Comments on: Readers’ Response to Microsoft and American Library Association (ALA), Job Cremation http://techrights.org/2009/12/22/ala-and-msft/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: williami http://techrights.org/2009/12/22/ala-and-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-77028 Wed, 23 Dec 2009 04:36:26 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/?p=24219#comment-77028 Acuauly, I got misleaded. The source that I got it from was a settlement about Google books, and “anti-user” means that they are arguing Google’s system is propertary, not that the foundatation is “anti-user”. I blame ALA for poor documation.

Intrepidly, according to the ALA, Micro$oft is arguing that Google’s system is “anti competive”. That’s just a BLATANT LIE, as M$ is very anti completive by nature. Yet another fail’d M$ stunt aganst Google.

]]> By: Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2009/12/22/ala-and-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-77017 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:43:18 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/?p=24219#comment-77017 That’s useful to know.

I’m sure that Gates loves ALA.

]]> By: williami http://techrights.org/2009/12/22/ala-and-msft/comment-page-1/#comment-77014 Tue, 22 Dec 2009 22:17:18 +0000 http://boycottnovell.com/?p=24219#comment-77014 And that reminds me of the time the ALA dissmissed the FSF as an “anti-user” (in their words) foundation. ALA is lying, the FSF is not “anti-user”.

]]>