The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: hot-site backup for master.debian.org

Vincent Renardias writes:

> > Under normal circumstances I would appreciate this.  But this time I
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> > have to interpret this action as another try to get control over the
> > whole project and moving it into a direction that is not wished nor
> > planed without letting anyone contribute who is not of your oppinion.
> > IMHO the InterNIC thing is only an plea to make most maintainer
> > believe that this action is good for the project.
> 
> Every critical system have a backup. (At least when system administration 
> is made properly) We already had the mailing lists set up at novare.net, 
> and the (IMHO) logical next step is to have a full filesystem backup. 
> Where's the problem?

As I said, under normal circumstances I would appreciate this action.

What do you think how long will it take if all services for Debian
run at *.novare.net or any other site that seems to be more
Bruce-accepting than now?

> Are you upset because Bruce didn't warn about this backup? Well, I've 
> never met a user unhappy to have a backup of his work somewhere.
> Are you upset because you wanted *your* machine to be the backup? Then 
> just say so: having another backup can't hurt.

No, I'm only hurt because Mr. Perens makes decisions that are (or can
be) essential for the project without discussing them with the members.

I don't need a tyrant nor a dictator.  What I found when I joined
the project was a group that has had one goal to work for.  What I
see now is a childish (or calculated) leader who behaves like a
tyrant, harsh discussions, rand on and on, decisions and ideas that
I can't even partially accept.  If these ideas came from a "simple"
maintainer it were ok, but they came from our beloved leader.

	Thanks

	Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 /                 Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only /
/          proved it correct, not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth /