05.11.09

Gemini version available ♊︎

Reader’s Article: The Microsoft Patent Threat to ODF

Posted in Free/Libre Software, FUD, GNU/Linux, GPL, Microsoft, Office Suites, Open XML, OpenDocument, Patents at 4:06 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

by Paul E. Merrell, J.D. (Marbux)

Coming on the heels of its April 28, 2009 release of Microsoft Office 2007 Service Pack 2 (“SP 2″), Microsoft has added several versions of the OpenDocument Format standard (“ODF”)to its list of specifications covered by the Microsoft Open Specification Promise (“MOSP”). The expected move casts the pall of the Microsoft software patent cloud over ODF, which is supported by many free and open source software (“FOSS”) computer programs.

SP 2 adds native ODF read/write support to Microsoft Office 2007 and is slated to become an automatically installed update to Office 2007 in approximately 75 days.

“The MOSP was criticized on several grounds including transferal of insufficient patent rights to implement OOXML, extreme ambiguity, and provisions incompatible with the Gnu General Public License.”The MOSP achieved notoriety during the processing of Microsoft Office Open XML into ISO/IEC:29500-2008 Office Open XML (“OOXML”). The MOSP was criticized on several grounds including transferal of insufficient patent rights to implement OOXML, extreme ambiguity, and provisions incompatible with the Gnu General Public License. Major critiques were published by Groklaw, the Software Freedom Law Center, and the University of New South Wales Faculty of Law.

Although the points raised by the Groklaw critique — also addressed in the later University of New South Wales critique — were published in January of 2007, Microsoft has apparently never responded to any of the specific criticisms. (Disclosure: although unattributed, this writer researched and drafted the portions of the Groklaw document criticizing the MOSP.)

Microsoft lawyer Steve Mutkoski, who co-authored the MOSP, was interviewed by ZDNet Asia in regard to the University of New South Wales critique but did not address any specific criticism included in the University publication.

One question raised by the Microsoft extension of the MOSP to ODF is whether Microsoft actually controls any patents whose claims read on implementation of ODF. As with Microsoft’s claim of patent infringement by the Gnu/Linux operating system, Microsoft has not identified any specific patents that implementation of ODF might infringe.

According to a 2007 Fortune magazine interview with Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith and licensing chief Horacio Gutierrez regarding Microsoft claims that Gnu/Linux infringes, Microsoft “refuses to identify specific patents or explain how they’re being infringed, lest FOSS advocates start filing challenges to them.”

But [Gutierrez] does break down the total number allegedly violated – 235 – into categories. He says that the Linux kernel – the deepest layer of the free operating system, which interacts most directly with the computer hardware – violates 42 Microsoft patents. The Linux graphical user interfaces – essentially, the way design elements like menus and toolbars are set up – run afoul of another 65, he claims. The Open Office suite of programs, which is analogous to Microsoft Office, infringes 45 more. E-mail programs infringe 15, while other assorted FOSS programs allegedly transgress 68.

While Microsoft has not identified any specific patents whose claims read on ODF implementation, the Microsoft claim that the OpenOffice.org (“OOo”) office suite infringes 42 Microsoft patents raises reasonable grounds to suspect that some of the same patents — if they in fact exist — may read on implementation of ODF, since OOo is presently the market-leading implementation of ODF.

However, a follow-on article published by RedmondDeveloper attributes to Microsoft a statement that OOo infringes on 45 patents rather than 42, which leaves the precise number of patents claimed to be infringed by OOo ambiguous.

It is equally reasonable to suspect that Microsoft lawyers’ concerns that FOSS advocates might challenge the patent’s validity has only increased since the 2007 Fortune interview. Since then, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has severely undermined (PDF) its precedents approving of software as patentable subject matter but has reserved a ruling on the specific issue for a later case in which a software patent is at issue:

We leave to future cases the elaboration of the precise contours of machine implementation, as well as the answers to particular questions, such as whether or when recitation of a computer suffices to tie a process claim to a particular machine.

That case was preceded by indications that U.S. Supreme Court justices doubted whether software is patentable subject matter, an issue on which that court has never ruled.

Microsoft’s list of specifications covered now includes the following ODF standards:

  • OpenDocument Format for Office Applications v1.0 OASIS
  • OpenDocument Format for Office Applications v1.0
  • ISO/IEC 26300:2006
  • OpenDocument Format for Office Applications v1.1 OASIS

Microsoft also added language to the MOSP specific to those standards and to Ecma 376, the predecessor of OOXML:

As long as Microsoft participates in their revision process to completion, Microsoft irrevocably commits to apply this promise to future versions of the below listed specifications.

