Comments on: OOXML a Descent Into Dark Ages in Today’s Age of Collaboration http://techrights.org/2011/01/21/novell-influence-in-libreoffice/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Dr. Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2011/01/21/novell-influence-in-libreoffice/comment-page-1/#comment-109047 Sat, 22 Jan 2011 05:39:39 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=44738#comment-109047 It would be best to manage everything locally.

]]>
By: twitter http://techrights.org/2011/01/21/novell-influence-in-libreoffice/comment-page-1/#comment-109039 Sat, 22 Jan 2011 01:39:42 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=44738#comment-109039 The two things are equivalent if all the work you care about is done by others in some toxic cloud. Digital restrictions all have the same goal, control and exploitation of users. Nasty file formats and cloud computing are two sides of the same coin. Free formats, P2P and user owned wikis are a different situation where file formats and other data exposure can be used to build trust and collaborative sharing. Software and network freedom are intertwined as are the mechanisms to strip users of both.

People can not share things with me through Facebook, for example, because Facebook is an exclusive publication and Facebook promotes OOXML. Owners of malicious “clouds” require non free software to enforce the limits they would set on their users, hence their promotion of garbage like Vista (via OOXML) and iPhone and vice versa. The use of Facebook accounts as a login by big publishers is like a spreading cancer. OOXML, if popularly adopted outside of the end of network freedom, would set the world back about fifteen years in terms of software freedom and document exchange. Thankfully, this is not happening. Clouds that lock everything up would truly put the world back into the dark ages where documents and information really has chains and total submission is the price of viewing. Big publishers would push us back to a world worse than broadcast and paper print and they are doing so with a variety of “services” that should be rejected. Kindle is another good example.

Sites like Wikipedia are philosophical and technical opposites to “the cloud”.

]]>
By: Dr. Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2011/01/21/novell-influence-in-libreoffice/comment-page-1/#comment-109013 Fri, 21 Jan 2011 19:46:24 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=44738#comment-109013 The point I was making about formats was referring to exchange between users rather than migration between applications on the server, which often expose all their source code (wikis for example).

]]>
By: twitter http://techrights.org/2011/01/21/novell-influence-in-libreoffice/comment-page-1/#comment-109005 Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:39:10 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=44738#comment-109005 A rethink is in order but the formats are still important. As even Ars Technia noticed in 2009, desktop PCs are “the new typewriter” and that kind of document flow is obsolete. Wikis and other services are going to take over and already have in many places. These can as easily be run by IT departments using free software as they can be farmed out. The formats used for exchanging the information are still important because it is important for people to be able to work on these things on their own and to have control of where things go. Individual access and control of work will always be required at companies that don’t want to operate the way the former Soviet Union did. Non free software in general is something that should be rejected by people and companies that value their freedom and efficient operation.

]]>