Posted in Deception, Europe, Patents at 1:40 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
“Media partners” = corruptible media that one pays for

This was published by the EPO’s “media partner” just before the vote on Britain’s membership in the EU
Summary: The Liar in Chief, Benoît Battistelli, still lives in a fantasy world or simply lies intentionally, which would be worse
SOFTWARE developers in the UK (I’m one of them) oppose the UPC, FFII might soon file a complaint to block it in Germany, and the FSFE protested against the EPO‘s granting of software patents less than a week ago. Also see “Challenging the ICT Patent Framework for Responsible Innovation”. There is an ongoing survey about it this month.
The EPO isn’t functioning and the UPC would not offer redemption; not only is this not happening but if magically enough it did happened, it would make things worse. European is already attracting a growing number of patent trolls (we gave some examples from the UK and Germany recently) and they are eager to use the UPC to cause even greater damage (see what the USPTO did to the American industry by assigning patents to trolls). Bristows even boasts about it and treats it like good news (it profits from that). In fact, responding to an older post from Bristows’ Annsley Merelle Ward, someone wrote last night: “Added matter has long been a powerful attack at the EPO, who take things strictly. Therefore any patent attorney would naturally consider an added-matter attack. If there is a trend in added-matter attacks in national litigation, is this a result of more patent attorney involvement? e.g alternative business structures? or patent attorney litigators?”
It ought to be widely agreed by now that the UPC is desirable to almost nobody. Except the people who crafted the UPCA (agreement)… firms like Bristows, which keep lying about the UPC and censor comments that antagonise the UPC.
As one comment recently put it, “specialized patent-justice means extra patent-troubles. The court of eggs, will find eggs everywhere.”
Dr. Thomas Hirse and Paetrick Sakowski from CMS Hasche Sigle have just published this article titled “More bad news for the European Unitary Patent: The Federal Constitutional Court pro-visionally stops transposition laws”
It’s not bad news at all. It’s wonderful news.
The UPC is an enemy of European businesses and people, but not the enemy of firms like CMS Hasche Sigle, which markets itself across Germany (Leipzig, Stuttgart, Hamburg, Berlin, Duesseldorf and Frankfurt) for UPC-related services.
“In addition to the uncertainty caused by Brexit,” the authors admit, “exacerbated by the results of the 8 June 2017 General Election in the UK, this is another setback to the European Unitary Patent and the UPC. Just last week, on 7 June 2017, the Preparatory Committee for the UPC announced that the commencement date scheduled for December 2017 would be postponed once again; a new date has not yet been announced.”
Because they don’t know if it’ll ever happen. At all!
Meanwhile, however, the puff piece partners of Battistelli (EURACTIV) compose this hilarious piece about the UPC. Jorge Valero published this article that several readers already told us about yesterday (shortly after it had been published).
It certainly seems like Team Battistelli has wasted a fortune (of EPO budget, i.e. stakeholders’ money) trying to wash away/outnumber meaningful pieces about abuses/evilness. The mainstream press continues to ignore the real news and has instead been paid by the EPO to produce puff pieces about something called European Inventor Award (a misnomer). Valero’s piece is one of those pieces. To quote from it:
EU patent court to remain in London despite Brexit… for now
[This is nonsense. It technically cannot happen, so Battistelli has officially lost his mind or is maliciously lying]
[...]
“It is indispensable for the EU economy, and mainly for small and medium-sized companies and scientific centres,” said Benoît Battistelli, president of the European Patent Office (EPO), a non-EU body selected to manage the EU patent.
He spoke to reporters invited to follow the European Inventor Award that took place in Venice on 15 June.
The court will represent “an important step in the EU construction because, for the first time, there will be litigations among citizens”, he added.
Benoît Battistelli is a terrible liar. He has just lied to many scientists in an event where nobody in the crowd can stand up and challenge/refute him. That’s the kind of platform he feels comfortable with and “media partners” swallow all the lies and spew these out onto newspapers.
This year, for a change, we did not write much about European Inventor Award because we don’t wish to give it visibility, other than point out that a lot of the publicity is paid for and possibly ghostwritten by the EPO's PR firms. We did leak some material related to that. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Europe, Patents at 1:03 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Older listings may be out of date.
Summary: List of Heads of Delegation and their E-mail addresses (used to be public information before Benoît Battistelli’s oppressive regime or coup)
AL: Albania
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.dppm.gov.al/index1.php
Representative:
Mr Elvin LAKO, General Director
General Directorate of Patents and Trademarks
elvin.lako@dppm.gov.al
Alternate Representative:
Ms Elvanda MECE, Director of Examination Coordination and Training
General Directorate of Patents and Trademarks
elvanda.mece@dppm.gov.al
AT: Austria
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.patentamt.at/
Representative:
Frau Mariana KAREPOVA, Präsidentin
Österreichisches Patentamt
Mariana.Karepova@patentamt.at
Alternate Representative:
Frau Andrea SCHEICHL, Vizepräsidentin
Österreichisches Patentamt
Andrea.Scheichl@patentamt.at
BE: Belgium
Industrial Property Office:
http://economie.fgov.be/opri-die.jsp?
Representative:
M. Jérôme DEBRULLE, Conseiller général
Office de la Propriété Intellectuelle, Service Public Fédéral Economie, P.M.E., Classes moyennes et Energie
jerome.debrulle@economie.fgov.be
Alternate Representative:
M. Geoffrey BAILLEUX, Conseiller
Office de la Propriété Intellectuelle, Service Public Fédéral Economie, P.M.E., Classes moyennes et Energie
geoffrey.bailleux@mineco.fgov.be
BG: Bulgaria
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.bpo.bg/
Representative:
Mr Petko NIKOLOV, President
Patent Office of the Republic of Bulgaria
pnikolov@bpo.bg
Alternate Representative:
Mr Dimitar ILIEV, Head, International Co-operation Department
Patent Office of the Republic of Bulgaria
CH: Switzerland
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.ige.ch/
Representative:
Herr Roland GROSSENBACHER, Vertreter der Schweiz im Verwaltungsrat der EPO
Eidgenössisches Institut für Geistiges Eigentum
roland.grossenbacher@ipi.ch
Alternate Representative:
Herr Alban FISCHER, Vizedirektor und Leiter der Patentabteilung
Eidgenössisches Institut für Geistiges Eigentum
CY: Cyprus
Industrial Property Office: http://www.mcit.gov.cy/mcit/drcor/drcor.nsf/index_en/index_en?opendocument
Representative:
Mr Spyros KOKKINOS, Registrar of Companies & Official Receiver
Ministry of Energy, Commerce, Industry & Tourism
skokkinos@drcor.mcit.gov.cy
Alternate Representative:
Ms Stalo PAPAIOANNOU, Senior Officer of Registrar of Companies and Official Receiver
Ministry of Energy, Commerce, Industry & Tourism
CZ: Czech Republic
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.upv.cz/
Representative:
Mr Josef KRATOCHVÍL, President
Industrial Property Office of the Czech Republic
jkratochvil@upv.cz
Alternate Representative:
Ms Svĕtlana KOPECKÁ, Director of the International Department
Industrial Property Office of the Czech Republic
skopecka@upv.cz
DE: Germany
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.dpma.de/index.htm
Representative:
Herr Christoph ERNST, Ministerialdirigent
Bundesministerium der Justiz
ernst-ch@bmjv.bund.de
Alternate Representative:
Frau Cornelia RUDLOFF-SCHÄFFER, Präsidentin
Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt
DK: Denmark
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.dkpto.dk/
Representative:
Mr Jesper KONGSTAD, Director General
Danish Patent and Trademark Office
Alternate Representative:
Ms Anne REJNHOLD JØRGENSEN, Director, Policy & Legal Affairs
Danish Patent and Trademark Office
arj@dkpto.dk
EE: Estonia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.epa.ee/
Representative:
Mr Margus VIHER, Director General
Estonian Patent Office
Margus.Viher@epa.ee
Alternate Representative:
Ms Elle MARDO, Head of the Patent Department
Estonian Patent Office
Elle.Mardo@epa.ee
ES: Spain
