The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Guidelines docs on ftp.debian.org.

Nikhil Nair <nn201@cus.cam.ac.uk> said:

> Bill Mitchell wrote:
>
> Can we target this
> > Friday for concluding the discussion?
> 
> Umm ... are you tal7as under the impression that both had petered out ...
> and the only change being discussed that I can remember was whether the 
> revision field should be compulsory - my impression was that you wanted 
> it to be but most people disagreed.  Did I miss out on something?

I was talking about debian-private.  I hadn't planned a protracted
discussion period for debian-devel, but rather just to upload the
replacement dchanges package with information in the package announcement
that it involves some minor package file naming and processing changes.

I think the only issue still open is the one about requiring -revision
parts in package names.  Some people questioned this, I provided backup
reasoning, and discussion sort of petered out.

If anyone has more to say, please speak up.