08.29.17

Gemini version available ♊︎

Virtually the Whole Technology Sector Supports PTAB, But Dennis Crouch Supports Patent Trolls and Bullies Instead

Posted in America, Deception, Patents at 10:31 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

When it comes to patent maximalism, the worst (for reputation) Conservative think tanks [1, 2, 3] including the Heritage Foundation and Dennis Crouch are on the same side

Heritage Foundation
Reference: Heritage Foundation

Summary: A radical patent policy which encourages deregulation and lack of patent quality assurance is being embraced by Patently-O, which has joined the lobby against the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

THE US patent system has been improving, but all the improvements are constantly under threat. We need eternal vigilance because quality of patents isn’t what the patent ‘industry’ strives for. Its economic motivations mean that infinite patent grants on any conceivable concept would be grand! It mirrors the activity of the copyright ‘industry’.

As covered here last night and on Sunday, Andrei Iancu might be the next USPTO Director and his track record gives reasons for concern. He’s part of that same pool of patent maximalists that trolls come from. Patent maximalists from Managing IP wrote about it today (or last night). To quote directly what the White House said (it has been known since Friday when there was a late night announcements dump): “Andrei Iancu of California, to be Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property {sic} and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Department of Commerce.”

“He’s effectively siding with patent trolls and other malicious actors.”Remember the role played by Dennis Crouch when there was a witch-hunt against Michelle Lee. It paved the way to this. On many occasions earlier this month we wrote about Dennis Crouch’s meddling. It’s not the meddling itself that bothers us the most but the side taken by Crouch. He’s effectively siding with patent trolls and other malicious actors. He wants to see PTAB destroyed (or its authority profoundly limited). He has been doing a lot of that so far this year, but recently it became a lot more frequent. Here, in a post from yesterday, one can see Dennis Crouch boosting anti-PTAB arguments, removing pretenses of impartiality. Is he still an academic or just a trolls’ lobbyist these days? Going more than two centuries back (and sometimes making errors, which he later publicly admits), he say that his “basic argument is historic — Inventors had a right to a trial by jury prior to 1791; those rights were guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment of the US Constitution; and Congress cannot now eliminate those established rights.”

AIA passed 6 years ago. Why has he not complained until now? On the very same day Dennis Crouch continued his long attack on the reputation of PTAB (echoing tactics from Watchtroll) in order to help patent trolls and other radical elements. It’s like he’s trying to suggest that PTAB is corrupt, in effect insulting the judges like Watchtroll habitually does.

Ultratec’s patents relate to systems for facilitating phone calls for deaf people. In eight parallel IPR proceedings, the PTAB found the challenged claims anticipated and/or obvious. On appeal, the Federal Circuit has vacated – holding that “the Board failed to consider material evidence and failed to explain its decisions to exclude the evidence.” As you might expect, the panel of Judges Newman, Linn, and Moore held the PTAB’s feet to the fire.

To us, as an independent site, it’s rather sickening to see what academia in the US has become, with some professors turning into patent maximalists and it’s clear for whose benefit. Even judge-bashing seems to be flirted with. Maybe Crouch has been receiving E-mails from people with a grudge and is thus acting as their courier. Whatever it is, what sort of patent academic seriously believes that patent quality (or quality assurance) is something to be challenged rather than supported? Every other patent academic seems to be on the other side of the argument, so is Crouch becoming somewhat of a “crank” here? Historically, the battle over patent scope was waged between greedy/corporate interests and academia; it’s clear which side was protectionist and which one was rational. If Crouch has decided to crouch under the bridge with the trolls, we have no choice but to point it out. This past month alone, for example, Patently-O was reduced to little more than a PTAB-bashing blog. The mask totally slipped off.

“This past month alone, for example, Patently-O was reduced to little more than a PTAB-bashing blog.”While Dennis Crouch protects patent trolls and bullies, it’s actually large corporations that now express support for PTAB. But not the nefarious front groups. “Patent reform is critical to protecting American inventors,” says the headline of this new column at The Hill, composed by Alden Abbott of the Heritage Foundation, in support of the anti-PTAB STRONGER Patent Act of 2017 (Crouch focuses on a Supreme Court case pertaining to PTAB). It’s very strongly in favour of abolishing PTAB, i.e. an anti-reform ‘reform’. To quote:

Throughout American history, patents have been key to making the United States the world’s leader in innovation. They have spurred the development of the telegraph, the telephone, electrical systems, automobiles, aviation, computers, smartphones, and numerous life-saving drugs.

But recent changes in U.S. patent law threaten to dethrone the United States as the world’s technology leader — and slow American economic growth.

Federal patent law has long granted American inventors a limited time right — currently 20 years from the date a patent application is filed – “to exclude others from making, using offering for sale, or selling” their novel inventions. Subject to certain conditions, the U.S. Patent Office must grant a patent to an applicant who “invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.” This language on its face provides broad authorization for the grant of patents.

[...]

Patent experts (including leading judges, scholars, practitioners, and former PTO heads) have pointed out that PTAB’s record of overturning the vast bulk of patents presented for review is far out of line with historic rates of patent reversals by the courts. That high reversal rate, those experts say, shows that the PTAB process is seriously defective.

PTAB rulings have been a particular blow to small inventors, whose ability to attract seed capital to promote their innovative ventures is being seriously threatened.

When Heritage Foundation staff says “small inventors” it actually means patent trolls and sometimes large aggressors (may be be non-practicing) that shake down many of their small rivals. But don’t let facts get in the way; hey, it’s the Heritage Foundation — the very antithesis of facts and opponent of reality. Isn’t it funny that the Heritage Foundation basically cites patent maximalists to give the illusion of PTAB hostility? The vast majority of practitioners and the public support PTAB.

“When Heritage Foundation staff says “small inventors” it actually means patent trolls and sometimes large aggressors (may be be non-practicing) that shake down many of their small rivals.”Remember that PTAB does not just invalidate any patent; it specifically targets patents that should never have been granted in the first place. So what’s wrong with that? Those who like to stroke their ego over charts that show infinite growth in patents (accelerated rate of growth) aren’t happy about it. Crouch might need to change career or reassess his views of patents. Many of his colleagues and fellow academics do not agree with him; they write many papers about patents going overboard and harming the US economy.

In simple terms, PTAB means less money for trolls. Abolishing PTAB would mean their resurgence.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Links 18/05/2022: Qt Company Loses Chief; OpenSUSE Leap Micro 5.2 and RHEL 9 Final

    Links for the day



  2. Jim Zemlin's Wife is Funded by Puppies (Microsoft)

    Jim Zemlin — like his wife — is bagging millions from Microsoft, but that’s clearly a conflict of interest for the Linux Foundation



  3. Links 18/05/2022: More Defections From WordPress to Gemini

    Links for the day



  4. Links 18/05/2022: PikaScript and cURL's Annual User Survey

    Links for the day



  5. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, May 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, May 17, 2022



  6. Phoronix: Microsoft and Phoronix Sponsor (and Close Microsoft Partner) AMD All Over the Place

    When you’re taking massive 'gifts' from AMD (and also some from Microsoft) maybe it’s not surprising that editorial decisions change somewhat…



  7. EPO Has No F-ing Oversight

    Earlier today SUEPO mentioned this new article demonstrating that EPO President António Campinos can very obviously and blatantly violate the Code of Conduct of the Office without facing any consequences; there are translations too, so the report is now available in four languages



  8. [Meme] Linux-Rejecting Foundation

    The Linux Foundation never really leads by example; by default, it uses proprietary software



  9. Linux Foundation Almost Never uses Open Source

    The Linux Foundation uses proprietary software (look where they hire and take money from) and be sure they're probably not even aware of it



  10. Links 17/05/2022: Many More Games on GNU/Linux, YaST Development Report

    Links for the day



  11. Links 17/05/2022: Rocky Linux 8.6 and Budgie Desktop in Fedora

    Links for the day



  12. Patent Examiners Rising Up Against EPO Abuse

    Unhappy with the law-breaking autocracy (the EPO‘s management breaks the law as a matter of routine), fast-deteriorating working conditions and rapidly-decreasing quality of work (or lack of compliance with the law), workers have escalated further, topping off strikes and industrial actions with a large-scale petition



  13. [Meme] What Managers (Really) Mean by Acting Professionally

    The myth of 'professionalism' needs to die along with the façade of conformity as prerequisite for employment (Linus Torvalds can work just fine in a bathrobe in his own home)



  14. Internal Poll: 93% of European Patent Office (EPO) Workers Are Unhappy With the EPO

    On top of strike/s and industrial action/s there are now also petitions; at the EPO, almost all staff is "disgruntled" because of utterly corrupt and defunct leadership



  15. Links 17/05/2022: OpenSUSE Leap 15.4 Release Candidate

    Links for the day



  16. IRC Proceedings: Monday, May 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, May 16, 2022



  17. Links 16/05/2022: FreeBSD 13.1 and Inkscape 1.2 Released

    Links for the day



  18. Archiving Latest Posts in Geminispace (Like a Dated Web Directory But for Gemini)

    Earlier today we saw several more people crossing over from the World Wide Web to Gemini; we're trying to make a decent aggregator and archive for the rapidly-expanding Geminispace, which will soon have 2,500 capsules that are known to Lupa alone



  19. Microsoft Vidal Does Not Want to Listen (USPTO is Just for Megacorporations)

    Microsoft Vidal knows her real bosses. They’re international corporations (multinationals like Microsoft), not American people.



  20. Links 16/05/2022: China Advances on GNU/Linux and Maui 2.1.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  21. Jim Zemlin: Chief Revenue Officer in 'Linux' Seat-Selling Foundation

    Board seats in the Linux Foundation are basically a product on sale, based internal documents



  22. Reminder: Linux Foundation's Last IRS Filing is Very Old (Same Year the CFO Left)

    People really need to ask the Linux Foundation, directly, why its filings are years behind; this seems like a sensitive subject



  23. Linux Foundation Does Not Speak for GNU/Linux Users

    There's a serious problem in the "Linux" world as the so-called 'Linux' Foundation claims to speak for us (the GNU/Linux community) while in fact speaking against us (on the payroll of those looking to extinguish us)



  24. IBM's Lennart Poettering on Breaking Software for Pseudo Novelty

    Recently-uploaded ELCE 2011 clip shows a panel with Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Thomas Gleixner, Paul McKenney, and Lennart Poettering (relevant to novelty or perceived novelty that mostly degrades the experience of longtime users, e.g. Wayland and systemd)



  25. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, May 15, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, May 15, 2022



  26. Links 15/05/2022: Linux 5.18 RC7 and Calls for More Mass Surveillance

    Links for the day



  27. Audio: Mark Shuttleworth Marketed to Young Males, With Sexy Pictures

    The Web is rotting away, old links become broken links within months or years, so I’ve decided to encode a 3-minute segment of the whole as Ogg



  28. What a Difference Half a Decade Makes (When Linux Foundation is 'Having Fun')

    Media shaming campaigns may have taken their toll on the founder of Linux, who is now bossed by someone who rejects Linux and is married to a Microsoft booster. Like Richard Stallman under FSF guidance (and conditions for return, mostly for fear of further media assaults and attack dogs), he has become a more publicity-shy and private person. The Linux Foundation has in effect reduced the founder of what it’s called after (Linux) into a weekly release manager and mascot, whose brand it is gradually diluting/cheapening.



  29. Links 15/05/2022: GNU libiconv 1.17

    Links for the day



  30. [Meme] Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC) Cannot Be Reconciled With the Law

    Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court (UPC)? Impossible. But Team UPC counts on an endless torrent of fake news managing to convince you (and more importantly politicians) otherwise.


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts