Comments on: Patents Against Linux/Android and the Hypocrisy of Microsoft, Apple http://techrights.org/2012/04/07/hypocrisy-from-duopoly/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Michael http://techrights.org/2012/04/07/hypocrisy-from-duopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-132812 Mon, 09 Apr 2012 00:40:18 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=59620#comment-132812

If Apple is not a monopolist,

There is no "if" involved: Apple is not a monopolist. Period.

it is certainly not from a lack of trying.

In the same way this can be said of any company trying to grow its market share, I guess. But Apple does not even really chase market share like other companies, at least not with its Mac line. Is there *any* segment where they have the majority share? Tablets, I suppose – but I think it is clear that this will change as we see Android lower end, lower priced devices (and some higher end ones at similar prices. And the primary reason Apple has such a high share there is that they earned it – there were other tablets out there long before Apple had theirs. Apple is "evil" in that they made a better device than the competition… how dare they! I mean, really, to whine about them being a"monopolist" in this area is just silly. It is like saying Linux is a monopoly because it has areas where it clearly has the majority of markets. Oh well. Linux, like the Apple products, has earned respect for many purposes. You do not see people from Apple (or any others I know of) making the same whiney noises you are making.

Apple patented ideas that are clearly trivial, obvious, and often prior art; then apple used those bogus patents to keep competitors out of the market.

Same repeated BS… you ignore the other side: Apple defending itself from being plagiarized… something they have every right (and some legal obligation in some areas) to do.

I have already proved this is true, so don’t keep asking for proof when I have already provided it. Read my old posts.

You have not proved this true. If you have, link to it. But you will not. Not even you believe this BS, you repeat it to keep Roy and his cult-like group happy. As far as the accusations of plagiarism, I have repeatedly showed the evidence in terms of Samsung. Many times. I am happy to link to it: http://techrights.org/2011/11/10/barnes-and-noble-vs-msft/#comment-131678
You see, when people have actual evidence they are happy to show it. You will not even try… face it, your actions indicate you do not believe our own claims. Roy has talked about his envy of Apple. Seems you share that trait with him.

]]>
By: walterbyrd http://techrights.org/2012/04/07/hypocrisy-from-duopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-132809 Sun, 08 Apr 2012 22:12:45 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=59620#comment-132809 If Apple is not a monopolist, it is certainly not from a lack of trying. Apple patented ideas that are clearly trivial, obvious, and often prior art; then apple used those bogus patents to keep competitors out of the market.

I have already proved this is true, so don’t keep asking for proof when I have already provided it. Read my old posts.

]]>
By: Michael http://techrights.org/2012/04/07/hypocrisy-from-duopoly/comment-page-1/#comment-132793 Sun, 08 Apr 2012 05:28:27 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=59620#comment-132793 Apple… a monopolist?

A monopolist cannot have only a small percentage of the market – by definition. In most of the markets Apple is in, they have well less than 50% of the market share.

Really… you are just spewing nonsense.

]]>