Comments on: Mono a Second-Class Citizen Even on GNU/Linux http://techrights.org/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Chris http://techrights.org/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-54686 Wed, 24 Dec 2008 19:50:17 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/#comment-54686 And if you wiener actually read that bugreport, you had read:

1. It will be implemented

2. There is an automated process that reports missing functions.

So you point is pretty invalid …

]]> By: David Gerard http://techrights.org/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-54631 Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:27:22 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/#comment-54631 Q. Why does Mono suck?

A. Because Novell don’t consider missing functions in Mono that break real apps reportable bugs. o_0

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-54267 Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:49:04 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/#comment-54267 It also means monkey though.

]]> By: Diamond Wakizashi http://techrights.org/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/comment-page-1/#comment-54265 Tue, 23 Dec 2008 20:09:25 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/12/23/second-class-novellsoft-ide/#comment-54265 Microsoft’s bitch Novell picked a VERY accurate name for their poison.

Mono dictionary definition: “infectious mononucleosis”

]]>