The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]

Debian Development mailing list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>, Tom Lees <tom@lpsg.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Automakized dpkg
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970304183356.2841A-100000@debian.dd.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@calder.med.miami.edu>
Date: 04 Mar 1997 14:46:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: Tom Lees's message of Tue, 4 Mar 1997 18:41:45 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <87d8tfsaml.fsf@calder.med.miami.edu>
Lines: 49
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.40/Emacs 19.34

Tom Lees <tom@lpsg.demon.co.uk> writes:
> On 3 Mar 1997, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > Wow.  I suspect this makes you the New Dpkg Expert.
> Hmmm... I must have spent around 20-30 hours looking at the Makefile's...
> but the sources, I haven't touched, other than checking that #define's are
> actually used in the correct places (instead of hardcoding
> Debian-specific dirs, like /var/lib/dpkg).

Smart move, ducking responsibility like that. :-)

> Yes - they are only re-built if the manuals-version or the .sgml files
> have changed. :)

If I ever have children, I will name _all_ of them after you.

> > Galen Hazelwood, the gcc maintainer, has a version of dpkg that has
> > been i18n'd.  This would probably be a great thing to be integrated
> > into your changes.
> Thanks. Are his patches still up-to-date and on master.debian.org? (I
> vaguely remember his original announcement).

If they are not up to date, it should be in an only minor way---his
patches were done around 1.4.0.6, and there have been just a handful
of changes since then, and none I would expect to matter.

And yes, I believe he has them in his home dir on master.

> > I, too, though, would suggest that this be put in 'experimental' or
> > some such---just to satisfy the paranoid among us.
> OK... (source only package, of course).

I apologize, 'paranoid' was very much the wrong word---I *did not*
mean to suggest you were in any way untrustworthy, or that binaries
would be suspicious.

What I meant to say was that it may not be appropriate for it to be in
unstable, given the imminent code freeze and the relative lack of
testing---especially if you're able to integrate Galen's i18n'd
version.

I really should have worked harder at finding something other than
'paranoid' to express that---it just carries too much baggage.  Sorry.

> OK - you should be able to download from Incoming soon - I'll upload it
> as a source-only "dpkg-am".

Cool.

Mike.