USPTO

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 191: Line 191:
*[http://techrights.org/2017/06/25/joseph-matal-vs-drew-hirshfeld/ The US Patent Office (USPTO) Should Now be Headed by Drew Hirshfeld, a Patent Examiner Who Rose to the Top, Not a Lawyer Like Joseph Matal]
*[http://techrights.org/2017/06/25/joseph-matal-vs-drew-hirshfeld/ The US Patent Office (USPTO) Should Now be Headed by Drew Hirshfeld, a Patent Examiner Who Rose to the Top, Not a Lawyer Like Joseph Matal]
*[http://techrights.org/2017/07/27/uspto-report-on-section-101/ The USPTO Report on Section 101 is Somewhat Farcical as Input Comes From the Patent Microcosm, Not Producing Companies]
*[http://techrights.org/2017/07/27/uspto-report-on-section-101/ The USPTO Report on Section 101 is Somewhat Farcical as Input Comes From the Patent Microcosm, Not Producing Companies]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2017/08/01/the-section-101-uspto-report/ The Section 101 USPTO 'Debate' (for a 'Report') is a Bunch of Lawyers Debating Among Themselves, No Engineers/Scientists Involved]

Revision as of 10:38, 1 August 2017

The USPTO grants monopolies on ideas, including algorithms (since Martin Goetz started it). Under the leadership of David Kappos it has done nothing substantial to appease critics and limit patent scope. We also wrote on the subject in the following writings.

Contents

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories