Comments on: More on Novell’s Mixed-Source Model http://techrights.org/2007/01/02/more-on-novells-mixed-source-model/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Shane Coyle http://techrights.org/2007/01/02/more-on-novells-mixed-source-model/comment-page-1/#comment-199 Wed, 03 Jan 2007 06:12:56 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/01/02/more-on-novells-mixed-source-model/#comment-199

This sounds like Novell is planning on mixing proprietary code with GPL’d code. Isn’t that a violation of the GPL?

Not necessarily, as I understand it anyhow.

OOO is LGPL and therefore there is alot they can do in terms of linking proprietary code and whatnot and be able to distribute it.

For their other stuff, like identity management or whatever, they just don’t distribute them ‘linked together’ with a GPL product. GPL is only distribution, not an EULA, users can load/run whatever they want.

I haven’t any problem with a mixed-source approach, honestly, as long as its done right. I have a huge problem with the patent covenant license exploit that Novell and Microsoft colluded on.

]]>
By: wvhillbilly http://techrights.org/2007/01/02/more-on-novells-mixed-source-model/comment-page-1/#comment-198 Tue, 02 Jan 2007 23:26:48 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2007/01/02/more-on-novells-mixed-source-model/#comment-198 This sounds like Novell is planning on mixing proprietary code with GPL’d code. Isn’t that a violation of the GPL?

]]>