OpenLogic
From Techrights
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*[http://techrights.org/2008/06/16/open-source-census-credibility/ The Open Source ‘Census’ Lost Its Credibility] | *[http://techrights.org/2008/06/16/open-source-census-credibility/ The Open Source ‘Census’ Lost Its Credibility] | ||
*[http://techrights.org/2010/11/01/groundreport-on-openlogic/ Good News, Bad News From OpenLogic] | *[http://techrights.org/2010/11/01/groundreport-on-openlogic/ Good News, Bad News From OpenLogic] | ||
| + | *[http://techrights.org/2011/05/19/openlogic-on-licensing/ Firms With Microsoft Ties Discourage Use of the GPL Licence] | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Microsoft Proxies]] | [[Category:Microsoft Proxies]] | ||
Revision as of 17:54, 19 May 2011
- FUD Watch: OpenLogic Survey Shows Enterprises Should be Afraid of GPL
- GMOME, OpenLogic, and the Microsoft Connection
- OpenLogic — Like Novell — Supports Red Hat Clone
- Looking for Violations in Free Software: Fearsome or Awesome?
- “GPL is Scary!! Please Buy Our Products”
- Microsoft’s Ally Fortify is Fortifying Fear of Free Software, Just Like OpenLogic and Black Duck
- The Open Source ‘Census’ Lost Its Credibility
- Good News, Bad News From OpenLogic
- Firms With Microsoft Ties Discourage Use of the GPL Licence
