.
Garrett in his own words:
Maybe his own behaviour is the issue, not what people say about
him (to warn other people).
In Twitter alone (x.com, owned by the person burned for
"pleasure") the video and tweet received about 45,000 impressions
as of today. We can imagine much more in YouTube, TikTok etc.
As someone put
it, sarcastically: "totally normal adult
behavior."
He has long had this
sick fetish/obsession with violence.
His own spouse talking about him earlier this month, after
saying he broke their puppy's limb/s:
And that's what reporting is - alerting the general public.
Impulsive, irrational and abusive persons are a threat to civil
society and need to be recognised as such.
This is his own spouse speaking;
they are technically still married. The National Archive now
has recorded (in an annex) what his spouse said about him.
Instead of trying to become a better person he is spending
years, 24/7, stalking me in IRC in pursuit of dirt (he is
still doing that,
according to his solicitors). I think he is deeply obsessed...
and merely pointing this out and explaining what he did is a form
of public service.
As a side note or after-note (or afterthought), it's not clear
if he recently lost his job. Why are we saying so?
1. Changed his profile in two social control media sites to
not say "NVIDIA" anymore and to add some disclosure that
might as well refer to berkeley.edu rather than NVIDIA:
2. After finding "pleasure" in burning an effigy of what is
likely NVIDIA's biggest client (as an individual):
3. His blog in Wayback Machine earlier this month:
Compared to now:
So he changed at least 3 sites to not say that he
works in NVIDIA.
Here he is with projection tactics about "rapists", picking on
the man whom he envies so much (he is obsessed with him and also
with me, which is why he still follows me around 24/7,
based on his own solicitors). Mentions "rapists" again:
Like his President in the US saying he is cracking down on
pedophiles in order to distract from his own deep ties to
Jeffrey Epstein.
“If you point one finger, there are 3 more pointing back at
you”
Garrett became exceptionally quiet for nearly a week after the
NVIDIA "incident"; to be clear, this is not the fault of Microsoft
Lunduke but of this man having a very big mouth - running his fouls
mouth and attending bizarre events of booze and rituals, akin to
Burning Man (but burning effigies of real living people).
Garrett might try to accuse Microsoft Lunduke of causing him
problems with his employer (or former employer), but Garrett would
be a complete hypocrite to make such an accusation because this is
precisely what Garrett has been doing for well over a decade! He is
siccing online mobs in social control media, trying to get people
fired. He names people's employers with the clear intention of
trying to cause them to lose their livelihood. This is something
that various people have
been documenting.
Does Garrett still work at NVIDIA? Who knows... 3 options: 1) he
got sacked (some large client like xAI making an ultimatum like,
"fire him or the mega-contract gets cancelled"); 2) he proactively
hid this commercial association, realising what utterly foolish
things he had published; 3) he got reprimanded by the boss and went
into "damage control" mode, hence a week of silence.
Garrett wasn't a "clean" person when NVIDIA offered him a job
and it's safe to assume NVIDIA was aware of what the spouse said
and how much of a liability this can be (or become).
Garrett's precarious situation right now is no excuse for his
outbursts against his critics, including against his spouse (which
he is trying to discredit in secret). People who still
believe that he advocates for the LGBT+ community aren't paying
close enough attention (or only selective attention).
For Garrett, the social media "spheres" are fast becoming a risk
and liability, with almost 50k views combined just in Twitter
(associating his employer with violent rituals). Garrett's issue
right now isn't us but Microsoft Lunduke with his Twitter rants,
not counting his site, Substack, YouTube, and numerous other social
control media platforms.
Garrett is his own worst enemy; clearly he is good at damaging
his own name, then he tries to blame people who call him out on his
highly toxic behaviour. █
Previous Parts:
|
|
| 2026-03-03 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No.
KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell |
| 2026-03-04 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed
Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted
Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-03-05 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth
Breakdown |
| 2026-03-06 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s
Version of Events and Narrative |
| 2026-03-07 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a
Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be
One |
| 2026-03-08 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally
Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had
Been Subjected to Similar Abuse |
| 2026-03-09 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the
Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide
Embarrassing Facts |
| 2026-03-10 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of
UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass
Surveillance) |
| 2026-03-11 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister
Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid
Well Over $200,000 to 'Speak' or 'Cover' for) |
| 2026-03-12 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public
Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn't About Justice,
It's About Censorship |
| 2026-03-13 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor
His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today |
| 2026-03-14 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead
of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits
(Funded by Third Parties) as 'Revenge' for Exposing Crimes |
| 2026-03-15 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of
Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations |
| 2026-03-16 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive
Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation
Buddy Garrett Did Cause "Serious Harm" |
| 2026-03-17 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who
Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public
Apologies to These Men |
| 2026-03-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars
of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines |
| 2026-03-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and
Explaining Techrights' Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC)
Network |
| 2026-03-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of
Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People
Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade |
| 2026-03-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding
Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices
That Uphold Real National Security |
| 2026-03-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for
Tough Questions in Cross-Examination |
| 2026-03-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and
to GAFAM Funding |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 21 Out of 200: It's About Behaviour Online,
Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers
and Two Barristers |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People
Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC
and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles) |
| 2026-03-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for
2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to 'Break the
Bank' in Pursuit of "Revenge" |
| 2026-03-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett
Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife's Lawsuit Against
Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed) |
| 2026-03-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett
Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter |
| 2026-03-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and
Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You
Yourself Sent! |
| 2026-03-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to
Hide From Consequences |
| 2026-03-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for
Impersonation and Worse |
| 2026-03-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won't Go
Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control
Media |
| 2026-04-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse
to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its
Cybercrime Unit |
| 2026-04-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of
Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile 'Targets' of
Garrett |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious
Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to
by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and
I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our
Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too |
| 2026-04-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of
Transparency, Illuminating Garrett's and Graveley's 'Tag-Team' Act,
Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts
to Hide Bad Behaviour |
| 2026-04-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound
Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and
Editing 10 Pages |
| 2026-04-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a
Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the
Reporter in Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion
Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation
Against Critics |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+
Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another
Continent |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett
and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?) |
| 2026-04-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous
Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12
Months) |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for
US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging
That Publishing Unflattering Information is a 'Privacy'
Issue |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic
Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets
"Plausible Deniability" |
| 2026-04-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate
Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake) |
| 2026-04-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
'Copypasta' Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change 'T' to
't') |
| 2026-04-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases
Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish
(Full Timeline) |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley's Attorney
Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did,
However, Pay Local Officials |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not
Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third
Parties |
| 2026-04-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who
Tell Women to Kill Themselves |
| 2026-04-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case,
Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Barristers |
| 2026-04-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm
Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler
From Microsoft |
| 2026-04-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means
to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in
Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar
Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End |
| 2026-04-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex
Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the
Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire
Office/Team) |
| 2026-04-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin
Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and
5RB |
| 2026-04-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for
Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft) |
| 2026-04-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP's
Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley |
| 2026-04-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like
Photocopies! |
| 2026-04-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs
Superficially 'Enforceable' in the UK, Using Threats |
| 2026-04-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex
Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is
"Reckless" and "Malicious", According to His 'Hired Guns' in
London |
| 2026-04-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at
Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is "Malice" |
| 2026-04-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must
Understand That Reporting Women's Issues in the United States of
America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible |
| 2026-04-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue
Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible
Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden |
| 2026-05-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down
Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could
Do This in One Minute) |
| 2026-05-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated
Threats (to "Shut Down" My "Existence" While Mentioning My Wife
Too) |
| 2026-05-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All
Along) |
| 2026-05-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal
Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy
Violation |
| 2026-05-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Against My Wife and I Assert 'Distress', But It Was Just a
Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears) |
| 2026-05-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars
of Claims, Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same
Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled) |