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.oepm.es/
Representative:
Ms Patricia GARCÍA-ESCUDERO MÁRQUEZ, Director General
Spanish Patent and Trademark Office
patricia.garcia-escudero@oepm.es
Alternate Representative:
Mr Pedro CARTAGENA ABELLA, Senior Adviser
Spanish Patent and Trademark Office
pedro.cartagena@oepm.es
FI: Finland
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.prh.fi/
Representative:
Mr Antti RIIVARI, Director General
Finnish Patent and Registration Office
antti.riivari@prh.fi
Alternate Representative:
Mr Jorma HANSKI, Director, Patents and Innovations Line
Finnish Patent and Registration Office
jorma.hanski@prh.fi
FR: France
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.inpi.fr/
Representative:
M. Romain SOUBEYRAN, Directeur général
Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle
Alternate Representative:
M. Philippe CADRE, Directeur de la propriété industrielle
Institut National de la Propriété Industrielle (INPI)
GB: United Kingdom
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.ipo.gov.uk/
Representative:
Mr Tim MOSS, Chief Executive and Comptroller General
Intellectual Property Office
tim.moss@ipo.gov.uk
Alternate Representative:
Mr Sean DENNEHEY, Deputy Chief Executive
Intellectual Property Office
Sean.Dennehey1@ipo.gov.uk
GR: Greece
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.obi.gr/
Representative:
Mr Ioannis KAPLANIS, Director General
Industrial Property Organisation (OBI)
ikap@obi.gr
Alternate Representative:
Mr Ioannis BOUMPARIS, Deputy Director General
Industrial Property Organisation (OBI)
HR: Republika Hrvatska
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.dziv.hr/
Representative:
Ms Ljiljana KUTEROVAC, Director General
State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia
ljiljana.kuterovac@dziv.hr
Alternate Representative:
Ms Ana Rački MARINKOVIĆ, Deputy Director General
State Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Croatia
HU: Hungary
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.hipo.gov.hu/
Representative:
Mr Viktor ŁUSZCZ, President
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
Alternate Representative:
Mr Szabolcs FARKAS, Vice-President for Technical Affairs
Hungarian Intellectual Property Office
szabolcs.farkas@hipo.gov.hu
IE: Ireland
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.patentsoffice.ie/
Representative:
Mr Gerard BARRETT, Controller
Irish Patents Office
gerard.barrett@patentsoffice.ie
Alternate Representative:
N.N.
IS: Iceland
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.patent.is/
Representative:
Ms Borghildur ERLINGSDÓTTIR, Director General
Icelandic Patent Office
borghildur@els.is
Alternate Representative:
Ms Elfa Íshólm ÓLAFSDÓTTIR, Head of Finance and Operation Division
Icelandic Patent Office
IT: Italy
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.uibm.gov.it/
Representative:
Mr Mauro MASI, Delegate for Intellectual Property
Directorate General for Global Affairs
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
mauro.masi@consap.it
Alternate Representative:
Mme Loredana GULINO, Director General
General Directorate for the fight against counterfeiting – Italian Office for Patents and Trademarks
Ministry for Economic Development
loredana.gulino@mise.gov.it
LI: Liechtenstein
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.avw.llv.li/immaterialgueterrecht
Representative:
Frau Ute HAMMERMANN, Abteilung Recht
Amt für Volkswirtschaft
Ute.Hammermann@llv.li
Alternate Representative:
Frau Esther SCHINDLER, Diplomatische Mitarbeiterin
Amt für Auswärtige Angelegenheiten
Esther.Schindler@llv.li
LT: Lithuania
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.vpb.lt/
Representative:
Mr Arūnas ŽELVYS, Director
State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania
arunas.zelvys@vpb.gov.lt
Alternate Representative:
Mr Žilvinas DANYS, Deputy Director
State Patent Bureau of the Republic of Lithuania
zilvinas.danys@vpb.gov.lt
LU: Luxembourg
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.eco.public.lu/
Representative:
M. Lex KAUFHOLD, Conseiller de direction 1ère classe
Chargé de direction, Office de la propriété intellectuelle
Ministère de l’Economie et du Commerce extérieur
lex.kaufhold@eco.etat.lu
Alternate Representative:
M. Claude SAHL, Chef du secteur “Législation”
Office de la propriété intellectuelle
Ministère de l’Economie et du Commerce extérieur
claude.sahl@eco.etat.lu
LV: Latvia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.lrpv.lv/index.php?lang=EN
Representative:
Mr Sandris LAGANOVSKIS, Director
Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia
sandris.laganovskis@lrpv.gov.lv
Alternate Representative:
Mr Guntis RAMĀNS, Director of the Department of Examination of Inventions
Patent Office of the Republic of Latvia
guntis.ramans@lrpv.gov.lv
MC: Monaco
Representative:
M. Thomas LANTHEAUME, Directeur Adjoint
Direction de l’Expansion Economique
tlantheaume@gouv.mc
Alternate Representative:
M. Jean-Pierre SANTOS, Chef de Division, Division de la Propriété Intellectuelle
Direction de l’Expansion Economique
MK: Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.ippo.gov.mk/
Representative:
Mr Safet EMRULI, Director
State Office of Industrial Property
safet.emruli@ippo.gov.mk
Alternate Representative:
Mr Jetmir SHABANI, Head of Patent Section
State Office of Industrial Property
jetmir.shabani@ippo.gov.mk
MT: Malta
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.commerce.gov.mt/
Representative:
Mr Godwin WARR, Director General Commerce Department, Comptroller of Industrial Property
Ministry for the Economy, Investment and Small Business
godwin.warr@gov.mt
Alternate Representative:
Ms Michelle BONELLO, Director Industrial Property Registrations, Commerce Department
Ministry for the Economy, Investment and Small Business
michelle.bonello@gov.mt
NL: Netherlands
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.octrooicentrum.nl/
Representative:
Mr Derk-Jan DE GROOT, Director
Netherlands Patent Office
derk-jan.degroot@agentschapnl.nl
Alternate Representative:
Mr Paul VAN BEUKERING, Unit Manager
Ministry of Economic Affairs
p.h.m.vanbeukering@minez.nl
NO: Norge
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.patentstyret.no/
Representative:
Mr Per A. FOSS, Director General
Norwegian Industrial Property Office
pfo@patentstyret.no
Alternate Representative:
Mr Jostein SANDVIK, Director, Legal and International Affairs
Norwegian Industrial Property Office
jsa@patentstyret.no
PL: Poland
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.uprp.pl/
Representative:
Ms Alicja ADAMCZAK, President
Patent Office of the Republic of Poland
aadamczak@uprp.pl
Alternate Representative:
Ms Ewa NIZIŃSKA MATYSIAK, Director of the Cabinet of the President
Patent Office of the Republic of Poland
ematysiak@uprp.pl
PT: Portugal
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.inpi.pt/
Representative:
Mme Maria Leonor MENDES DA TRINDADE, President of the Directive Council
National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI)
leonor.trindade@inpi.pt
Alternate Representative:
Mr Marco DINIS, Member of the Directive Council
National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI)
marco.dinis@inpi.pt
RO: Romania
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.osim.ro/
Representative:
Ms Adriana ALDESCU, Director General a.i.
State Office for Inventions and Trademarks
Alternate Representative:
Mr Catalin NITU, Director Legal Department
State Office for Inventions and Trademarks
RS: Serbia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.zis.gov.rs/
Representative
Mr Vladimir MARIĆ, Acting Director
Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia
vmaric@zis.gov.rs
Alternate Representative:
Ms Mirjana JELIĆ, Assistant Director of the Patent Sector
Intellectual Property Office of the Republic of Serbia
SE: Sweden
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.prv.se/
Representative:
Ms Susanne ǺS SIVBORG, Director General
Swedish Patent and Registration Office
susanne.sivborg@prv.se
Alternate Representative:
Ms Karin BERGH, Chief Legal Counsel
Swedish Patent and Registration Office
karin.bergh@prv.se
SI: Slovenia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.uil-sipo.si/
Representative:
Mr Vojko TOMAN, Director
Slovenian Intellectual Property Office
vojko.toman@uil-sipo.si
Alternate Representative:
Ms Helena ZALAZNIK, Head of Patent Department
Slovenian Intellectual Property Office
h.zalaznik@uil-sipo.si
SK: Slovakia
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.indprop.gov.sk/
Representative:
Mr Richard MESSINGER, President
Industrial Property Office of the Slovak Republic
richard.messinger@indprop.gov.sk
Alternate Representative:
Ms Lukrécia MARČOKOVÁ, Directress, Patent Department
Industrial Property Office of the Slovak Republic
lukrecia.marcokova@indprop.gov.sk
SM: San Marino
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.usbm.sm/on-line/en/home.html
Representative:
Ms Silvia ROSSI, Director
State Office for Patents and Trademarks
silvia.rossi.ubm@pa.sm
Alternate Representative:
M. Bruno CINQUANTINI, Advisor
Secretariat of State for Industry, Handcraft and Commerce
State Office for Patents and Trademarks
TR: Turkey
Industrial Property Office:
http://www.turkpatent.gov.tr/
Representative:
Mr Habip ASAN, President
Turkish Patent and Trademark Office
habip.asan@turkpatent.gov.tr
Alternate Representative:
Mr Ibrahim YAŞAR, Vice President
Turkish Patent and Trademark Office
Permalink
Send this to a friend
Posted in Europe, Patents at 12:28 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz
Previous in this series: European Patent Office (EPO) Whistleblowing Guidelines
Summary: Advice on when to leak and what to leak for the desired effect, which is reformatory (though transparency and accountability)
THIS series, which deals with “Whistleblowing Guidelines” for the EPO, will come in four parts. Today, in the second part, we deal with motivation and impact. Think carefully what to leak before leaking, irrespective of the safety of the act of leaking. The goal is to repair the Office (the employer), not to destroy it, after all…
Unofficial EPO Circular no. 002
Whistleblowing Guidelines
for the staff of the European Patent Office
- part 2 -
Your Motivation
Whistleblowers have many different reasons for reporting misdeeds or leaking secret documents. Your personal reasons may include, for example, a general sense of justice, concern about the future of the Organisation, disgust of some appalling behaviour you witnessed, or even a wish for revenge.
Whatever your personal motivation is, please be honest to yourself. Don’t be self-righteous, don’t confound base motives with heroism. Once you are certain about your feelings and your goals, and that your motivation is a valid one, you can proceed.
The potential impact of the leak
Consider carefully what the impact of the leaked document will be. If individuals exposed would be humiliated without any perspective of improvement of the situation, your action might rather do harm than good. But if a revelation could trigger National criminal investigations, even with delay, or if it could justify an internal prosecution, you would have a valid reason to take action.
Also consider how the leak will affect the organisation as a whole. The public image of the European Patent Organisation is likely to suffer – but it should be the wrong-doing exposed that causes the damage, not the exposure. Exposing wrong-doing should be done in the hope of putting an end to it. Will the public’s trust in the functioning of the Office, i.e. in the integrity and competence of its staff be shattered, or will misconduct of certain EPO top managers or delegates to the AC exposed, in the hope to put an end to it? Is the significance of the leaked documents obvious to an outsider, or can they be misinterpreted?
A leak could also cause internal damage, e.g. by destroying the trust among colleagues within a unit exposed in the leak.
Choose the recipient of your leak with care. Online media, newspapers, TV channels, weblogs, and politicians have in many cases acted upon EPO leaks. Certain blogs attract a high number of readers but may be perceived as little credible by some. Some classical media may refuse to act, others will investigate carefully first before reporting. If you contact politicians of your host or home country, it is usually best to contact members of parliament, or possibly embassadors, as ministers are generally too occupied to take note, and local or regional governments do not have enough influence to tackle an international organisation.
If the documents are likely not to have an impact at all, there is no reason to leak them. And never leak false information! Credibility is a whistleblower’s most valuable asset.
As a word of caution, never leak anything to (or even speak to) IAM. They burn sources.
The next part is already in preparation. Part 4 will take more time to produce as it’s be more technical. █
Permalink
Send this to a friend