USPTO

From Techrights

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(2019)
Line 245: Line 245:
*[http://techrights.org/2019/04/22/uspto-and-epo-both-slammed/ USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics]
*[http://techrights.org/2019/04/22/uspto-and-epo-both-slammed/ USPTO and EPO Both Slammed for Abandoning Patent Quality and Violating the Law/Caselaw in Order to Grant Illegitimate Patents on Life/Nature and Mathematics]
*[http://techrights.org/2019/08/29/lawless-patent-systems/ USPTO and EPO: Call Software Patents 'Hey Hi' ('AI') and Use Microsoft Software (or Else!)]
*[http://techrights.org/2019/08/29/lawless-patent-systems/ USPTO and EPO: Call Software Patents 'Hey Hi' ('AI') and Use Microsoft Software (or Else!)]
 +
*[http://techrights.org/2019/11/16/uspto-ooxml/ USPTO Rewards Microsoft for Corruption at ISO by Teaching People Proprietary OOXML and Promoting Its Use]

Revision as of 03:30, 17 November 2019

The USPTO, currently headed by Director Andrei Iancu grants monopolies on ideas, including algorithms (since Martin Goetz started it). Under the leadership of David Kappos it has done nothing substantial to appease critics and limit patent scope. We also wrote on the subject in the following writings.

Contents

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Personal tools
Search entire domain
Stories