| 2026-05-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those
Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett's Plea for Apology |
| 2026-05-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett's (Pure 'Copy-paste',
Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!) |
| 2026-05-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of
Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for
Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett |
| 2026-05-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and
Liable for Lies |
| 2026-05-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 ("Tag-Teaming" Against
Bloggers in Another Continent) |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit
Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in
Another Continent |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable,
Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court
Judges About What They Did |
| 2026-05-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United
Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by
"Hired Guns") |
| 2026-05-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to
Handle Women (Except to Attack Them) |
| 2026-05-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the
Truth About Graveley and Garrett's Abuse of Processes, Stacking
Dockets |
| 2026-05-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100
KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of
Legal Papers Sent to Us) |
| 2026-05-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to
Meet a Judge's Deadline, Microsoft's Graveley Had Garrett's Lawyers
Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear
About My Position |
| 2026-05-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not
Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the
Family) |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 82 Out of 200: British Government
Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But
for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate
Power) |
| 2026-05-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against
SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers) |
| 2026-05-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom's Rating
for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better |
| 2026-05-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on
Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent
(Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies) |
| 2026-05-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice |
| 2026-05-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming
Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence
Them |
| 2026-05-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction,
That's Why Transparency is Paramount |
| 2026-05-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His
Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only
Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information |
| 2026-05-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of
Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by
Americans) |
| 2026-05-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned
"On" and "Off" Like a Faucet |
| 2026-05-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless
Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-06-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett's
Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His
Defence Yet! |
| 2026-06-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of
Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women |
| 2026-06-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death
Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to
People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill
Themselves |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the
Simple Observable Fact He's Closely Connected to the Microsofter
Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and
Worse) |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real
Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About
Microsoft's Bug Doors/Back Doors |
| 2026-06-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to
Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs
as SLAPP Clients) |
| 2026-06-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of
the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to
Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to
Attribute) |
| 2026-06-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They
Don't Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women |
| 2026-06-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day
Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really
Happened |
| 2026-06-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They
Know and Don't Know About Death Threats They Receive |
| 2026-06-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 104 Out of 200: Exactly Two Years Ago Brett
Wilson LLP Humiliated or Weaponised Our Solicitor's Judaism in an
Effort to Censor and Gag Us |
| 2026-06-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 105 Out of 200: When Bad Legal Advice
Results in Your Client, Dale Vince, Ordered to Pay £600k - or
801,930 United States Dollar (USD) - to the Person Frivolously Sued
(Lord Bailey of Paddington) |
| 2026-06-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 106 Out of 200: 100 Kilograms of Legal
Papers |
| 2026-06-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 107 Out of 200: Keeping Law Accessible to
Everybody |
| 2026-06-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 108 Out of 200: Moving On and Moving
Up |
| 2026-06-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 109 Out of 200: When You Drag Family
Members Into a Case Unrelated to Them Because Their Relative
Published Something |
| 2026-06-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 110 Out of 200: Anti-SLAPP Reform Formally
Advanced in the United Kingdom (UK) the Same Week the Serial
Strangler From Microsoft (US) Does Forum-Shopping in the
UK |
| 2026-06-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 111 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley (the
Latter Arrested for Strangling Women) Keep Ousting Their
Collaboration in Litigation, Lawfare in a Foreign
Continent |
| 2026-06-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 112 Out of 200: Strangles Women, Then
Refuses to Even Attend Any of His Own Hearings About It |
| 2026-06-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 113 Out of 200: The United Kingdom is Not
Turkey |
| 2026-06-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 114 Out of 200: Thousands of Long Articles
to Come, Properly Covering the SLAPP Industry in the UK and Its
Modus Operandi |
| 2026-06-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 115 Out of 200: Spending the Next Decade
Writing About SLAPPs and Trying to Fix the System |
| 2026-06-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 116 Out of 200: 5 Years of Multiparty
Lawfare Against Techrights, Funded by Americans and Also by Third
Parties (Including Microsoft Salaries) |
| 2026-06-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 117 Out of 200: Libel Tourism or Defamation
Forum-Shopping in the United Kingdom Condemned by the European
Union (EU) |
| 2026-06-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 118 Out of 200: Exposing Crimes is Not a
Crime, It is a Public Service |
| 2026-06-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 119 Out of 200: Our Suggestions to Our
Politicians and Heads of State |
| 2026-06-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 120 Out of 200: Garrett Undermines His Own
Application Because His Friend Graveley Failed to Accomplish What
They Had Both Aimed For |
| 2026-06-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 121 Out of 200: One Day We'll Discover What
Company or Rich Person/s Funded the Lawfare Against Us |
| 2026-06-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 122 Out of 200: Garrett's Solicitors
Confirm That Garrett is Ban-Evading and Spying on Our IRC
Network |
| 2026-06-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 123 Out of 200: Why Violence Against
Animals Matters |
| 2026-07-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 124 Out of 200: The Court Deems My Wife
Connected to the Case of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft,
Invites Her to the Hearing Last Week |
| 2026-07-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 125 Out of 200: Litigants in Person (LIPs)
Handling American Lawfare Funded by Third Parties (About a Million
Pounds for 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers) |
| 2026-07-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 126 Out of 200: Becoming More Aggressive
Against Us Only Proves Us Right |
| 2026-07-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 127 Out of 200: Lawsuits by Americans Filed
in the UK a Burden on British Taxpayers, No Way to Recover the
Funds When Americans Lose Their Cases |
| 2026-07-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 128 Out of 200: Making Laws Work for
Britain, Not Oversensitive Americans Looking for 'Revenge' by
Lawfare |
| 2026-07-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 129 Out of 200: Iranian Tactics |
| 2026-07-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 130 Out of 200: Jealousy, Envy,
Hubris |
| 2026-07-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 131 Out of 200: A Big Win for the Media in
the United Kingdom (UK) Today |
| 2026-07-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a
Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But
Have a Strong Community |
| 2026-07-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 133 Out of 200: Lies by Omission |
