Gemini version available ♊︎

Caldera-Microsoft Exposé Begins

Posted in Antitrust, Courtroom, Law, Microsoft, Novell, SCO, SUN at 6:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Yesterday we wrote about the Caldera settlement because Groklaw had obtained the details of a mysterious settlements. It now proceeds to further details and pinpoints a site that we mentioned here before. A lot of legal material is available out there, so although Microsoft tried to destroy it, it can be resurrected. Pamela seems up to the task.

The Caldera v. Microsoft Docket – All the Documents To Be Found, So Far


There is also a web site I’ve linked to before, where they have a collection of some more of the missing documents. And in the previous article I did on it, I told the rest of the story regarding the destruction of the documents by Canopy, and Sun’s intervention to save some of them. Perhaps they’ll get dragged into this mess too.

The web site is MaxFrame Corporation’s, where you can also find some materials about Digital Research, Dr. Gary Kildall, and a History of MS-DOS. Scroll down on the home page to the link for “The Full Story” and you’ll find all the documents they have. For example, here’s the Complaint, the Amended Complaint, a Caldera January 10, 2000 press release announcing that Microsoft had decided to settle, and a Joe Barr January 2000 LinuxWorld article, Details are scarce, but the settlement looks to be a humbling defeat for Microsoft.

It’s going to be very interesting to see what Microsoft desperately tried to hide, paying Novell tens of millions of dollars in the process.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.


  1. Jose_X said,

    September 8, 2008 at 7:59 am


    I remember some years back, within a few short months after the Borland lawsuit was dragged up on Yahoo news (don’t remember what the article(s) was about precisely) and discussed on Yahoo reader comments (back when Yahoo allow such comments) that the link to the Borland lawsuit went dead. I may have saved a copy, but certainly I was not able to find that webpage when I did look for it on a few occasions thereafter.

    The matter was settled out of court. The precise violations alleged involved California anti-competition laws about what a company can’t do such as attempt to deplete a competitor of its (key?) employees. Monopoly issues weren’t even involved here. The precise target was that guy (Hiej….?) that developed the core of dotnet (and/or C#), who was a star for years while at Borland, as well as many of his associates also at Borland.

  2. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 8, 2008 at 8:03 am


    You might find the following handy (some of them are recent):


  3. Jose_X said,

    September 8, 2008 at 8:49 am


    This isn’t the actual Borland suit, but it covers some details: http://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-229218.html The story is from 1999.

    >> Yocam claimed that in a 30-month time frame, Microsoft hired 34 of the ailing software developer’s key employees with huge signing bonuses, some in excess of $1 million. “They have the audacity to send limos to Borland’s headquarters to take Borland employees out to lunch,” he said at the time.
    >> While the suit was later settled, the damage had been done….

    I just found this http://www.secinfo.com/drdbh.81th.htm

    >> On May 7, 1997, the Company filed a lawsuit against Microsoft Corporation
    (“Microsoft”) in the California Superior Court in Santa Clara County. The
    lawsuit charges Microsoft with unfair competition in violation of California
    law. The lawsuit focuses on the recruiting and hiring of Borland employees by
    Microsoft with the alleged purpose of damaging Borland’s ability to compete with
    Microsoft and seeks unspecified monetary damages and an injunction against
    Microsoft’s practices.

    It may be possible that the webpage I mentioned earlier can be found somewhere (or the equivalent based on court documents), but it was interesting that at least at the time that the bad publicity hit the air (early days of dotnet/mono), that this particular page disappeared. Microsoft had invested in Borland by then, and they certainly didn’t want a bad image for this young technology, themselves, or their employees, especially since MSdotnet was being laughed at by everyone and their dog at that point in time.

    The following is also interesting though I post it not intending to portray any wrongdoing: http://www.foxprohistory.org/ashton_sues_fox.htm

    >> Microsoft’s merge with Fox Software was well timed. The two companies had been in negotiations for three years, but talks didn’t get serious until a threatening lawsuit against Fox Softwarec was lifted. The suit was filed in 1988 by Ashton-Tate, which Borland acquired in 1991. Ironically, after Borland acquired Ashton-Tate, the company dropped the suit under pressure from the Justice Department and promised not to file a similar suit for ten years, clearing the way for Microsoft’s acquisition.
    >> The day the news broke, Borland’s stock dropped by 10 percent, and the downward spiral had begun. For the next three years, Borland executives would spend all of their time and energy battling Microsoft.

    and again from http://news.cnet.com/2009-1023-229218.html
    >> In retrospect, Kahn said Microsoft’s key weapon on both the database and tools front was price. “The fundamental problem I had at Borland was that I was trying to sell what Microsoft was giving away,” Kahn told CNET News.com. “Everyone always agreed that Borland built the best technology, but how much better did the technology continue to have to be to compete with what essentially was free software?”

  4. Roy Schestowitz said,

    September 8, 2008 at 9:03 am


    Groklaw seems to have some material about this.

    None is mentioned in the headline though, so I assume there’s no cohesive analysis. Court documents would be handy.

DecorWhat Else is New

  1. Links 19/10/2021: Karanbir Singh Leaves CentOS Board, GPL Violations at Vizio

    Links for the day

  2. [Meme] Giving the Knee

    The 'knee' champion Kratochvìl and 'kneel' champion Erlingsdóttir are simply crushing the law; they’re ignoring the trouble of EPO staff and abuses of the Office, facilitated by the Council itself (i.e. facilitated by themselves)

  3. Josef Kratochvìl Rewarded Again for Covering Up EPO Corruption and the EPO Bribes the Press for Lies Whilst Also Lying About Its Colossal Privacy Violations

    Corrupt officials and officials who actively enable the crimes still control the Office and also the body which was supposed to oversee it; it's pretty evident and clear judging by this week's press statements at the EPO's official Web site

  4. [Meme] Sorry, Wrong Country (Or: Slovenia isn't Great Britain)

    Team UPC is trying to go ahead with a total hoax which a high-level European court would certainly put an end to (if or when a referral is initiated)

  5. How Denmark, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Sweden Voted on Patently Unlawful Regulations at the EPO

    We look back and examine what happened 8 years ago when oppressed staff was subjected to unlawful new “regulations” (long enjoyed by António Campinos, the current EPO autocrat)

  6. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVII: The Non-Monolithic Nordic Bloc

    We start our investigation of how countries in northern Europe ended up voting on the unlawful “Strike Regulations” at the EPO and why

  7. Proof That Windows “11” is a Hoax

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission

  8. Firefox Becomes as Morally Reprehensible as Apple, Facebook, or Uber

    Guest post by Ryan, reprinted with permission

  9. Links 19/10/2021: GNU dbm 1.22 and Godot 3.4 RC 1

    Links for the day

  10. [Meme] [Teaser] GitHub an Expensive and Dangerous Trap (Also: Misogyny Hub)

    The ongoing Microsoft GitHub exposé will give people compelling reasons to avoid GitHub, which is basically just a subsidised (at a loss) trap

  11. Norway Should Have Voted Against Benoît Battistelli's Illegal (Anti-)'Strike Regulations' at the European Patent Office

    Benoît Battistelli‘s EPO faced no real and potent opposition from Norwegian delegates, who chose to abstain from the vote on the notorious and illegal so-called ‘Strike Regulations’ (they’re just an attack on strikes, an assault on basic rights of labourers)

  12. Links 19/10/2021: Sequoia PGP LGPL 2.0+, Open RAN Adoption

    Links for the day

  13. [Meme] [Teaser] Benoît Battistelli, King of Iceland

    Later today we shall see how the current deputy of the head of the EPO‘s overseeing body was in fact likely rewarded for her complicity in Benoît Battistelli‘s abuses against EPO staff, including staff from Iceland

  14. IRC Proceedings: Monday, October 18, 2021

    IRC logs for Monday, October 18, 2021

  15. Links 19/10/2021: MyGNUHealth 1.0.5 and Ubuntu 22.04 Now Developed

    Links for the day

  16. [Meme] [Teaser] Thrown Under the Bus

    Tomorrow we shall look at Danish enablers of unlawful EPO regulations, Jesper Kongstad and Anne Rejnhold Jørgensen

  17. The World Needs to Know What Many Austrians Already Know About Rude Liar, the Notorious 'Double-Dipper'

    Today we publish many translations (from German) about the Austrian double-dipper, who already became the subject of unfavourable press coverage in his home country; he’s partly responsible for crushing fundamental rights at the EPO under Benoît Battistelli‘s regime

  18. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XVI: The Demise of the Austrian Double-Dipper

    Friedrich ‘Rude Liar’ Rödler is notorious in the eyes of EPO staff, whom he was slandering and scandalising for ages while he himself was the real scandal

  19. Links 18/10/2021: Porteus Kiosk 5.3 and Ventoy 1.0.55

    Links for the day

  20. [Meme] [Teaser] More to Life Than Patents

    Greedy sociopaths oughtn’t be put in charge of patent offices; this is what’s dooming the EPO in recent years (all they think about is money

  21. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part II — The Campaign Against GPL Compliance and War on Copyleft Enforcement

    Microsoft contemplated buying GitHub 7.5 years ago; the goal wasn’t to actually support “Open Source” but to crush it from the inside and that’s what Microsoft has been doing over the past 2.5 years (we have some details from the inside)

  22. Links 18/10/2021: Linux 5.15 RC6 and 7 New Stable Kernels

    Links for the day

  23. [Meme] The Austrian School of Friedrich Rude Liar

    With reference to the Austrian School, let’s consider the fact that Friedrich Rude Liar might in fact be standing to personally gain by plundering the EPO‘s staff by demonising them while helping Benoît Battistelli crush them

  24. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, October 17, 2021

    IRC logs for Sunday, October 17, 2021

  25. How (Simple Technical Steps) to Convince Yourself That DuckDuckGo is Just Spyware Connected to Microsoft, Falsely Advertised as 'Privacy'

    In recent days we published or republished some bits and pieces about what DuckDuckGo really is; the above reader dropped by to enlighten us and demonstrate just how easy it is to see what DuckDuckGo does even at the client side (with JavaScript); more people need to confront DuckDuckGo over this and warn colleagues/friends/family (there’s more here)

  26. Austria's Right-Wing Politicians Displaying Their Arrogance to EPO Examiners

    The EPO‘s current regime seems to be serving a money-hungry lobby of corrupt officials and pathological liars; tonight we focus on Austria

  27. [Meme] Friedrich Rödler's Increasingly Incomprehensible Debt Quagmire, Years Before EPO Money Was Trafficked Into the Stock Market

    As it turns out, numerous members of the Administrative Council of the EPO are abundantly corrupt and greedy; They falsely claim or selfishly pretend there’s a financial crisis and then moan about a "gap" that does not exist (unless one counts the illegal gambling, notably EPOTIF, which they approved), in turn recruiting or resorting to scabs that help improve ‘profit margins’

  28. The EPO’s Overseer/Overseen Collusion — Part XV: Et Tu Felix Austria…

    Prior to the Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos regime the EPO‘s hard-working staff was slandered by a corrupt Austrian official, Mr. Rödler

  29. Links 17/10/2021: Blender 2.93.5, Microsoft Bailouts

    Links for the day

  30. Links 17/10/2021: GhostBSD 21.10.16 and Mattermost 6.0

    Links for the day

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts