The Label 'Anti-AI'
They make it sound like opposing plagiarism or rejection of cheating is an act of intolerance or hatred
Beware the label or the term 'Anti-AI'. It's a loaded phrase. First, people do not oppose Machines Learning. It has been around for about half a century, even longer. It did a lot of good.
When people use the label "AI" they nowadays refer to something else completely - something wherein the inputs are retrieved without authorisation, without licensing etc. They're laundering 'theft' as 'training set' or 'fair use' or "AI" (two-letter nothing-burger that alludes to the grabbing, not processing/analysis).
In the domain of music, there are copyright lawsuits due to this.
See, when I did Machines Learning in my Ph.D. 23+ years ago I had to seek permission (or our faculty had to seek permission, do paperwork etc.) before training all sorts of models, e.g. of the human brain. We were careful in how data was handled.
People - as in ordinary folks - are not "anti", they are pro-consent. They are also increasingly recognising that the people who call themselves the "AI industry" with job titles like "AI expert" are pursuing a malicious agenda. Consent issues aside (or lack thereof), some of them sell "bombing as a service" (based on overhyped heuristics) or carelessly lead people to kill themselves.
So if something name-drops a phrase like "anti-AI" it's best to stop and correct... or seek clarification. Without correct terms, corrupt actors misframe the debate; they make the corrupters seem like the victims (of exclusion, intolerance, hostility and so on). █