Microsoft Sued for Patent Infringement, Patents Brain Probing
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
2008-01-19 12:51:32 UTC
Modified: 2008-01-20 06:07:52 UTC
Freaky, freaky, freaky!
As we pointed out last week, Microsoft is becoming one the USPTO's largest clients (yes, clients). One thing which was interesting to find is that Microsoft is claimed guilty of infringing on patents -- those patents which is loves so much.
Zhongyi Electronic, a 100-employee firm, alleged that Microsoft has used its inputting technology and fonts in Windows operating systems without commercial agreement for a decade, the official Xinhua news agency reported.
When a Microsoft Corp. patent application for a method of sorting brain waves surfaced late last year, it drew quips that the company now plans to read PC users' minds, in addition to selling them software.
This probably makes the pinnacle of a series of disturbing and unethical patents identified in the past few months. These include:
Who doesn't like patent litigation? I know I do. What could be more fun than reading newspapers articles about companies suing the pants out of each other for infringing on ideas the suing party are theirs. It doesn't matter that the defendant might never even have heard of the patent in question, as patent law nevertheless applies and gives the claimant a chance to make a windfall in damages for patent infringement.
The EU is now close to setting up its own Community Patent Litigation System (CPLS), which would turn the current national-based litigation into something bigger, a community-wide litigation-fest. The idea of a CPLS came from the Commission back in 2004, but since then the Member State politicians have gotten involved and have been hard at work in coming up with a proposal for such a system.
With regards to patents, Pieter Hintjens has just added a video which sheds some light on the issues at hand.
We apologise, but there is no Ogg Theroa version. Pieter's permission to produce it would be needed. ⬆
Bluesky is a private company (unlike Bluesky Digital Assets Corp. in Toronto, that one runs a pyramid scheme!), so it's hard to know for sure just how much money it is losing
Setting up several reliable copies of the data, plus several off-site backups (this data is nowhere as sensitive as medical data), should only cost a few grand
If someone (or someones) calls you paranoid for taking about "beacon"-like functionality, there will be no lack of authoritative citations (e.g. Web links) they can be provided to prove them wrong
There's no "anti-AI" (it's not even AI), there's opposition to fraud, to plagiarism, and to companies that profit more when there's global warning (caused in part by their business activities)