Comments on: Another Company Affiliated with Microsoft Sues Red Hat Using Software Patents http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: David Gerard http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/comment-page-1/#comment-60211 Thu, 05 Mar 2009 16:27:52 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/#comment-60211 I mean, of course, against users ;-p Specifically internal software developers at companies, who are the 95% of developers who *don’t* work on shrinkwrapped software.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/comment-page-1/#comment-60207 Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:17:33 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/#comment-60207

.NET faces an uphill battle and no-one takes it seriously.

Must you really insult Novell?

]]>
By: David Gerard http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/comment-page-1/#comment-60206 Thu, 05 Mar 2009 15:00:09 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/#comment-60206 Note that this is two competitors for the price of one: Red Hat and Java.

In real commercial server use, Java is everywhere. .NET faces an uphill battle and no-one takes it seriously.

]]>
By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/comment-page-1/#comment-60194 Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:54:05 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/#comment-60194 Don’t you know? Microsoft are like the Illuminati, they are everywhere and they are nowhere. They control everything.

]]>
By: Gentoo User http://techrights.org/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/comment-page-1/#comment-60184 Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:10:05 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2009/03/04/software-tree-vs-red-hat-jboss/#comment-60184 I noticed the other day you wrote an entire post based on Slashdot comments (some of which I think you later mentioned you had modded up), so here’s an interesting one I noticed on the discussion of this topic over there this morning. To quote (because it’s really good):

Yay for selective quoting! (Score:5, Informative) … on Wednesday March 04, @08:44AM (#27065889)

“Software Tree’s partners include Microsoft, IBM, Borland, and Sun”

Fixed that for you.

Another, as a reply to that one:

Only their website doesn’t even mention Microsoft as a partner. IBM, Borland, Sun and Oracle are mentioned as partners, though, with contact details.

What was the intention of mentioning Microsoft and leaving out those partners? Is Microsoft a business partner at all?

I hate software patents. But summaries like this blatantly trying to skew facts to weasel in hints of a grand Microsoft conspiracy does the fight against software patents disservice.

What a crook. Bad! I had to look twice because I fully expected this to be a “kdawson”. Not this time, though.

I assume these people must work for Microsoft, as you are keen on quickly pointing out in cases like these.

]]>