The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Which libc should we use in the future?

Guy Maor writes:
> On Thu, 10 Oct 1996, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> > Isn't this why we have Depends: ? If the .deb files depend on
> > libc5 (>=5.4.8-1) there isn't a problem, right?
> 
> But we can't make packages in the stable tree depend on libc5
> (>=5.4.8-1).

Exactly.

> Or are your advocating putting 5.4.8 in the stable tree?

David
-- 
David Engel                        Optical Data Systems, Inc.
david@ods.com                      1001 E. Arapaho Road
(972) 234-6400                     Richardson, TX  75081

--
Please respect the confidentiality of material on the debian-private list.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-REQUEST@lists.debian.org . Trouble? e-mail to Bruce@Pixar.com