Comments on: Links 08/05/2008: New Version of Zenwalk; The GNU/Linux Effect on Windows XP http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-3/#comment-12135 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:24:31 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12135 FWIW, the statement on the Fedora FAQ means nothing other than that until such time as Red Hat’s lawyers have time to ponder over it, they aren’t going to allow it into Fedora on the grounds that there are concerns (which may or may not be accurate).

They did the same thing for Mono, and once their lawyers took a look over it, they discovered it was fine.

Another reason to avoid shipping Moonlight right now is that it is unlikely that users have demanded it (Silverlight isn’t that widespread – lets hope it stays that way).

If enough users demand Moonlight from Fedora/Red Hat – then I’m sure they’ll have their lawyers take a look at it. And /that’s/ when we’ll know for sure whether Moonlight is safe or not.

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-2/#comment-12131 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:08:21 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12131 There is FUD which is substantiated (in which case it does not quality as FUD but as valid criticism) and FUD which is not. The latter is a cheap shot, a smear.

If you can refute what you believe to be FUD, please do. I actually find it interesting that you became reader of a site which you insist is so filled with information you cannot tolerate.

Hey, didn’t you guys insist that Moonlight was ‘safe’ before the SFLC weighed in? I think we deserve an apology. :-)

]]>
By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-2/#comment-12129 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:01:38 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12129 Your own hypocrisy is the worst of all. You throw a fit about how it’s not right to throw FUD at Ubuntu while at the same time you do it all the time against Novell/Mono/GNOME.

I find that particularly hilarious.

]]>
By: Victor Soliz http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-2/#comment-12119 Mon, 09 Jun 2008 03:39:44 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12119

The hypocrisy of this site always makes for a good laugh

1) Wait for someone to report a bug.
2) Black box.
3) Now the bug is valid as reasoning for a personal attack!

I shall call it “argument from technical issue”

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-2/#comment-12074 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:21:13 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12074 More people who read this site (at least 44%) use GNU/Linux than Windows (all versions combined).

]]>
By: PitaGuy http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-2/#comment-12073 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:17:10 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12073 yeah its goona be a big problem testing on Win32..no one uses it nowadays…where in teh world are we going to finds a windowz b0x ! ROFL ! hum…maybe a few trolls in this place can test it..they are die hard window users…where are the trolls when u neeeed them…geeezz

]]>
By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12072 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:08:00 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12072 Good catch. It was derived from an existing template (see footer). If removed, I can’t test the effect on Win32 (short of browsershots,org, which would be cumbersome).

]]>
By: Dan O'Brian http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12071 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:43:49 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12071 The hypocrisy of this site always makes for a good laugh ;)

]]>
By: PitaGuy http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12070 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:36:16 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12070 “Trebuchet MS”

:D

]]>
By: PitaGuy http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12069 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:35:49 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12069 http://boycottnovell.com/nicetitles/nicetitle.css

font: bold 13px “Trebuchet MS”, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;

just bitching…

]]>
By: HumHo http://techrights.org/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/comment-page-1/#comment-12054 Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:38:51 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/2008/06/08/version-of-zenwalk/#comment-12054 Winblow is dying a sloooww and painnnfulll death

]]>