UEFI

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(2022)
Current revision (20:51, 29 September 2022) (view source)
 
Line 4: Line 4:
== 2022 ==
== 2022 ==
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2022/09/29/no-protection-for-linux-from-monopolies/ No Protection for Linux Offered by the So-called 'Linux' Foundation]
*[http://techrights.org/2022/09/19/only-fools-and-horses-microsoft/ Meme: Only Fools and Horses Work for Microsoft Without a Salary]
*[http://techrights.org/2022/09/19/only-fools-and-horses-microsoft/ Meme: Only Fools and Horses Work for Microsoft Without a Salary]
*[http://techrights.org/2022/09/19/disastrous-security-arguments/ Software Freedom is Not a Disaster and Those Who Oppose B.Y.O.D. Are a Monarch's Dream]
*[http://techrights.org/2022/09/19/disastrous-security-arguments/ Software Freedom is Not a Disaster and Those Who Oppose B.Y.O.D. Are a Monarch's Dream]

Current revision

Secure Boot, UEFI 'security', or "Restricted Boot" as the FSF calls it (for the goal is not really security but control and domination by a remote/distant vendor), is a great threat to computing freedom. It was covered in the following posts over the years.

Contents

2022

2021

2020

2016

2015

2014

November

September

June

May

April

March

February

January

2013

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

May

April

March

February

January

2012

December

November

October

September

August

July

June

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories