Software Patents in New Zealand

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(changed to reverse chronological order so that freshest material is at the top)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
== April 2010 ==
+
== October 2011 ==
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/01/radio-stations-nz-vs-swpat/ Nation of New Zealand Shows the Way Regarding Software Patentability]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/10/18/ms-apple-patent-attacks/ Microsoft and Apple: The Bounty and the Beast] (more Microsoft lobbying in NZ)
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/11/hammerstein-eu-harrison-leads-lobbying-nz/ Harrison Targets Lobbying on Software Patents in New Zealand, Justice Stevens Leaves SCOTUS]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/10/04/english-speaking-countries-and-swpats/ Update on Software Patents in the US, Australia, and New Zealand]
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/12/turbohercules-based-in-seattle/ Oink of the Patent Lawyers in New Zealand]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/14/msft-harassing-competition-swpat/ Patents Roundup: IBM, TurboHercules, Microsoft, New Zealand, Palm, and CompTIA]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/09/nz-attack-of-the-patent-lawyers/ New Zealand’s Software Industry Under Attack by the ‘Patent Leeches’]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/10/upls-and-turbohercules/ NZOSS Responds to Pro-Software Patents Lobbyists]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/15/nzict-and-intergen-lobby-for-swpats/ “Microsoft Sending Its Business Partners (Like in OOXML) in New Zealand to Push for Software Patents”]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/16/orion-on-swpat-hartmut-pilch-on-ecj/ Patents Roundup: New Zealand’s Largest Application Vendor Rejects Software Patents...]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/17/new-zealand-nzcs-rejects-swpats/ The New Zealand Computer Society Opposes Software Patents]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/saddling-sw-with-legal-expenses/ The Legal ‘Industry’ of Software Patents]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/acta-trips-patents/ NZOSS Responds to the Software Patents Lobby] (bottom part)
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/23/patents-stomp-on-life/ "Labour party in New Zealand openly opposes software patents"]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/25/swpats-interfering-with-economic-sense/ Patents Roundup: Patent Absurdity More Widely Understood, New Zealand’s Case Against Them Made Clearer, and Why Free Software Must Reject Them]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/29/software-patents-imperialism/ Software Patents Imperialism]
+
-
== May 2010 ==
+
== August 2011 ==
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/05/07/ipmentor-and-michel-barnier-obstacle/ ‘IP’ People Want to Add Software Patents to New Zealand and Europe]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/08/12/don-christie-on-swpats/ New Zealand’s Software Patents Debate on Television]
-
== June 2010 ==
+
== June 2011 ==
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/06/24/us-lawyer-drones-vs-nz/ New Zealand’s Legislation Regarding Software Patents Shows That the US is the Boss]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/29/multinationals-ask-for-yet-more-leeway/ New Zealand’s Patent Law Has Room for Improvement]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/24/simon-power-commended/ Pirate Party of New Zealand Points the Finger at Microsoft for Pro-Software Patents Lobbying]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/21/empire-strikes-back-vs-nz/ USPTO is Driving Away Businesses to Countries Like New Zealand, US-based Multinationals Attack New Zealand With Imperialistic Patent Lobbying to Assimilate Policies]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/18/simon-power-on-swpats/ New Zealand Beats Software Patents Legality]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/16/nzoss-milestone/ New Zealand Open Source Society Beats Microsoft’s Software Patent]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/13/intel-for-swpats/ Intel and Microsoft Attack Freedom of Software Developers by Defending/Lobbying for Software Patents in New Zealand]
-
== July 2010 ==
+
== April 2011 ==
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/20/i-ponzi-on-swpats/ New Zealand’s Intellectual Monopoly Office Wants Software Patents, With Caveats]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/04/19/microsoft-swpats-lobby-in-nz/ Microsoft is Directly — Not Just Indirectly — Lobbying for Software Patents in New Zealand]
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/21/ben-sturmfel-vs-swpats/ Help Extend the Ban on Software Patents in New Zealand to Australia]
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/26/software-patents-loopholes/ Why New Zealand Should Also Abolish Patents on 'Embedded Software']
+
-
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/28/techinsights-teaches-re-swpats/ ‘Harmonisation’ Tricks Down Under; TechInsights Explains How to ‘Cheat’ and Patent Software]
+
-
== August 2010 ==
+
== March 2011 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2010/08/25/nzict-and-microsoft-gold-partner/ NZICT is a Fake Group (Lobby Group) Connected to Microsoft, Foreigners]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/03/30/epo-and-nzict/ ”In Europe Microsoft Have Been Putting Significant Resources in Backing The Setting Up Of the European Patent Office“]
-
== October 2010 ==
+
== February 2011 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2010/10/20/nz-canada-swpats/ New Zealand Has a Software Patents Debate, Canada Wrestles With Business Method Patents]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/02/09/nz-and-eu-vs-swpats/ New Zealand and Europe Should Both Actively Fight Against Software Patents]
-
*[http://techrights.org/2010/10/21/uspto-inspired-swpats-issue/ US Patent Colonisation: EPO Promotes Machine Translation, New Zealand Still Resistant]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2011/02/07/patent-lawyers-vs-foss/ Belittling the ‘Open Source Community’ for Stance on Patents, Worshipping Microsoft Patents]
== December 2010 ==
== December 2010 ==
Line 44: Line 34:
