The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: debian-private exploding vendor-sec?

> Jim Pick <jim@jimpick.com> writes:
> 
> > Is it necessary to have debian-private subscribed to the vendor-sec list?
> > 
> > I'd prefer it if the security@debian.org list was subscribed to it
> > instead.
> 
> It is, but security is just an alias for debian-private.  I'm in favor
> of making security be a smaller alias.  It could send to a half dozen
> people or so.  Those people would then try to contact the maintainer
> of the package for a fix.  If they can't get a response within 24 or
> 48 hours, they would make a non-maintainer release.

Yes, I'd be infavour of that too.

Although I really like seeing those security messages, I'd hate
for them to deside to remove security@debian.org from their list
because it's distributed to too many people.


-- 
joost witteveen, joostje@debian.org
#!/usr/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj
$/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1
lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/)
#what's this? see http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .