11.08.15

Gemini version available ♊︎

The EPO’s Investigative Unit Exposed: Part VI

Posted in Europe, Patents at 9:32 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Investigating the investigators

Sebastian Bauer in an EPO protest
Sebastian Bauer watches those brave people who ‘dare’ to exercise their right to protest; other people’s faces are pixellated so as to obscure and thus better protect their identity

Summary: Research into the harsh methods used by the infamous Investigative Unit (I.U.) of the EPO and its Chief Investigator (shown above)

IN previous parts of this multi-part investigation, namely [1, 2, 3, 4, 5], we rather politely talked about the people who turned the EPO into the gestEPO. "Gestapo" is what some people call the Investigative Unit internally, equating it with Geheime Staatspolizei, or the Secret State Police. “The Investigative Unit of the European Patent Office,” one source told us, “was created by Mr Battistelli in 2012. Officially, this unit was designed to protect the organisation from fraud and corruption. It was also presented as a “service to EPO colleagues” in order to protect the weak against the strong. However, when the I.U. reported that all allegations of corruption against Željko Topić were unfounded it became clear that this unit was just a political police in the hands of Mr Battistelli.” It should be noted that Željko Topić lost his case, so the allegations are quite likely true, at least on the balance of probabilities, and more criminal charges remain. In light of this, Topić seemed to be an apt addition to the gestEPO. Today we continue providing some background information about various individual members of the Investigative Unit. We focus on high-level people and we strongly adhere to the principle that we should only use information which is already publicly accessible. It’s not an attack on people’s privacy but a criticism of their track record at the EPO, where many overly stressed people commit suicide.

“It’s not an attack on people’s privacy but a criticism of their track record at the EPO, where many overly stressed people commit suicide.”This article focuses on Sebastian Bauer, who is the Chief Investigator at the I.U.

“One of the key players in Zanghi’s team,” told us a source, “is a “gentleman” by the name of Sebastian Bauer who is noted for his sartorial elegance.

“It is not clear where exactly he acquired his taste for expensive suits but this may have been during his post-graduate studies at Cambridge where he acquired an LL.M master’s degree in International Law.”

His full resumé can be found on LinkedIn (don’t click if/whilst logged in, as that may accidentally reveal one’s identity to him; here is a local copy [PDF]).

As the resumé makes quite evident, Mr. Bauer started off his career as a humble trainee law clerk in the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Munich in 2004, but it soon became clear that he was destined for greater things.

By 2009 he was working as an “Ethics Officer” for the World Bank in Washington, according to his profile on XING that says “Employee in Washington, D.C.”

“It is not clear where exactly he acquired his taste for expensive suits but this may have been during his post-graduate studies at Cambridge where he acquired an LL.M master’s degree in International Law.”
      –Anonymous source
We wish to kindly remind (or inform) readers of a long history of World Bank whistleblowers, some better known than others (whistleblower.org has a partial list).

By 2011, Mr. Bauer had advanced to the role of “Investigator” at the World Bank where his duties included “Investigation of staff misconduct”, “Resolution of workplace grievances” and “Outreach and communication to staff members on internal grievance procedures”.

He joined the EPO in March 2012, where he was initially attached to the Legal Services Department. It is rumoured, based on our sources, that he played a key role in drafting the “Guidelines for Investigations”, the notorious “Circular No. 342″ which we covered in parts I and II.

After the entry into force of “Circular No. 342″, Bauer joined the newly-formed Investigative Unit in January 2013. In the mean time he had made quite a name for himself with his reputedly aggressive interrogation techniques which are said to include the skillful application of the “Reid Technique”.

“It is rumoured, based on our sources, that he played a key role in drafting the “Guidelines for Investigations”, the notorious “Circular No. 342″ which we covered in parts I and II.”Wikipedia defines it as “a method of questioning subjects to try to assess their credibility through a non-accusatory interview process, and then if the investigative information indicates the subject’s probable involvement in the commission of the crime, an accusatory interrogation is initiated to develop the truth. Supporters argue the Reid technique is useful in extracting information from otherwise unwilling suspects, while critics have charged the technique can elicit false confessions from innocent persons, especially children. Reid’s breakthrough case resulted in an overturned conviction decades later.”

This seems to be similar to the method used on Quinn Norton to overzealously manufacture a case against Aaron Swartz, who later committed suicide. Watch the interview with a weeping Norton in the film “The Internet’s Own Boy: The Story of Aaron Swartz” (free to watch), a timely film by Brian Knappenberger because yesterday was Aaron Swartz Day. Mr. Bauer should be made aware of the dire consequence of the Reid technique.

“Mr. Bauer is also regularly spotted as an “observer” at EPO Staff demonstrations.”
      –Anonymous source
“When dealing with ordinary staff members,” told us another source, “the I.U. becomes an accusation unit. Their goal is to put the head of the accused on a silver plate and bring it to the President.”