*[http://techrights.org/2010/12/23/new-zealand-swpats-threat/ “Software Patents to Get Their Way in New Zealand”]
*[http://techrights.org/2010/12/23/new-zealand-swpats-threat/ “Software Patents to Get Their Way in New Zealand”]
-
== February 2011 ==
+
== October 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/02/07/patent-lawyers-vs-foss/ Belittling the ‘Open Source Community’ for Stance on Patents, Worshipping Microsoft Patents]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2010/10/21/uspto-inspired-swpats-issue/ US Patent Colonisation: EPO Promotes Machine Translation, New Zealand Still Resistant]
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/02/09/nz-and-eu-vs-swpats/ New Zealand and Europe Should Both Actively Fight Against Software Patents]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2010/10/20/nz-canada-swpats/ New Zealand Has a Software Patents Debate, Canada Wrestles With Business Method Patents]
-
== March 2011 ==
+
== August 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/03/30/epo-and-nzict/ ”In Europe Microsoft Have Been Putting Significant Resources in Backing The Setting Up Of the European Patent Office“]
+
*[http://techrights.org/2010/08/25/nzict-and-microsoft-gold-partner/ NZICT is a Fake Group (Lobby Group) Connected to Microsoft, Foreigners]
-
== April 2011 ==
+
== July 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/04/19/microsoft-swpats-lobby-in-nz/ Microsoft is Directly — Not Just Indirectly — Lobbying for Software Patents in New Zealand]
+
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/28/techinsights-teaches-re-swpats/ ‘Harmonisation’ Tricks Down Under; TechInsights Explains How to ‘Cheat’ and Patent Software]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/26/software-patents-loopholes/ Why New Zealand Should Also Abolish Patents on 'Embedded Software']
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/21/ben-sturmfel-vs-swpats/ Help Extend the Ban on Software Patents in New Zealand to Australia]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/07/20/i-ponzi-on-swpats/ New Zealand’s Intellectual Monopoly Office Wants Software Patents, With Caveats]
-
== June 2011 ==
+
== June 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/13/intel-for-swpats/ Intel and Microsoft Attack Freedom of Software Developers by Defending/Lobbying for Software Patents in New Zealand]
+
* [http://techrights.org/2010/06/24/us-lawyer-drones-vs-nz/ New Zealand’s Legislation Regarding Software Patents Shows That the US is the Boss]
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/16/nzoss-milestone/ New Zealand Open Source Society Beats Microsoft’s Software Patent]
+
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/18/simon-power-on-swpats/ New Zealand Beats Software Patents Legality]
+
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/21/empire-strikes-back-vs-nz/ USPTO is Driving Away Businesses to Countries Like New Zealand, US-based Multinationals Attack New Zealand With Imperialistic Patent Lobbying to Assimilate Policies]
+
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/24/simon-power-commended/ Pirate Party of New Zealand Points the Finger at Microsoft for Pro-Software Patents Lobbying]
+
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/06/29/multinationals-ask-for-yet-more-leeway/ New Zealand’s Patent Law Has Room for Improvement]
+
-
== August 2011 ==
+
== May 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/08/12/don-christie-on-swpats/ New Zealand’s Software Patents Debate on Television]
+
* [http://techrights.org/2010/05/07/ipmentor-and-michel-barnier-obstacle/ ‘IP’ People Want to Add Software Patents to New Zealand and Europe]
-
== October 2011 ==
+
== April 2010 ==
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/10/04/english-speaking-countries-and-swpats/ Update on Software Patents in the US, Australia, and New Zealand]
+
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/29/software-patents-imperialism/ Software Patents Imperialism]
-
*[http://techrights.org/2011/10/18/ms-apple-patent-attacks/ Microsoft and Apple: The Bounty and the Beast] (more Microsoft lobbying in NZ)
+
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/25/swpats-interfering-with-economic-sense/ Patents Roundup: Patent Absurdity More Widely Understood, New Zealand’s Case Against Them Made Clearer, and Why Free Software Must Reject Them]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/23/patents-stomp-on-life/ "Labour party in New Zealand openly opposes software patents"]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/acta-trips-patents/ NZOSS Responds to the Software Patents Lobby] (bottom part)
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/saddling-sw-with-legal-expenses/ The Legal ‘Industry’ of Software Patents]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/17/new-zealand-nzcs-rejects-swpats/ The New Zealand Computer Society Opposes Software Patents]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/16/orion-on-swpat-hartmut-pilch-on-ecj/ Patents Roundup: New Zealand’s Largest Application Vendor Rejects Software Patents...]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/15/nzict-and-intergen-lobby-for-swpats/ “Microsoft Sending Its Business Partners (Like in OOXML) in New Zealand to Push for Software Patents”]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/10/upls-and-turbohercules/ NZOSS Responds to Pro-Software Patents Lobbyists]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/09/nz-attack-of-the-patent-lawyers/ New Zealand’s Software Industry Under Attack by the ‘Patent Leeches’]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/14/msft-harassing-competition-swpat/ Patents Roundup: IBM, TurboHercules, Microsoft, New Zealand, Palm, and CompTIA]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/12/turbohercules-based-in-seattle/ Oink of the Patent Lawyers in New Zealand]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/11/hammerstein-eu-harrison-leads-lobbying-nz/ Harrison Targets Lobbying on Software Patents in New Zealand, Justice Stevens Leaves SCOTUS]
 +
* [http://techrights.org/2010/04/01/radio-stations-nz-vs-swpat/ Nation of New Zealand Shows the Way Regarding Software Patentability]

Revision as of 11:39, 19 October 2011

Contents

October 2011

August 2011

June 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

December 2010

October 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories