The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFD: herding cats

On Wed, 5 Mar 1997, Martin Schulze wrote:

>  7) Who does summaries in these lists anyway?
 
> I request a set of people who are generally willing to undertake this.
 
> Once a thread has established and it has shown that it is an important
> one a list maintainer should request such a person.  I could imagine
> handling this just like vote-takers volunteer for usenet votes.

Hmmm. why not handle the entire discussion the way usenet groups are
decided? eg, when someone has an idea for debian, he/she mails an RFD
instructing on what mailing-list to discuss about his/her idea, and when 
some sort of conclusion is done, send an CFV, asking for a vote 
from BoD (or whatever necessary to make it official...), who then send a
RESULT explaing to the developers what has changed and how to react.

Comments? Variations?