Their “interrogation technique is criticized in European democratic countries because it is suspected to bring false confessions. No staff member can be prepared for such an experience. It was even reported that some attempted to commit suicide afterwards.”

Again, Mr. Bauer should be made aware of the potential consequences of continuing these practices.

“There are also many rumours in circulation,” said our source, “which suggest that he is quite adept at “constructing” allegations and misrepresenting facts to the detriment of those under investigation.

“Mr. Bauer is also regularly spotted as an “observer” at EPO Staff demonstrations.”

The photo above is a photo of a demonstration in front of the EPO’s main building in Munich, where he could be seen keeping a watchful eye on the protesters.

““Legal experts that [this source] talked to have been of the opinion that some of the actions of the Investigative Unit violate national laws and could provide a basis for criminal charges if national courts were to decide to lift immunity.””
      –Anonymous source
We asked one of the sources we trust about this situation, only to be told what we knew all along. To quote: “Legal experts that [this source] talked to have been of the opinion that some of the actions of the Investigative Unit violate national laws and could provide a basis for criminal charges if national courts were to decide to lift immunity.”

As one former EPO staff member (apparently that’s his/her background) put it last month (with slight edits): “The investigations against EPO staff and union representatives continue with the help of Control Risks, the company that allegedly spied on journalists on behalf of Deutsche Telekom in order to identify contact persons inside the company who were involved in leaking information to external parties. For sure, Control Risks people are operating within the EPO in many situations immoral and illegal. All EPO co-workers should collect evidences and facts from Control Risks activities, that possibly infringe national German and/or Dutch laws. These evidences [sic] and facts can help in eventual legal actions against Control Risks in Germany and The Netherlands.”

To date, the Investigative Unit has relied on the EPO’s immunity to protect itself from such unpleasant legal consequences.

“Some people inside the EPO’s management seem to believe that as public servants they have a right to remain invisible and never be criticised for their actions.”However, with the recent motion passed by the Dutch Parliament which called on the Dutch Government to take action to ensure that the EPO complies with international legal norms and which also called for limits to be imposed on the immunity of international organisations in cases involving breaches of national rules, the legal landscape may be slowly changing in this regard. See this new comment from the same person.

I myself have already considered (and was pressing to take) legal action against EPO individuals, for reasons that shall become apparent later this month. There is a lot more to come. Some people inside the EPO’s management seem to believe that as public servants they have a right to remain invisible and never be criticised for their actions. We don’t actually infringe the privacy of anyone; this stuff is already in the public domain. The close-up photo of Sebastian Bauer, for example (in the resumé extracted from his public profile), actually comes from a LinkedIn profile, which is publicly accessible.

What else has the I.U. been up to? How do they work? Stay tuned for the next part.

“Privacy protects us from abuses by those in power, even if we’re doing nothing wrong at the time of surveillance.”

Bruce Schneier

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. IBM's Lennart Poettering on Breaking Software for Pseudo Novelty

    Recently-uploaded ELCE 2011 clip shows a panel with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Paul McKenney, and Lennart Poettering (relevant to novelty or perceived novelty that mostly degrades the experience of longtime users, e.g. Wayland and systemd)



  2. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 15, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 15, 2022



  3. Links 15/05/2022: Linux 5.18 RC7 and Calls for More Mass Surveillance

    Links for the day



  4. Audio: Mark Shuttleworth Marketed to Young Males, With Sexy Pictures

    The Web is rotting away, old links become broken links within months or years, so I’ve decided to encode a 3-minute segment of the whole as Ogg



  5. What a Difference Half a Decade Makes (When Linux Foundation is 'Having Fun')

    Media shaming campaigns may have taken their toll on the founder of Linux, who is now bossed by someone who rejects Linux and is married to a Microsoft booster. Like Richard Stallman under FSF guidance (and conditions for return, mostly for fear of further media assaults and attack dogs), he has become a more publicity-shy and private person. The Linux Foundation has in effect reduced the founder of what it’s called after (Linux) into a weekly release manager and mascot, whose brand it is gradually diluting/cheapening.



  6. Links 15/05/2022: GNU libiconv 1.17

    Links for the day



  7. [Meme] Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) Cannot Be Reconciled With the Law

    Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC)? Impossible. But Team UPC counts on an endless torrent of fake news managing to convince you (and more importantly politicians) otherwise.



  8. Even Team Battistelli is Sometimes Admitting -- Out in Public! -- That Unified Patent Court (UPC) is Neither Legal Nor Desirable

    Daniel X. Thomas and other people who are “too old to punish” (consequences to their career profoundly minimised owing to seniority) are among those who push back against the Unitary Patent or Unified Patent Court (UPC); any sane person — not a career-climbing litigation zealot — can identify the pertinent facts and realise that what’s going on here is an injustice of unprecedented proportions in the patent discipline



  9. [Meme] Common Sense at EPO

    The European examiners who deal with patents prefer a system that works for science, for Europe, not for foreign megacorporations that amass millions of low-quality patents and weaponise these to discourage competition



  10. Patent Granting at the EPO Has Collapsed by 24% Owing to Much-Needed Industrial Action

    Seeing that the EPO’s management routinely violates the law and even the very legal basis of the EPO’s existence (it is a monopoly in Europe; no body has the authority to compete against it), the EPO’s examiners have embarked on a ‘Work-to-Rule’ campaign — working in compliance with the rules as defined 49 years ago and revised over the decades — and the European Patent Convention (EPC) takes priority over unlawful demands from middle and upper management; this is proving highly effective so far and it will carry on until demands are met, i.e. until the law is obeyed and staff is treated with respect/dignity



  11. [Meme] Milan is a Suburb in London

    As long as Italy is not the UK and London means London “proper” (not the French town called London) the UPCA is invalid and no matter how much Team UPC (and its puppets in EPO management) may plead, this whole system is bound to implode



  12. The Latest Propaganda Tactics of Team UPC: Pretending Unified Patent Court Already Exists and Unitary Patents Are Default When If Fact None Even Exists

    8 years ago Benoît Battistelli said that the UPC was imminent; now, after 4 years of António Campinos, it’s still not here and Team UPC speculators say it won’t happen this year, either; just like the EPO constantly lies (both to the public and to its very own staff) Team UPC continues to lie to itself (self-delusion) and to us; both also routinely break the law, engage in deliberate violations of longstanding conventions, and scrap constitutions, which in turn becomes a breaking point for the EU’s credibility and the legal profession



  13. Links 15/05/2022: More Azure Shutdowns and Windows Security Blunders Aplenty

    Links for the day



  14. IRC Proceedings: Saturday, May 14, 2022

    IRC logs for Saturday, May 14, 2022



  15. Links 15/05/2022: Pika Backup 0.4

    Links for the day



  16. Changes in the Site and the Capsule

    A 10-minute explanation of what we've been up to lately and what's changing; hopefully I'll have a lot more free time in months to come and we'll be able to produce about a dozen posts per day



  17. Links 14/05/2022: Alt Linux 10.0 Released

    Links for the day



  18. Links 14/05/2022: Builder GTK 4 Porting and Raspberry Pi Matrix Dashboard

    Links for the day



  19. Elon Musk is Right About Twitter Faking Its Importance and Using Doctored, Manipulated 'Stats' (or Bots) to Boost Valuation Based on Lies

    Today’s empirical proof that Twitter is totally faking its relevance and reach/influence, based on “Analytics” of my long-inactive account; the SEC will once again — quite likely as usual — let Musk get away with it, killing a company for personal gain as a temporary shareholder who amassed a ton of free publicity (he paid nothing at all and sent the company into a death spiral, pretty much in the same way Microsoft and Icahn did Yahoo! or Microsoft and Elop did Nokia)



  20. Who Brings Home the Bacon (Revenue), Sheela or James (Jim)?

    Sheela (yes, wife of the nontechnical Linux Foundation chief, who equates Microsoft critics with people who kick puppies) has a history working with several companies that are closely connected to Microsoft (not just Bakkt); can that be reconciled as not a conflict of interest?



  21. The 'Original' Linus Torvalds on Self-Hosting

    The fast-aging founder of Linux spoke as shown above (2005); so much has changed since then…



  22. IRC Proceedings: Friday, May 13, 2022

    IRC logs for Friday, May 13, 2022



  23. Links 13/05/2022: NetworkManager 1.38 and Pseudo-Security

    Links for the day



  24. Links 13/05/2022: GCC 12 Becoming Default Compiler in Tumbleweed

    Links for the day



  25. Links 13/05/2022: End of 'About BSD'

    Links for the day



  26. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, May 12, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, May 12, 2022



  27. Links 12/05/2022: AlmaLinux OS 8.6 and LibreOffice 7.2.7

    Links for the day



  28. [Meme] Yes, Minister, Yes!

    We’re meant to think that patents — not sharing — are going to save the world



  29. Central Staff Committee of the EPO Reminds the EPO's Management, Yet Again, That It is Breaking Laws

    Sinking quality of European Patents, plus a Patent Granting Process that is not compliant with the law, quite likely mean the EPO drives straight into a wall; the Central Staff Committee is still trying to save the institution, but management is uncaring and unresponsive (these people typically serve a term and leave, so they couldn’t care less about the long-term viability of their employer)



  30. Formalities Officers Team Managers at the European Patent Office Consider Stepping Down

    Formalities Officers Team Managers at Europe's second-largest institution face a growing list of issues; some are even "considering stepping down," according to internal documents


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts