The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Just some statistics

Bdale would you try pinging tigaon2.cps.cmich.edu that is a sparc20 here 
(notably our only sparc20 :) and see if there is a difference because if 
there is it might be due to a defective ethernet card because I was 
running tests from another machine here (same machine almost) but has a 
different ethernet and don't get the same problem...

On Wed, 31 Jan 1996, Bdale Garbee wrote:
I will do the same using 100 packet counts for these sites
> 
> 	site			normal ping	flood ping
> 
> 	ftp.ucsd.edu		1% loss		7% loss
				0%		19%
> 	gatekeeper.dec.com	0% loss		7% loss
				0%		26%
> 	prep.ai.mit.edu		2% loss		10% loss
				1%		7%
> 	ftp.uu.net		4% loss		7% loss
				5%		9%
> 	wuarchive.wustl.edu	25% loss	25% loss
				7%		10%	
> 	louie.udel.edu		4% loss		14% loss
				15%		29%
> 	ftp.cdrom.com		0% loss		4% loss
				1%		3%
> 
> and, of course,
> 
> 	ftp.debian.org		19% loss	26% loss
> 

	master.debian.org	25%		33%


--
Matthew S. Bailey
107 Emmons Hall
Central Michigan University
Mt. Pleasant, MI 48858

mbailey@cps.cmich.edu

... Any resemblance between the above views and those of my employer,
my terminal, or the view out my window are purely coincidental.  Any
resemblance between the above and my own views is non-deterministic.
The question of the existence of views in the absence of anyone to hold
them is left as an exercise for the reader.  The question of the
existence of the reader is left as an exercise for the second god
coefficient.  (A discussion of non-orthogonal, non-integral polytheism
is beyond the scope of this article.)