The debian-private mailing list leak, part 1. Volunteers have complained about Blackmail. Lynchings. Character assassination. Defamation. Cyberbullying. Volunteers who gave many years of their lives are picked out at random for cruel social experiments. The former DPL's girlfriend Molly de Blanc is given volunteers to experiment on for her crazy talks. These volunteers never consented to be used like lab rats. We don't either. debian-private can no longer be a safe space for the cabal. Let these monsters have nowhere to hide. Volunteers are not disposable. We stand with the victims.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

I'll stay [Re: There is no leadership vaccumm.]

Christian Schwarz:
> It looks like you don't give me any other choice, so I'll continue
> with the work as Policy Manager.  Thanks a lot for your support!

Thanks for your time.

> I still see a need for specifying limits to the number of packages in
> our distribution. The other reactions have shown me that I'm not the
> only one who requests that. If you agree with me, I'll prepare and
> start a discussion about that in a few weeks. If we get a majority
> about defining a "core" part of the system, we should probably do this
> for Debian 2.1.

This discussion should take place on debian-devel, probably.

When you start that discussion, can you think about how this would be
distinct from our current separation of packages by `priority' ?  For
example, you could just say that everything Standard or better or
Optional or better was the `core'.

What different treatment would the non-core packages receive ?

Ian.


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-private-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .