Patent Debates After the Apple Debacle
- Dr. Roy Schestowitz
- 2012-10-21 16:10:08 UTC
- Modified: 2012-10-21 16:10:08 UTC
Summary: A collection of patent news, especially news about software patents and patent trolls which use these
THERE has been a huge number of articles about patents since Apple got a favourable -- albeit corrupt -- ruling.
Apple co-founder Woz
disagrees the other co-founder,
Steve Jobs, and
his potential "thermonuclear" war on Android,
wasting Google's time and money, slowing down innovation and progress.
So-called 'legal' folks
talk about software patents and FOSS folks like the OSI's head, Simon Phipps,
provide actual evidence. For instance:
Recent research supports view that patent troll activity is rising -- costing America a fortune in wasted legal fees and lost jobs
A game widely known in the FOSS community
has been hit:
Software patents: this needs to stop. X Plane is an awesome flight simulator, made by an independent developer who injects tons of innovations in his product and he is been patent trolled.
The EFF
gets increasingly involved and
the press too calls firms "patent trolls" even in headlines (but
not the mainstream press). There are around
9,423 patents on the subject of WiFi alone and some trolls exploit this to create thickets. Some even
put thickets around the Web:
The New York Times has decided to take on the noble task of battling the scum of the Earth: patent trolls.
Rather that cave into one troll’s ludicrous monetary demand for what essentially is the basis of the internet, the Times’ lawyers have headed for the court room, says the Associated Press. At issue? Hyperlinks in text messages.
Here is
another troll which
harms the Web. We recently found out that W3C people too had lobbied for FRAND. It's just like RAND, but rather than sounding random it sounds like "friend" and the F stands for "fair". It's a propaganda term for software patents, championed by IBM, Microsoft, and so on. It is like calling war "for peace" and the W3C just embarrasses itself again [
1,
2,
3,
4,
5].
⬆
Comments
mcinsand
2012-10-22 16:26:44
Willfully filing for a bogus patent needs to receive significant jailtime, especially if the bogus patent is not only not an innovation, but it results in litigation. Granted, proving willful stupidity is tough, but negligence is not, especially in cases involving considerable litigation. Companies that file lawsuits on bogus 'innovations' (rounded corners, anyone?) need to face punitive liabilities.