USPTO

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(2018)
Line 227: Line 227:
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/09/prior-art-searches/ The USPTO's Principal Issue is Abstract Patents (or Patent Scope), Not Prior Art Searches]
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/09/prior-art-searches/ The USPTO's Principal Issue is Abstract Patents (or Patent Scope), Not Prior Art Searches]
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/14/fee-setting-uspto/ USPTO FEES Act/SUCCESS Act Gives More Powers to Director Iancu, Supplying Patents for Litigation 'Business' and Embargo (ITC)]
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/14/fee-setting-uspto/ USPTO FEES Act/SUCCESS Act Gives More Powers to Director Iancu, Supplying Patents for Litigation 'Business' and Embargo (ITC)]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/29/making-patents-low-quality/ USPTO Under Iancu: Making Patents Low Quality (Again)]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2018/10/29/court-bashing-uspto-director/ PTAB- And Court-Bashing USPTO Director Consistent With 'Presidential' Behaviour in Age of Donald Trump]

Revision as of 08:37, 29 October 2018

The USPTO grants monopolies on ideas, including algorithms (since Martin Goetz started it). Under the leadership of David Kappos it has done nothing substantial to appease critics and limit patent scope. We also wrote on the subject in the following writings.

Contents

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories