At the middle of last week we mentioned a Novell branch which was closing down. It now turns out that it is only one among several.
Novell is closing down its direct sales offices in Israel, Belgium, Luxembourg, Norway and Turkey
Permalink
Comments off 
Send this to a friend
“Assimilate to Novell SUSE, but die anyway”
The previous post showed that Novell is beginning to reveal more signs of vanity. It sees itself as Microsoft’s “chosen one”. This is the beginning of something rather bad, so here is a short explanation of the dangers.
If Novell was ever to succeed in the Linux business (a goal which it certainly strives to achieve), Microsoft would be on its side, but Microsoft’s intention is to eliminate all Linux companies that do not ‘surrender’ to Microsoft. Then, having centralised all Linux threats inside a single company (or few submissive companies), Microsoft can ‘kill’ Linux as though it was a corporate entity. Watch what Microsoft did to Linspire.
”Microsoft is hoping to assemble all Linux users (currently spread across 500+ Linux distributions) in a single ‘box’ and then eliminate them.“Remember that Steve Ballmer characterised Linux as a bizarre competitor because there is no company behind it and therefore it’s hard to eliminate. Yes, Steve Ballmer said something along those lines a year or two ago. By throwing all eggs in the single basket which is Novell (e.g. Mono, ‘interoperability’, and Moonlight), Microsoft is hoping to assemble all Linux users (currently spread across 500+ Linux distributions) in a single ‘box’ and then eliminate them. To use a sensitive analogy, Novell is the concentration camp of GNU/Linux. Godwin’s law hopefully does not apply here.
Moonlight and Mono are interesting components because Moonlight will be required for Linux users to access some Web sites. These users have to go through Novell first. Novell has been quiet about this gotcha phrase until we pressured them to spill these beans.
Microsoft hopes to kill and suppress all Linux that is not Novell. Until then, Novell will brag about its gifts from Microsoft and hope that all money will flow its way. That’s where Novell's selfishness and arrogance becomes the worst threat to Linux. As for Novell’s Linux, under Microsoft control (tax, patents, etc.), it will be an easy target to eliminate. Microsoft has a plan. Novell has greed. But Novell has no future.
Permalink
Comments off Send this to a friend
The Microsoft of Linux?
Novell seems to be getting back to its roots of arrogance. To quote Phil Morettini, “Novell had plenty of excuses to be arrogant, even without Microsoft’s attention. They were truly dominating the Network Operating System business. The brand was dominant, the product was good, and the worldwide distribution network of VARs and distributors was second to none. Sales people at Novell no longer had to sell–they took orders.“
What vanity is it we’re talking about? Ron Hovsepian and Justin Steinman, for example, feel like they are better than Red Hat even though they are well behind. Novell has recently joined hands and tightened its relationship with a company that is known for brutality and vanity, so this is hardly surprising. These two examples (among more), and particularly the new one from Ron Hovsepian can be nicely weaved in with some recent news. Newsweek has a new article where Google speaks about cultural issues at Microsoft.
“Google is so different that it was almost impossible to reprogram them into this culture,” says CEO Eric Schmidt.
How about this one?
Stuart Scott, Microsoft’s former CIO, is not the only Microsoft employee unceremoniously being shown the door. Some staffers who are putting in their notice are being escorted off campus immediately. Why? Because they’ve put in their notice to join Google.
Isn’t that distrubing? Microsoft likens the Mac and GNU/Linux user communities to “cults”, but some of its own behavior (at a corporate level) may suggest that it’s merely a case of reflection.
Let’s explore Microsoft’s own vanity. We’ve assembled some good examples below.
This is something that I actually cover in my personal blog. The Gates Foundation is being used to control media outlets (through investments), which then give shape to a positive image and paint Bill Gates as a Saint. The reality is far from that. Judge Gates’ character for yourself, based on those who know him personally, as opposed to those watching what journalists say in the press. These are journlists whose fundnd source include the Gates Foundation (investor) Microsoft (advertiser/partner).
At some point in your presentation billg will say “that’s the dumbest fucking idea I’ve heard since I’ve been at Microsoft.” He looks like he means it. However, since you knew he was going to say this, you can’t really let it faze you. Moreover, you can’t afford to look fazed; remember: he’s a bully.
Here is another example.
My father, in his travels, has met Bill Gates. I don’t think I’d be creating a problem for him now (as he recently retired) by saying that he was unimpressed. Apparently Gates was rude, he was distracted, and when he sat, he rocked back and forth in his chair, an action which reminded my Dad of people with dementia.
And another from Joel Spolsky (on software).
In my BillG review meeting, the whole reporting hierarchy was there, along with their cousins, sisters, and aunts, and a person who came along from my team whose whole job during the meeting was to keep an accurate count of how many times Bill said the F word. The lower the f***-count, the better.
[...]
Four,” announced the f*** counter, and everyone said, “wow, that’s the lowest I can remember. Bill is getting mellow in his old age.” He was, you know, 36.
Later I had it explained to me. “Bill doesn’t really want to review your spec, he just wants to make sure you’ve got it under control. His standard M.O. is to ask harder and harder questions until you admit that you don’t know, and then he can yell at you for being unprepared. Nobody was really sure what happens if you answer the hardest question he can come up with because it’s never happened before.”
How about this one [PDF]?
From: johnfi; Wed Mar 14 11:18:49 1990
To: RichAab; RussW; SherryR; c-JanetC
Subject: H-P New Wave
Date: Wed Mar 14 10:56:42 1990A few issues … Got a call from Gary Perez (our OEM HP Acct Mgr) this morning. They are telling HP that they wil NOT be part of this launch and that BillG has said “fxxk HP (all divisions) if they won’t sign a Windows license.”
There are many more examples, including Gates’ request for anti-Linux patents and making ACPI not work with Linux. For now, the above examples ought to suffice.
Recall this unforgettable reaction from Microsoft’s CEO.
At that point, Mr. Ballmer picked up a chair and threw it across the room hitting a table in his office. Mr. Ballmer then said: “Fucking Eric Schmidt is a fucking pussy. I’m going to fucking bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I’m going to fucking kill Google.”
More analysis here.
When Emory University primatologist Frans de Waal read a news story that said Microsoft’s chief executive, Steve Ballmer, had hurled a chair across the room on hearing an employee was going to work for rival Google, the scientist immediately made a connection with his own research: “When I see such behavior, I think of a chimpanzee.”
It seems to be just part of a behavioural pattern.
“The word ‘intense’ was invented for Ballmer, who met with us in a green room that had a paper sign with his name taped to the door. While he was at first warm and engaging, a question about security features shifted his mood. His eyes, soft when he smiles, grew dark. The usually boisterous Ballmer became unexpectedly quiet and soon exited the room without saying goodbye. Still, he had a lot to say to SmartMoney senior writer Dyan Machan before he did.
How can one forget "Developers" and "Monkey Dance"?
This one is a classic [PDF].
From: jimall Mon Sep 9 11:09:33 1991
To: billg steveb
Cc: bradsi; jonl; mikemur; paulma
Subject winball
Date: Mon Sep 09 11:08:44 PDT 1991[...]
We need to slaughter Novell before they get stronger.
Joachim Kempin seems to be quite a violent man, as the following incident illustrates.
Microsoft OEM chief Joachim Kempin was guilty of nine charges of illegal hunting…
There are many examples of anti-Linux abuses in the OEM channel and we covered some of them before. Joachim Kempin was behind threats and illegal manipulation in the marketplace.
Redmond’s vanity can be seen in the following article which advises partners never to mention GNU/Linux or Google when visiting Microsoft.
Watch how ‘poor’ Microsoft employees complain about Google ‘daring’ to touch their overwheliming market share.
Microsoft has warned Google to steer clear of corporate search, declaring that the market is “our house”….
“Those people are not going to be allowed to take food off our plate, because that is what they are intending to do.”
Here’s some evidence of what some call ‘Mafia Culture’ [PDF]
From: bradsi Fri Oct 18 14:24:00 1991
To: dawntr; jonl; makemap; mikemur; philipg; vijayc
Cc: garygi; hankv; lewisl; peteh
Subject: Re: Excel brainstorm group
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 91 14:20:38 PDTI’d be glad to help tilt lotus into into the death spiral. I could do it friday afternoon but not saturday. I could do it pretty much any time the followung week.
Watch the following. This lady isn’t so pleased with Microsoft’s deliberate corruption of Web standards.
Besides the fact that all of the Microsoft employees I have ever encountered must have been brainwashed. I don’t know where they dig these people up.
[...]
And if they AREN’T brainwashing them, then they are just hiring incompetant, pompous dumbasses. And if either is the case, why should anyone support their company?
If Novell was ever to succeed in the Linux business, that would add to its already-morbid vanity, which is infectious. Some people at Novell would not deny admiring and loving Microsoft. They would even Mimic Windows technologies. There is a huge danger here and the remainder of this story will be described in the next post.
A misinformed article from PCWorld seems to insinuate that Microsoft may no longer be a monopoly that requires government oversight. In other words, it’s an indication that Microsoft has changed its way, which it clearly has not. It only hides its anti-competitive actions slightly more effectively. From the article:
But whether because of the antitrust suits or because of other market factors, Microsoft doesn’t seem to be using its power to muscle competitors off the desktop. The very fact that Dell is selling Linux machines at all is one example. And when I recently bought a Dell desktop for home use, it came preloaded with products from two of Microsoft’s most formidable competitors–Google’s desktop search service and Mozilla’s Firefox.
This is of course escaping all the main issues. Come to discover what Microsoft has been doing to Dell since the previous ruling (and during its probation period). Behind the scenes, Microsoft sabotaged Dell's attempts to sell GNU/Linux.
As we pointed out some weeks ago, the Department of Justice is still in Microsoft's pocket (surprise, surprise! The government is not truly honest). A couple of days ago came this article:
US Justice Department objects to states’ effort to extend Microsoft oversight to 2012
“There is no basis for the court to order a five-year extension of the final judgments,” the Justice Department said in a court filing Friday, citing a lack of evidence provided by the states that such oversight is justified.
To avoid repetition, you are urged to read our previous post on this topic and learn more about the DoJ-Microsoft link. It sheds light on the issues that misinform articles such as the one from PCWorld.
Of course Microsoft still abusing and bullying the market. Need one go further than the Mandriva story that was mentioned yesterday? Even the Managing Editor of LinuxToday called it bribery.
So, even as Microsoft claims superior quality over Linux, they act as if they don’t even buy their own FUD. If they really believed that Windows was superior to Linux, they wouldn’t have to bribe people with “marketing help” to get them to choose Windows.
Speaking of Microsoft ‘bribery’, you’ll find more examples in the following recent stories:
These are just 4 among many more examples.
The government (and DoJ especially) chooses to turn a blind eye to some real issues. It wasn’t long ago that the following story, which involves the FTC, grabbed a lot of attention.
Microsoft trying to derail Google/DoubleClick deal by lobbying congress
Microsoft has hired lobbying firm Patton Boggs LLC to do work on “competitive issues surrounding Google/DoubleClick [sic] merger.”
That is monopoly abuse. Plain and simple. Microsoft was willing to pay twice as much for DoubleClick, but apparently the company’s stakeholders rejected Microsoft (they leaned from history). It is just one among a very long series of articles about Microsoft’s lobbying in American and Europe. This time, Google is the victim, not GNU/Linux. If we go a little further back, then we also find this:
Gates blackmailed Danish government
Microsoft boss Bill Gates threatened to kill 800 Danish jobs if Denmark opposed the European Computer Implemented Inventions Directive, reports today’s Danish financial daily Børsen, quoted by NoSoftwarePatents.com.
That fits nicely with our coverage on software patents and the lobbying (manipulation and sometimes bullying, bribery, extortion, and blackmail) that is used to change the law in Europe.
Not much was said specifically about the PCWorld article, but don’t the stories above answer its headline? Judge for yourselves…
Eight Years Later, Is Microsoft Still a[n abusive] Monopoly?
Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Guest Editorial Team
Community: Get involved
RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates
Site Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content
Site Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page
IRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time
Design by Beccary and Weblogs.us · Valid XHTML · Valid CSS · Hosting by Schestowitz · Part of Bytes Media
 | |
Content is available under CC-BY-SA
Editors • About the Site • Comes vs. Microsoft • Using This Web Site • Site Archives • Credibility Index • OOXML • OpenDocument • Patents • Novell • News Digest • Site News • RSS