SLAPP Censorship - Part 158 Out of 200: Making Alliances With Men Arrested for Strangling Women Was Always a Terrible Strategy
posted by Roy Schestowitz on Aug 22, 2026,
updated Aug 22, 2026
And somehow the problem is me, for merely reporting
that it happened???

In 2024 two
Americans who work for American slop companies
filed UK lawsuits in collaboration with one another.
Similarly,
in 2021 one made a threat to sue almost the same week the other got
arrested. Both are affiliated with GNOME and Microsoft (one of
them wrote publicly yesterday: "I'd like to say extra thanks
to Microsoft...") and they're not strangers.
Slop has since then become a big problem for courts, as we noted
the other day in a long article/installment. In the US, as
American media put it 2 days ago, "court filings are citing legal
cases that don’t actually exist". It quotes Crawford Appleby as
saying: "They're not prepared and I think part of it also is a
failure to understand what the technology is..." (LLMs or
"Plagiarism Engines")
As noted here a couple of days ago, some of the filings put
before a British judge (not here in Manchester but in London) were
prepared by an American who generated it all using a computer
program. The judge threw out all those filings and the American who
generated it all didn't even show up for his own hearing
(despite being in London at the time - a point we shall revisit
later).
What we have here are 2 slop charlatans, promoting plagiarism
and
copy-pasting almost everything in an effort to double the financial
burden created in warfare. They don't show up for any of
their own hearings and they secretly communicate with one another
to coordinate their tag-teaming [1,
2].

Garrett (left) is culpable for it. Brett Wilson LLP thought
launching a second, tactical lawsuit (SLAPP) without prior notice
and with inappropriate communication sent to a solicitor not on
record would somehow help Garrett (because having another go at the
webhost didn't get far on the very same month [1,
2]. However, it only backfired in a major way and months later
Garrett's personal life became an utter disaster - a fact he could
not deny as it would still
spill out and be seen publicly, repeatedly in fact. This
showed their solicitors, barristers (at one point they involved a
second barrister, according to the metadata), and both clients were
acting in very bad faith - an
actionable abuse of process too.
To be clear, the above-mentioned tactical lawsuit (SLAPP) would
soon rely on repeated false statements
made to several High Court judges - later to be refuted by
Garrett himself (he was cross-examined, he had been sued in
September 2024 [1,
2] and this led to both chief judges in media to be more
involved, then inclined to offer
Legal Aid and for the state to agree (assurance of sufficient
legal cover where it matters most
because women aren't hostages [1,
2]).
There are two aspects to this - both the state and the Court
(and the Minister of Justice, who is very much familiar with this
and writes letters about it). What my wife had been subjected to is
utterly abhorrent and can become a stain the perception of justice
or
access to justice if not properly ameliorated (and
not behind closed doors).

The above actions or the general conduct by Brett Wilson LLP
(or
Wilson FC) is foolish and self-harming (now they lack
defamation business; they try to rebrand as privacy experts by
trying hard to advertise themselves, piggybacking cases they have
absolutely nothing to do with). It would disrupt the
storytelling of Garrett as a petty victim; what sort of victim
collaborates with Microsoft men who victimise women while seeking
funding (for lawfare)
from third parties? Merely pointing this out would
always hurt their feelings and
they would never show up or talk in any of their own hearings!
(Even when they left America and came to London)
They're still not explaining why they're litigants in
absentia. If you're going to spend over a million pounds on
litigation, why not buy some plane tickets?
To be clear, after almost 24 months of the Graveley lawsuit it
is still in stage 1, virtually the first step of the process
because it cannot progress. Several judges in actual hearings,
listening to me (litigants from America MIA), sympathised with my
position and asked me to put it clearly in writing (the main
obstacle then is rules that typically only barristers are trained
to fully comply with and then defend, if/when challenged,
what they put forth).
If the courts know - or once they properly understand - the full
picture (in spite of lies told by the other side) the dynamics
change completely. The judgements cannot be rushed, patience is
needed, and orders are made that are favourable to us because no
experienced practitioner would mistake this for a legitimate set of
cases - they try to use the brute force of the system and
associated costs to force us to capitulate on financial grounds
alone. Some offered to work on this pro bono, but
recovering the money spent would be virtually impossible not only
because Graveley is an American living in another company but also
living in his dad's home (where he
was arrested,
later charged). He's not in a position to compensate the person
he attacks from across the Atlantic. That's one of many reasons we
need an overall/reform here. Even barristers and solicitors willing
to handle this on a pro bono basis know that chasing
Americans is laborious.
The Americans exploit this.
On top of that, there's the BSB and SRA (regulators of
barristers and solicitors in the UK, respectively) - not that they
have the capacity, integrity and financial resources to properly
deal with or tackle any of this. The regulators are familiar with
this as well.
The
Americans' barrister should be utterly ashamed of himself - he
now disgraces his own employer for direct involvement in all the
above. His employer has in fact been put on notice regarding this.
He knows next to nothing about technology, yet
he runs ads (copy-pasted of course) for people who pretend to
be things they are not [1,
2]. █
Previous Parts:
| 2026-03-03 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No.
KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell |
| 2026-03-04 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed
Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted
Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-03-05 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth
Breakdown |
| 2026-03-06 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s
Version of Events and Narrative |
| 2026-03-07 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a
Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be
One |
| 2026-03-08 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally
Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had
Been Subjected to Similar Abuse |
| 2026-03-09 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the
Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide
Embarrassing Facts |
| 2026-03-10 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of
UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass
Surveillance) |
| 2026-03-11 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister
Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid
Well Over $200,000 to 'Speak' or 'Cover' for) |
| 2026-03-12 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public
Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn't About Justice,
It's About Censorship |
| 2026-03-13 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor
His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today |
| 2026-03-14 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead
of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits
(Funded by Third Parties) as 'Revenge' for Exposing Crimes |
| 2026-03-15 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of
Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations |
| 2026-03-16 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive
Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation
Buddy Garrett Did Cause "Serious Harm" |
| 2026-03-17 |
Microsofters' SLAPP Censorship - Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who
Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public
Apologies to These Men |
| 2026-03-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars
of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines |
| 2026-03-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and
Explaining Techrights' Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC)
Network |
| 2026-03-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of
Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People
Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade |
| 2026-03-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding
Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices
That Uphold Real National Security |
| 2026-03-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for
Tough Questions in Cross-Examination |
| 2026-03-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and
to GAFAM Funding |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 21 Out of 200: It's About Behaviour Online,
Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers
and Two Barristers |
| 2026-03-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People
Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC
and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles) |
| 2026-03-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for
2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to 'Break the
Bank' in Pursuit of "Revenge" |
| 2026-03-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett
Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife's Lawsuit Against
Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed) |
| 2026-03-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett
Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter |
| 2026-03-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and
Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You
Yourself Sent! |
| 2026-03-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to
Hide From Consequences |
| 2026-03-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for
Impersonation and Worse |
| 2026-03-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won't Go
Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control
Media |
| 2026-04-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse
to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its
Cybercrime Unit |
| 2026-04-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of
Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile 'Targets' of
Garrett |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious
Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to
by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost |
| 2026-04-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and
I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our
Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too |
| 2026-04-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of
Transparency, Illuminating Garrett's and Graveley's 'Tag-Team' Act,
Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts
to Hide Bad Behaviour |
| 2026-04-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound
Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and
Editing 10 Pages |
| 2026-04-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a
Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the
Reporter in Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion
Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation
Against Critics |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+
Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another
Continent |
| 2026-04-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett
and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?) |
| 2026-04-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous
Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12
Months) |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for
US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging
That Publishing Unflattering Information is a 'Privacy'
Issue |
| 2026-04-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic
Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets
"Plausible Deniability" |
| 2026-04-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate
Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake) |
| 2026-04-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley
'Copypasta' Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change 'T' to
't') |
| 2026-04-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases
Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish
(Full Timeline) |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley's Attorney
Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did,
However, Pay Local Officials |
| 2026-04-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not
Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third
Parties |
| 2026-04-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who
Tell Women to Kill Themselves |
| 2026-04-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case,
Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB
Barristers |
| 2026-04-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm
Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler
From Microsoft |
| 2026-04-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means
to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in
Another Continent) |
| 2026-04-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar
Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End |
| 2026-04-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex
Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the
Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire
Office/Team) |
| 2026-04-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin
Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and
5RB |
| 2026-04-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for
Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft) |
| 2026-04-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP's
Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley |
| 2026-04-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like
Photocopies! |
| 2026-04-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP
Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs
Superficially 'Enforceable' in the UK, Using Threats |
| 2026-04-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex
Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is
"Reckless" and "Malicious", According to His 'Hired Guns' in
London |
| 2026-04-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at
Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is "Malice" |
| 2026-04-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must
Understand That Reporting Women's Issues in the United States of
America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible |
| 2026-04-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue
Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible
Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden |
| 2026-05-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down
Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could
Do This in One Minute) |
| 2026-05-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated
Threats (to "Shut Down" My "Existence" While Mentioning My Wife
Too) |
| 2026-05-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All
Along) |
| 2026-05-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal
Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy
Violation |
| 2026-05-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims
Against My Wife and I Assert 'Distress', But It Was Just a
Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears) |
| 2026-05-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars
of Claims, Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same
Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled) |
| 2026-05-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those
Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett's Plea for Apology |
| 2026-05-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley
Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett's (Pure 'Copy-paste',
Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!) |
| 2026-05-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of
Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for
Microsoft's Graveley and Garrett |
| 2026-05-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and
Liable for Lies |
| 2026-05-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft's Graveley and
Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 ("Tag-Teaming" Against
Bloggers in Another Continent) |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit
Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in
Another Continent |
| 2026-05-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable,
Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court
Judges About What They Did |
| 2026-05-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United
Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by
"Hired Guns") |
| 2026-05-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to
Handle Women (Except to Attack Them) |
| 2026-05-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the
Truth About Graveley and Garrett's Abuse of Processes, Stacking
Dockets |
| 2026-05-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100
KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of
Legal Papers Sent to Us) |
| 2026-05-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to
Meet a Judge's Deadline, Microsoft's Graveley Had Garrett's Lawyers
Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear
About My Position |
| 2026-05-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not
Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the
Family) |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 82 Out of 200: British Government
Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP |
| 2026-05-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But
for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate
Power) |
| 2026-05-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against
SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers) |
| 2026-05-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom's Rating
for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better |
| 2026-05-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on
Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent
(Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies) |
| 2026-05-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice |
| 2026-05-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming
Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence
Them |
| 2026-05-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction,
That's Why Transparency is Paramount |
| 2026-05-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His
Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only
Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information |
| 2026-05-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of
Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by
Americans) |
| 2026-05-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned
"On" and "Off" Like a Faucet |
| 2026-05-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless
Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another
Continent) |
| 2026-06-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett's
Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His
Defence Yet! |
| 2026-06-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of
Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women |
| 2026-06-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death
Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to
People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill
Themselves |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the
Simple Observable Fact He's Closely Connected to the Microsofter
Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and
Worse) |
| 2026-06-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real
Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About
Microsoft's Bug Doors/Back Doors |
| 2026-06-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to
Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs
as SLAPP Clients) |
| 2026-06-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of
the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to
Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to
Attribute) |
| 2026-06-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They
Don't Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women |
| 2026-06-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day
Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really
Happened |
| 2026-06-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They
Know and Don't Know About Death Threats They Receive |
| 2026-06-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 104 Out of 200: Exactly Two Years Ago Brett
Wilson LLP Humiliated or Weaponised Our Solicitor's Judaism in an
Effort to Censor and Gag Us |
| 2026-06-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 105 Out of 200: When Bad Legal Advice
Results in Your Client, Dale Vince, Ordered to Pay £600k - or
801,930 United States Dollar (USD) - to the Person Frivolously Sued
(Lord Bailey of Paddington) |
| 2026-06-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 106 Out of 200: 100 Kilograms of Legal
Papers |
| 2026-06-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 107 Out of 200: Keeping Law Accessible to
Everybody |
| 2026-06-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 108 Out of 200: Moving On and Moving
Up |
| 2026-06-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 109 Out of 200: When You Drag Family
Members Into a Case Unrelated to Them Because Their Relative
Published Something |
| 2026-06-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 110 Out of 200: Anti-SLAPP Reform Formally
Advanced in the United Kingdom (UK) the Same Week the Serial
Strangler From Microsoft (US) Does Forum-Shopping in the
UK |
| 2026-06-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 111 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley (the
Latter Arrested for Strangling Women) Keep Ousting Their
Collaboration in Litigation, Lawfare in a Foreign
Continent |
| 2026-06-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 112 Out of 200: Strangles Women, Then
Refuses to Even Attend Any of His Own Hearings About It |
| 2026-06-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 113 Out of 200: The United Kingdom is Not
Turkey |
| 2026-06-22 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 114 Out of 200: Thousands of Long Articles
to Come, Properly Covering the SLAPP Industry in the UK and Its
Modus Operandi |
| 2026-06-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 115 Out of 200: Spending the Next Decade
Writing About SLAPPs and Trying to Fix the System |
| 2026-06-23 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 116 Out of 200: 5 Years of Multiparty
Lawfare Against Techrights, Funded by Americans and Also by Third
Parties (Including Microsoft Salaries) |
| 2026-06-24 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 117 Out of 200: Libel Tourism or Defamation
Forum-Shopping in the United Kingdom Condemned by the European
Union (EU) |
| 2026-06-25 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 118 Out of 200: Exposing Crimes is Not a
Crime, It is a Public Service |
| 2026-06-26 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 119 Out of 200: Our Suggestions to Our
Politicians and Heads of State |
| 2026-06-27 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 120 Out of 200: Garrett Undermines His Own
Application Because His Friend Graveley Failed to Accomplish What
They Had Both Aimed For |
| 2026-06-28 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 121 Out of 200: One Day We'll Discover What
Company or Rich Person/s Funded the Lawfare Against Us |
| 2026-06-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 122 Out of 200: Garrett's Solicitors
Confirm That Garrett is Ban-Evading and Spying on Our IRC
Network |
| 2026-06-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 123 Out of 200: Why Violence Against
Animals Matters |
| 2026-07-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 124 Out of 200: The Court Deems My Wife
Connected to the Case of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft,
Invites Her to the Hearing Last Week |
| 2026-07-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 125 Out of 200: Litigants in Person (LIPs)
Handling American Lawfare Funded by Third Parties (About a Million
Pounds for 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers) |
| 2026-07-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 126 Out of 200: Becoming More Aggressive
Against Us Only Proves Us Right |
| 2026-07-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 127 Out of 200: Lawsuits by Americans Filed
in the UK a Burden on British Taxpayers, No Way to Recover the
Funds When Americans Lose Their Cases |
| 2026-07-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 128 Out of 200: Making Laws Work for
Britain, Not Oversensitive Americans Looking for 'Revenge' by
Lawfare |
| 2026-07-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 129 Out of 200: Iranian Tactics |
| 2026-07-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 130 Out of 200: Jealousy, Envy,
Hubris |
| 2026-07-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 131 Out of 200: A Big Win for the Media in
the United Kingdom (UK) Today |
| 2026-07-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a
Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But
Have a Strong Community |
| 2026-07-29 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 133 Out of 200: Lies by Omission |
| 2026-07-30 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 134 Out of 200: What "Majority Rules" Tell
Us About the Litigant |
| 2026-07-31 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 135 Out of 200: Limited Liability
Partnership (LLP) That Does Not Disclose Financial Activities
Before August |
| 2026-08-01 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 136 Out of 200: Lawyers That Get Paid to
Mess About |
| 2026-08-02 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 137 Out of 200: Discovering That Spending a
Million British Pounds (1,348,250.01 United States Dollars) on
Lawyers Cannot Take Down One's Critics |
| 2026-08-03 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 138 Out of 200: Garrett Has Basically
"Lost" and It is "Embarrassing" to Them |
| 2026-08-04 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 139 Out of 200: Solicitors Regulation
Authority (SRA) Needs More Public Scrutiny (New Management Changed
Nothing, It's Costing a Lot of Taxpayers' Money) |
| 2026-08-05 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 140 Out of 200: You Become What You Eat,
Your Clients Become You |
| 2026-08-06 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 141 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Failed to
Learn From the Mistakes of the European Patent Office
(EPO) |
| 2026-08-07 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 142 Out of 200: GemText is Not a Webpage,
Gemini Protocol is Not the Web, and Capsules Are Not
Websites |
| 2026-08-08 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 143 Out of 200: After Nearly 10 Attempts to
Settle With Us and Over a Million Pounds Spent on Lawyers and
Barristers |
| 2026-08-09 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 144 Out of 200: The "Hired Guns" ("Media"
at BW) Shrank Almost Three-Fold Since They Sued Us in 2024 |
| 2026-08-10 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 145 Out of 200: They Tried Hard to Hide the
Fact Their Client Had Been Sued, Twice Even |
| 2026-08-11 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 146 Out of 200: An Industry of Plagiarism,
'Normalised' |
| 2026-08-12 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 147 Out of 200: The SLAPP Series is 'Slow'
Because Timing Matters |
| 2026-08-13 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 148 Out of 200: The Manosphere |
| 2026-08-14 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 149 Out of 200: It Took a Long Time to Show
What Jason Arday (at Cambridge) and Harvey Weinstein (in Hollywood)
Really Were |
| 2026-08-15 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 150 Out of 200: Always Independently Verify
What People Claim to Be (or Find Yourself in a Jason Arday-Type
Moment/Dilemma) |
| 2026-08-16 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 151 Out of 200: Dealing With Sleazy People
and Companies That Steal (While Employing These Sleazy
People) |
| 2026-08-17 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 152 Out of 200: Injunctions Do Not Cover
Criticism, They Have Scope |
| 2026-08-18 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 153 Out of 200: Decades of Debt,
Weaponising Borrowed Money to Try to Put Their Critics in
Debt |
| 2026-08-19 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 154 Out of 200: Computer-Generated Legal
Filings From Men Who Are Salaried by Mass Plagiarism Companies in
Another Continent (America) |
| 2026-08-20 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 155 Out of 200: Throwing Stones in Houses
Made of Glass |
| 2026-08-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 156 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Becoming
Wilson FC |
| 2026-08-21 |
SLAPP Censorship - Part 157 Out of 200: What is a 'Defamation
Troll'? |