The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: further comment on survey questions

On Fri, 11 Apr 1997, Greg Vence wrote:

> Could it not also work effectively to allow everyone to vote the Leader
> and then let the Leader pick who he's got to work with?  With the
> willingness for input & the expressed desire for a 'benevolent
> dictatorship' it seems reasonable that the team wouldn't allow
> decissions out of bounds.
> 

I'm sure it would work but why would the leader not want to work with
other people chosen by the Debian community?

> Ditto.  However, I think we could get out of hand on requesting for
> votes too. 

Most political systems that allow referendums get round this by not
allowing a question to be put up for vote unless it has been sponsored by
a certain number of people.

> I prefer voting on the general questions to guide the
> project.  Like 'Should the focus be FREE software?,' Who is
> Leader/BOD... For the rest, I'd say let the leaders lead.  I'd rather
> solve technical issues. :)
> 

I can certainly agree with that.  Let's hope the bickering is behind us.

-- Jaldhar