Comments on: OOXML is Patent Trap, Royalties Render it Obsolete http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-3/#comment-43713 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:56:15 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43713 Sydney,

re Bilski has already done the trick.

]]>
By: salvin http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-3/#comment-43710 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:38:28 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43710 Oh, don’t you try to be _rational_ with Roy; he doesn’t like that… ;)

]]>
By: Sydney Sider http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-3/#comment-43705 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 23:28:14 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43705 Think rationally about this for a moment Roy. Is there a single case of Microsoft suing over a software patient? They moment they did most of their portfolio would be either toast or at risk.

]]>
By: jo Shields http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-2/#comment-43645 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 21:07:06 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43645

Novell’s OOXML translator is a Trojan horse for Mono, i.e. more Microsoft patents.

You’re behaving more unhinged than usual. This is an impressive feat.

Novell’s deprecated OOXML support for OOo 2.x (no longer needed, since Sun have their own support in 3.x) has never had the slightest thing to do with Mono. It doesn’t require it, or use it.

And, for a change, your link has nothing to do with the point you’re making.

Seriously, it’s gone past silly now. Are you on something?

]]>
By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-2/#comment-43532 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:42:03 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43532 I bet Jonathan I. Schwartz and Steve Ballmer take nude sauna sessions together!! Shameless treason! Flail them! We want blood! ;ppp

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]>
By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-2/#comment-43531 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:39:57 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43531 What’s the difference??!?, they’ve included the ‘OOXML-trap’ in the mainline code, and they have received millions of dollars from eeeevil Micro$oft!!!! ;p

Let them feel the sacred wrath of righeous FLOSS crusaders like your humble self…

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-2/#comment-43529 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:37:51 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43529 Not about GNU/Linux and does not involve Mono/.NET and OOXML.

]]>
By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-2/#comment-43525 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:34:05 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43525 How about voting SUN out of OOo altogether because they have sealed a patent-agreement with Microsoft?

http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/press/2004/apr04/04-02SunAgreementPR.mspx
http://articles.techrepublic.com.com/5100-22_11-5188082.html

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]>
By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-1/#comment-43520 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:27:14 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43520 …and the code for opening and saving to .DOC, too, of course!

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]>
By: stevetheFLY http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-1/#comment-43519 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 16:26:42 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43519 Yeah, and tell SUN to remove their own OOXML-code, too…

Note: comment has been flagged for arriving from an incarnation of a known (eet), pseudonymous, forever-nymshifting, abusive Internet troll that posts from open proxies and relays around the world.

]]>
By: AlexH http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-1/#comment-43432 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:44:27 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43432 We should petition to have this dangerous patent risk removed from OpenOffice.org immediately.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-1/#comment-43426 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:23:38 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43426 Novell’s OOXML translator is a Trojan horse for Mono, i.e. more Microsoft patents.

]]>
By: jo Shields http://techrights.org/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/comment-page-1/#comment-43418 Sat, 06 Dec 2008 13:19:03 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/06/ooxml-patent-royalties/#comment-43418 Why the Mono logo? What does it have to do with this “article”

]]>