Comments on: Why Apple and Microsoft Operating Systems Are Unethical: New Examples http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/proprietary-software-is-unethical/ Free Software Sentry – watching and reporting maneuvers of those threatened by software freedom Fri, 25 Nov 2016 09:41:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.14 By: Dr. Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/proprietary-software-is-unethical/comment-page-1/#comment-89851 Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:16:16 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=30355#comment-89851 @Jose_X:

Yes, Apple has already threatened both Android and WebOS (Pre) with patents. We’ve begun taking Apple’s threat more seriously. I’m disappointed to see other “Linux” sites defending Apple.

]]>
By: Jose_X http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/proprietary-software-is-unethical/comment-page-1/#comment-89844 Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:44:33 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=30355#comment-89844 I forgot to mention the “obvious”. Apple may very well have patent leverage in their new devices (Jobs said they have patented everything imaginable).

For example, with dotnet applications, significant leverage lies in Microsoft’s corner. Apple would be forced to lose significant leverage if they had to go against a company with so many patents that would apply.

And, of course, Apple *is* playing the patent card to help themselves gain competitive points over rivals (injunctions or at least royalties). Not only can they lose if they have to yield significant money per device to an inferior competitor (and it’s always more profitable to gain instead), but having injunctions against what may end up being popular apps would really hurt their platform.

…and they want to have as much control as possible over the topmost layers of API being used to code the apps. Eventually, they will add enough layers. Eventually, they will want to leverage the iphone and other devices to help make the Mac platform the largest and seize control of the monopoly driver’s seat from Microsoft.

…and they fear Google. Any advantages they can preserve (eg, with patenting), they will take.

]]>
By: Dr. Roy Schestowitz http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/proprietary-software-is-unethical/comment-page-1/#comment-89843 Wed, 21 Apr 2010 14:40:15 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=30355#comment-89843 Apple’s main market is rich people (as users) and “good enough” developers. To Apple this is very profitable, even if it excludes so many.

]]>
By: Jose_X http://techrights.org/2010/04/21/proprietary-software-is-unethical/comment-page-1/#comment-89842 Wed, 21 Apr 2010 12:22:18 +0000 http://techrights.org/?p=30355#comment-89842 Perhaps Apple wants to instill a discipline that will allow its platform to function better over time than those of rivals. You can always fix bugs (not to mention that C will attract developers that tend to be more meticulous with their code), but if you code in ways where you always pressure the platform to do a lot of clean-up work for you, then you will generally not be able to create highly efficient applications no matter how much you try.

Also, I think they might be trying to fight dotnet, java, etc growth which would otherwise help some of their rivals.

Apple can get away with this because their platform is not intended to appeal to millions of in-house developers (at least not at this point in time). They can focus on a smaller group with a greater level of experience and understanding.

]]>