The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: let's ditch npasswd-boulder

On 4 Jul 1997, John Goerzen wrote:

>> (i.e. authentication done right, IMHO) in Debian 2.0? Because if we do, we
>> should get started *now*. Are the pam libraries ready for prime time? And
>> are there people interested in pamizing applications? I'd be willing to
>> help, but I don't have the time to do it all. (Followups on debian-devel,
>> please.)
>
>>From my experience with RedHat, which uses PAM, PAM is a menace -- it
>unnecessarily complicates what should be simple things.

I also still fail to see what big benefit it would bring. I know the
author and had some talks with him. It seems that PAM has its use mostly
in very esoteric circumstances that I have not seen any relevance to any
of the systems I run.

--- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ --- +++ ---


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .