Development
Category:Comes v Microsoft
Category:Antitrust
Category:Microsoft
This index deals with Comes vs Microsoft court exhibits which offer a glance at the history of Microsoft abuse. For a concise summary of some of the exhibits, see "Petition text - overview".
Microsoft developers used undocumented APIs (Exhibit PX01614)
Microsoft "undocumentation" (Exhibit supp_rpt_andrew_schulman, Iowa)
Undocumentated API functions found in WINDOWS.H (Exhibit PX05084)
Redacted undocumentated APIs (Exhibit PX04600)
Keep the formats closed (Exhibit px05035)
Embrace our UI innovations (Exhibit px03073)
Style guide biased towards Microsoft apps (Exhibit PX00956)
The dangers of open Interfaces (Exhibit PX02003)
We want OpenDOC to fail (Exhibit PX02026)
Most ugly garbage since COM/OLE (Exhibit PX02563)
Yet more undocumented API calls (Exhibit PX02667)
Winning API wars (Exhibit PX02783)
Microsoft 'quality control' (Exhibit PX04141)
Microsoft: developers are a one-night stand (Exhibit/transcript VolumeXXV-January52007 -- MISSING)
How Bill Gates Denied Access to Office File Format Documentation to Stifle Competition
https://techrights.org/o/2008/09/27/judge-finds-microsoft-undocumentation-unimpressive/
https://techrights.org/o/2008/03/25/dynamic-ms-standards/
https://techrights.org/o/2008/03/11/interoperability-promise-a-scam/
https://techrights.org/o/2008/02/22/novell-vista-sp1-compatibility/
Microsoft on “Embrace and Extend”, the “Windows API Franchise”
Nathan Myhrvold/Bill Gates Use “Embrace and Extend” Against “Making it Easy for People to Do Competitive Operating Systems”
Comes Antitrust: How Microsoft Schemed to Destroy Borland (Like It Did Yahoo!)