Comments on: Quick Mention: Novell’s Mono Evolves and Approaches Evolution http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Mark Fink http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-2/#comment-6337 Sat, 01 Mar 2008 20:47:27 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6337 Figures that Jeff Waugh lied about how GNOME would never depend on Mono.

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6192 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:53:27 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6192 Rui, I’ve just posted this clarification.

]]> By: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6191 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:48:54 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6191 Might begin with ‘Se’, ends in ‘Out’ and has ‘ll-’ in the middle, but I don’t promise this is what I’m thinking about…

]]> By: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6190 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:47:29 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6190 Which makes Miguel, what? I have a word for that…

]]> By: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6189 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:46:28 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6189 They said it in here:

http://www.microsoft.com/interop/principles/osspatentpledge.mspx

Where they also redefine OpenSource to be:
0. non commercial
1. freely redistributed
2. freely modified
3. source code published

]]> By: CoolGuy http://techrights.org/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-6183 Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:52:20 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/27/evolution-mono-extensions/#comment-6183 http://tirania.org/blog//texts/patents.html

Microsoft has granted RAND+Royalty Free licenses to any patents they might own that are required to implement the ECMA 334/335 standards. So at least our core VM, classes and compilers are safe from any litigation from *Microsoft*.

When did they say that ?

]]>