The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

New package naming etc...

I have pine-3.94 just about ready to go (I am composing this in the new
version) and thought that I should check some things first.
As I understand it the new package naming convention is:

package-name_version-revision.architecture.deb

or is the revision field seperated from the version by an underscore?

Should we begin phasing in this naming convention now, or are we waiting
for something else?

Are there any other modifications that I need to consider for
debian.rules? I have heard pieces/parts of several discussions.

Which of the goals for 1.2 should we be considering implementing soonest?

Thanks,

Dwarf

------------                                          --------------

aka   Dale Scheetz                   Phone:   1 (904) 877-0257
      Flexible Software              Fax:     NONE 
      Black Creek Critters           e-mail:  dwarf@polaris.net

------------ If you don't see what you want, just ask --------------