Comments on: OpenSUSE Release Candidate Acting up http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Slated http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-3/#comment-52681 Sat, 20 Dec 2008 22:33:38 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-52681 @Dan O’Brian

“Jump to Conclusions” mat (reference to Office Space”

Great film. Maybe the same thing happened (hypnosis) to Novell to make them not give a damn about the Free Software community any more, and then jump into bed with Microsoft.

I can just see Sweaty Ballmer as the hypnotherapist; a big wad of cash in one hand, and grease-gun in the other.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-3/#comment-51482 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 12:00:52 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51482 Chris, I’ve just brought them out of the filter’s queue. They are sometimes wrongly classified and await moderation.

]]>
By: Chris http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-3/#comment-51477 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 11:54:44 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51477 Congrats Boy, looks like you perhaps found a bug.

Now please post a link to the bug report that is surely made so this can be fixed …

PS: My apologies if this shows up more than once but I’m actually trying it for ~6th time since it doesn’t show up but says something about double posting.

Did you add some comment moderation or is it just borked atm?

]]>
By: Chris http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-3/#comment-51393 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:47:48 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51393 Congrats Boy, looks like you perhaps found a bug.

Now please link to the bug report that is surely made so this can be fixed …

]]>
By: Chris http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-2/#comment-51392 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:44:52 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51392 Congrats Boy, looks like you perhaps found a bug.

Now please link to the bug report that’s surely made so this can be fixed …

]]>
By: Rod http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-2/#comment-51154 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:20:25 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51154 Doesn’t do it on my machine. I’m not using Compiz, tho’.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-2/#comment-51144 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:09:05 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51144 I see you’re enjoying your new company.

]]>
By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-2/#comment-51141 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 01:00:34 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51141 Wow, you guys sure do love your “Jump to Conclusions” mat (reference to Office Space, for those who don’t get it).

That said, iirc, past Michael comments have typically taken your side, so perhaps I shouldn’t be pointing this out. Afterall, after your childish attacks on him, perhaps he’d be more inclined to agree with Alex, Jo, G. Michaels and myself?

]]>
By: Slated http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-2/#comment-51138 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:51:51 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51138 Oh look, it seems we’ve exposed “Michael” as an astroturfer.

He must be from Microsoft rather than their bed-partners Novell, because at least the shills from Novell would know there was never any such distro as “redhat 10″.

I suppose he’ll just have to change his nym now. “Steve Barkto”, anyone.

]]>
By: Diamond Wakizashi http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-1/#comment-51136 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:50:38 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51136 Maybe Novell should ask Microsoft for help.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-1/#comment-51132 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:42:41 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51132 Yes, I know. But why would someone who tried Fedora 10 call it “redhat 10″, unless it wasn’t really tried?

]]>
By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-1/#comment-51131 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:38:30 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51131 likely means fedora 10

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-1/#comment-51125 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:04:01 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51125 Red Hat 10?

]]>
By: Michael http://techrights.org/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/comment-page-1/#comment-51123 Thu, 18 Dec 2008 00:01:44 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/17/opensuse-bug-video/#comment-51123 Had similar screen corruption on redhat 10 when I tried using compiz. Wasn’t really an issue, although some other bug meant over time the system got slower and slower, so I stopped using it. I wasn’t fond of burning my legs either.

]]>