UEFI
From Techrights
(Difference between revisions)
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* [http://techrights.org/2012/12/05/supporting-uefi-in-2012-is-like-supporting-ooxml-in-2007/ Supporting UEFI in 2012 is Like Supporting OOXML in 2007] | * [http://techrights.org/2012/12/05/supporting-uefi-in-2012-is-like-supporting-ooxml-in-2007/ Supporting UEFI in 2012 is Like Supporting OOXML in 2007] | ||
* [http://techrights.org/2012/12/11/win8-is-botched/ Vista 8 Continues to Fail, But Succeeds at Suppressing GNU and Linux Installs] | * [http://techrights.org/2012/12/11/win8-is-botched/ Vista 8 Continues to Fail, But Succeeds at Suppressing GNU and Linux Installs] | ||
+ | * [http://techrights.org/2012/12/30/uefi-and-fight-vs-open-pc/ Vista 8 Fails This Xmas, UEFI Blocks GNU and Linux While Microsoft Tries Collecting in China, Stopping Sales of Open PCs] |
Revision as of 01:50, 31 December 2012
Secure Boot, UEFI, or "Restricted Boot" as the FSF calls it, is a threat to computing freedom. It was covered in the following posts.
- Microsoft Dictatorship Divides and Conquers Linux With Novell, Red Hat, and Ubuntu
- Red Hat Does Not Want to Defend Its Position on UEFI
- Restricted Boot Arguably Fought Against by Linux, Not Just GNU
- UEFI Problems Addressed by Linux Developers, Not Distributions
- TechBytes Episode 69: Richard Stallman on ‘Secure’ Boot (UEFI), Coreboot, GRUB, and Boot Freedom
- UEFI Debate Rages on While New Workarounds and Advice Surface
- Debian Follows the FSF’s — Not Red Hat’s — Footsteps Regarding UEFI
- FSF and FSFE Both Speak Out Against UEFI; Ubuntu Drifts Away From FSF, Whereas Debian Comes Closer to FSF
- Features of Vista 8 Focused on Errors, Antifeatures
- Canonical and Red Hat Receive Negative Publicity Over Submissive UEFI Choices
- Coverage of the Free Software Foundation’s Response to UEFI
- The FSF Moves From Petition to Recommendations Regarding UEFI Fight
- With UEFI, Microsoft Assaults the General Public License (GPL) and Computing Freedom in General
- Answers to Microsoft’s UEFI Plot Summarised, More Pretence That Microsoft is ‘Open’
- Vista 8 Will Drive More OEMs to GNU/Linux
- FSF Says Microsoft’s Flagging of Its Site as ‘Gambling’ is Wrong; FSF’s Anti-UEFI Petition Grows Popular, Debian Joins
- Ubuntu and UEFI
- Red Hat Fails to Convince That UEFI is Tolerable, Uses ‘Security’ as Talking Point
- Red Hat Was Wrong About UEFI, Failed to Ask the Users
- Linus Torvalds Disputes Security of UEFI
- Red Hat Criticised for Advancing Microsoft’s UEFI Agenda
- Microsoft’s Monopolistic Abuses Continue as Red Hat and Fedora Tax Are Put in Place
- Microsoft Corporation — Not Just Microsoft Windows — a SPAM Leader; UEFI Not the Answer
- Microsoft Cannot Defend UEFI
- SUSE to Help Microsoft With UEFI Agenda
- The Early Demise of Vista 8 and the Obsolescence of UEFI
- Ubuntu Acknowledges UEFI Mistake by Taking FSF Advice
- Microsoft Breaks the Web and Linux
- Linux Wins the Devices OS War, Microsoft Tries to Lock it Out With UEFI
- Microsoft Can’t Understand Security (Lesson for UEFI Apologists)
- Ubuntu Decided to Stay With GPLv3 After Public Backlash
- Garrett a Microsoft Apologist
- Vista 8 is Not Selling, But Microsoft’s UEFI Scheme Blocks Linux Installations/Booting
- Microsoft Proves Techrights Right by Screwing UEFI ‘Partners’
- New PCs Cannot Boot Linux Due to Microsoft Dirty Tricks
- Vista 8 Signals the End of Windows Domination; Microsoft Starts Lying (Fake Numbers), Block GNU/Linux
- UEFI Apologists Versus Germany’s Government Judgment on UEFI Insecurity
- New Reports Show How Microsoft Rendered New Hardware Linux-hostile Out of the Box Using UEFI Demands
- Guest Post: UEFI’s Effects on the User
- Supporting UEFI in 2012 is Like Supporting OOXML in 2007
- Vista 8 Continues to Fail, But Succeeds at Suppressing GNU and Linux Installs
- Vista 8 Fails This Xmas, UEFI Blocks GNU and Linux While Microsoft Tries Collecting in China, Stopping Sales of Open PCs