Summary: New examples from critics of the Gates Foundation where media consensus is utterly incorrect and paid for

GATES WATCHERS is a Web site that keeps an eye on the Gates Foundation.

Critics of Gates do not receive the exposure they deserve, in part due to financial strings that Gates attaches to publications (we provided evidence before). In a copy of a paid articles (thus less accessible) we find that "Tim Ogden writes the Foundation has issues with hearing the truth, accountability, and focus." (source)

Another summary says: "It has pushed well past the boundaries of traditional foundation behaviour, intervening in and influencing public policy on both domestic and international matters - for good or ill, or very likely for a mixture of both."

And another copy of an article alludes to Monsanto lobbying when it says:

And he says that Rockefeller no longer works in the same areas as the Gates Foundation. Huh? Don't they both fund AGRA?

We wrote about this before, many times in fact. Gates keeps pushing his own numbers funded by himself to praise his work and push his agenda, so paper trail says a lot:

The DCP2 was published by the Disease Control Priorities Project, a joint enterprise of The World Bank, the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, and the Population Reference Bureau, which was funded primarily by a $3.5 million grant from the Gates Foundation.

Regarding this shameful article, Gates Watchers asks:

How many grants did it get from the Gates Foundation before it gave Melinda this award?

As points out in our IRC channels this week, Gates also bribes many departments to have these rebranded after him, creating the illusion that he is loved (reputation laundering using the money he illegally earned). The Melinda worship is equally disturbing as we already saw how The Guardian and the BBC praised her right after they had gotten bribed by her husband. We covered this at the time and put forth then evidence.

As pointed out in another posting:

Here we see a Gates Foundation-supported evaluation of a Gates Foundation-supported project with a comment by chairs of a Gates Foundation-supported evaluation group. The potential for bias is clear.

It's all stacked.

It turns out that homeless people surround the tax-evading corporation known as Gates Foundation (based on local news), but do they know the extent to which this foundation is exploiting the public and distorting information which gets presented to the public?

About 100 homeless people and anti-poverty activists staged a "sleep-out" Monday night outside the new Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation building in Seattle to protest a funding shortage that has forced the closure of 15 shelters.

Unless there is profit and PR to be made from the homeless, Gates will do nothing. It is class warfare from Gates and fellow criminals (who use PR to hide past crimes from media attention givers who do their work properly). We will need to write about this subject in length at a later stage. But basically, Gates keeps getting richer while controlling the press to the point where it says he "gives" (free samples to create patent dependence, PR, and so forth). It's a big scam. ⬆