The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GNU reconciliation

> Eloquent? Perhaps you should re-read them -- they say *completely
> different things* and that is important... comparing the eloquence
> of a disclaimer (XFree, TeX, BSD) and a political statement (GPL) is
> hardly meaningful :-)

Erm, perhaps you don't understand what I mean by eloquence.  The GPL
is written very well, and makes a very good appeal to _why_ software
should be free -- it doesn't just talk about the "free to take the
code and use it as long as you give due credit."  The political
statement of auto-GPLing code and of no-charge-for-source are another
matter.  I don't really give a hoot about that part, it is the free
flow of ideas and of work that _I_ appreciate in the GPL.  And I think
the GPL is written a heck of a lot better then the XFree or TeX
copyrights, which also grant that free flow of information and ideas.
Clear now?


Jim