That language resolves one criticism of the MOSP but leaves all others unrepaired, leaving the MOSP still hopelessly ambiguous. Microsoft also added its own Implementer’s Notes for ODF 1.1 to the list of covered specifications, with a new definition of “Microsoft Necessary Claims” specific to those implementation notes and those for ECMA 376, which served as the draft for ISO/IEC:29500 OOXML:

With respect to these Implementer’s Notes, the definition of “Microsoft Necessary Claims shall be – those claims of Microsoft-owned or Microsoft-controlled patents that are necessary to implement the information contained within the Implementer’s Notes when read in conjunction with the Covered Specification to which the Implementer’s Notes applies to the extent the information is described in detail and not merely referenced in such Implementer’s Notes”.

In this writer’s opinion, the injection of a definition for the Implementer’s Notes different from that applied to ODF itself does nothing more than increase the ambiguity of both definitions in combination. However, with both, the problem remains that patents are not “necessary to implement” a specification.

“As a practical matter, Microsoft’s extension of the MOSP to ODF is in my considered opinion unlikely to have anything beyond propaganda value to Microsoft, the ability to extend its infringement claims to ODF implementations other than OOo.”Software is written in code, not in patent claims, and a specification can be implemented regardless of whether a patent would thereby be infringed. “[P]atents that are necessary to implement” a specification is a null set and no rights are thereby conveyed. It remains worrisome that Microsoft continues to foregop usage of widely-adopted and well understood language for the conveyance of patent rights such as “patent claims that are necessarily infringed by implementation” of a specification.

Rather than repeating what has previously been written, the reader is referred to the other critiques of the MOSP linked above as to other and equally troubling issues embodied in the MOSP.

As a practical matter, Microsoft’s extension of the MOSP to ODF is in my considered opinion unlikely to have anything beyond propaganda value to Microsoft, the ability to extend its infringement claims to ODF implementations other than OOo.

Never-withdrawn and expansive Microsoft public statements about the extent of the rights conveyed by the MOSP when it was first issued remain at odds with what the MOSP actually says. Those statements were beyond question intended to induce reliance on the statements, and an estoppel or waiver of any contrary rights would likely be found by a court reviewing the issues.

Likewise, Microsoft’s failure to take any legal action to assert the rights it claims are being infringed in more than two years plus its refusal to identify the specific patents involved raises the affirmative defense of laches, that Microsoft slept on its rights too long.

Because of those factors, the movement by courts toward curtailing or eliminating the patentability of software, and the likelihood that any assertion of relevant Microsoft patent rights would trigger patent Armageddon as other ODF implementers’ patent portfolios are fired in retaliation, it appears likely that the patent stand-off between FOSS advocates and Microsoft will continue, with every day of delay in pursuit of its claimed legal rights strengthening the argument that Microsoft slept too long on its rights.

Still, Microsoft’s continued claims of patent infringement by FOSS developers and its refusal to alter the MOSP to make it compatible with any other licensing scheme — from FOSS to proprietary in nature — stand as concrete barriers between Microsoft and other software developers, barriers that can only be removed by a good faith Microsoft effort to create a patent rights structure that other developers can work within.

A patent promise that threatens to jerk the legal legs out from under any who dare to implement the covered specifications is an unstable foundation both for any software development effort and for those reformers within Microsoft seeking to improve working relations with FOSS developers.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

A Single Comment

  1. The Mad Hatter said,

    May 11, 2009 at 10:01 am

    Gravatar

    Microsoft? Good Faith?

    Yeah, right.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Microsoft GitHub Exposé — Part XXI — Rumours About How Microsoft Plans to Actually Make Money (Not Losses) From GitHub

    GitHub is not 'free hosting' but a ticking time bomb, a proprietary platform looking to entrap its users (serfs) inside yet more proprietary platforms (for Microsoft to become their oppressive master)



  2. Links 28/05/2022: KDE Weekly Summary, RZBoard V2L

    Links for the day



  3. [Meme] Fluffy Staff

    EPO President António Campinos is failing to ‘contain’ the media after less than 4 years at the Office, just like Benoît Battistelli around 2014



  4. Kluwer Patent Blog Belatedly Gives EPO Staff a Voice

    There are at least 2 bloggers — if not 3 people — at Kluwer Patent Blog who air grievances of EPO staff; in addition, many of the comments there blast EPO management and Team UPC and it helps change the perceptions long shaped by bribes and blackmail from EPO management



  5. [Meme] Fluffy President

    Prepare for more puff pieces and fluff from President Fluffinos, who has commandeered the EPO‘s official Web site for self-serving whitewash and promotion of illegal agenda like European software patents and a kangaroo court to approve those (UPC)



  6. Blaming Patent Examiners Who Respect the Law

    The latest comments here are quite revealing; the EPO not only breaks the law with impunity but it also challenges the very legal system (like courts) with total impunity; Benoît Battistelli and António Campinos are, in that regard, no better than Putin, just more temperamental



  7. Our Priorities and Our Future: More Gemini and More Daily Links (a Lot More Frequently)

    An informal and unscripted video that explains where we are and where we’re going



  8. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 27, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 27, 2022



  9. Links 28/05/2022: Twitter Fined for Spying in '2FA' Clothing

    Links for the day



  10. Links 27/05/2022: Trisquel 10.0.1 LTS and Perl Appreciation

    Links for the day



  11. Links 27/05/2022: Fwupd 1.8.1 and GCC 9.5

    Links for the day



  12. Visual Proof That Twitter Very Likely Faked Its Magnitude the Moment Musk et al (KSA, Ellison and so on) Wanted to Buy

    There's a very compelling case for the allegation that Twitter is defrauding shareholders and participants in the platform; Twitter is a lot smaller than it used to be (fewer people are actively involved), it is losing money, and it is so desperate to be acquired that it's shamelessly faking traffic



  13. Links 27/05/2022: Wayland 1.21 Alpha, KDE Adds Flatpak and Snap Permissions to Discover

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 26, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 26, 2022



  15. Links 27/05/2022: Many More Microsoft Security Failures (and Spin/Lies)

    Links for the day



  16. Links 26/05/2022: KStars 3.5.9 and Chrome 103 Beta

    Links for the day



  17. Links 26/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 9.0, MooseX::Extended for Perl Introduced

    Links for the day



  18. Links 26/05/2022: Kernel Events and Systemd-Free GNU/Linux Distributions

    Links for the day



  19. Links 26/05/2022: DuckDuckGo Increasingly Exposed as Microsoft Proxy

    Links for the day



  20. EPO Celebrates Software Patents Again, Dubbing Them 'Hey Hi' (AI) and '4IR'

    The ludicrous state of the EPO is demonstrated by yesterday’s puff piece about “four million” (merely requests for monopoly in Europe; most come from outside Europe) and L’Oréal, which claims to have “invented” something that was already done in the 1990s if not the 1980s



  21. [Meme] EPO's Monkey Business: Lowering the Patent Examination Bar

    As we shall show in a moment, EPO President António Campinos has lowered the quality of patents and applications; sooner or later he might outsource the job to ‘livestock’



  22. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, May 25, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, May 25, 2022



  23. Heads of Patent Offices Are Immune to Coronavirus

    The overconfident chiefs of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and EPO might love speaking about COVID-19 (in relation to patents), but they do not take it seriously themselves



  24. Links 26/05/2022: Plex Finally on GNU/Linux

    Links for the day



  25. The General Consultative Committee of the EPO Exposes a Disaster and a Lack of Genuine Dialogue

    The General Consultative Committee (GCC) at the EPO deals with unlawful proposals from António Campinos (he’s happy to violate laws, constitutions, protocols, conventions, just like Benoît Battistelli did) and once again the abuses by managers is covered up; it’s as if the Office is run by unaccountable gangsters who arrogantly curse at everyone whilst insisting they’re the nicest people ever



  26. The Latest Letter to Josef Kratochvìl and the Heads of Delegation of the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation

    A week-old letter from the Central Staff Committee (CSC) to the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation highlights the nature of a crisis; there's no genuine dialogue and staff of the EPO (i.e. the scientists who do all the actual work) is constantly under attack



  27. [Meme] The Recordings Must Have Accidentally Been Lost While Breaking the Rules

    The EPO‘s “nicest” chief, Monopoly Tony, won’t even mention the recordings…



  28. Links 25/05/2022: ‘V Rising’ on GNU/Linux and Pearl Linux OS 11

    Links for the day



  29. Links 25/05/2022: Librem Tries Another Approach

    Links for the day



  30. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 24, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 24, 2022


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts