The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: policy wrt distribution of modified binaries

On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, [iso-8859-1] Nicolás Lichtmaier wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, joost witteveen wrote:
> 
> > >  I don't understund why do people consieder that a piece of software can
> > > satisfy the DFSG and provide no source. I think that binary-only software
> > > is *much* more non-free than gnuplot or cygwin32.
> > You severely misquote me here!
> > I didn't say qt satisfied DFSG, I just said qt can probably be
> > moved to contrib, from non-free. Still it can of cource never
> > satisfy DFSG, and should never be in main with the current
> > licence.
> 
>  I agree. Sorry, I didn't mean that you were wrong... I just wanted to say
> that and quoted without sense.. =)
> 
>  What I think is this:
> 
>  Why are we considering that abuse is freer than qt or java? 

Abuse is now in the Public Domain.  Check David Taylors finger.
ddt@crack.com.

Shaya



--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .