European Patent Office (EPO) Implements Erdoğan-Style or Ottoman-Like Purge for King Battistelli

Posted in Europe, Patents at 5:16 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Ottoman Empire

Summary: In an effort to shield himself from criticism and enable more nepotism/succession, King Battistelli now eliminates Directors who are viewed as not sufficiently loyal (or tolerant of his many abuses)

“Is something rotten at the State of EPO” is the question sent to us this morning along with some inside information about the European Patent Office.

“They still, for example, pretend that the EPO is a desirable employer.”This relates to something we wrote earlier this month about “how to rebuild DG1 based on trusted managers,” as our source put it.

“It exists a (of course non-official) white and a black list, with some directors moving from one list to the other to have the new DG1 structure ready for 1st January 2018.

“On the black list: all DG1 Directors considered too close to Staff Reps/SUEPO and those who refused to sign the pathetic support letter to the President (which the rumour has it was organised under ex-VP1 Minnoye by the zealot Principal Director Roberta Romano-Götsch, always prone to witch hunt for her masters).”

We wrote a lot about that at the time.

Our source continues: “On the white list: brave sheep ready to sell their (non-existing) soul since they have no respect (not even for themselves).”

Welcome to the ‘new’ EPO. It’s a shadow of its former self, still mesmerised by — and fantasising about — the “old glory”. If Battistelli surrounds himself with enough “yes men” who are cowards and won’t tell him the truth, he might even believe that he has been successful. They still, for example, pretend that the EPO is a desirable employer. We will say more about it in our next post.

European Patent Office in Shambles and the EU’s Brexit Position Paper Suggests UPC is Off the Agenda

Posted in Europe, Patents at 4:54 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

UPC in binSummary: The stressful situation at the EPO is having a knock-on effect on the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which now lacks the support needed for ratification (Unitary Patent means patent chaos, extortionate trolls, and litigation with low-quality patents)

“The European Patent Office prioritizes the applications from large multinationals over smaller European businesses,” says Soylent News (millions of readers there), referring to something we exposed in a leak almost 2 years ago. A reader told us that the media is now speaking about it. Better late than never. “Another large point of contention caused by the EPO is their granting of software patents in direct violations of the European Patent Convention (EPC),” it added.

It has now been over three years since the EPO ‘saga’ began. Things have gone sharply downhill since then. As for the UPC, well… it’s dying along with Team Battistelli, which is in disarray as Battistelli desperately shuffles the seats at the deck of a sinking ship, including the new Captain (only days left — 4 to be precise — for applicants to pursue presidency). We still have a long series on its way. It will show some (or expose, even reveal) things related to this.

“Everything we have seen so far in the UPC as been nefarious, full of lies, sometimes even aggressive. So we’re no longer surprised.”The UPC is dead here; even its biggest fans, such as IAM, say that the “EU IP and Brexit position paper has been published. It’s short and makes no mention of the UPC.”

IAM later wrote: “The UK justifies ratification of UPC agreement on the basis it is not an EU institution. No mention of it in the EC paper confirms that.”

I responded with: “Source missing? The latest UK-IPO report says nothing of that kind. At all.”

We wrote at least 2 articles to rebut that. UPC spinners (like Bristows and Managing IP) try to paint a report that says nothing about UPC as something about UPC. Bristows went way too far in this trajectory, so it’s not impossible that IAM got bamboozled by them.

“There’s no “rest of it”; it just doesn’t mention the UPC because it’s off the agenda, at least for now.”Everything we have seen so far in the UPC as been nefarious, full of lies, sometimes even aggressive. So we’re no longer surprised.

Responding to IP Kat‘s article about the EU ‘IP’ [sic] and Brexit position paper, someone wrote: “Am I the only person thinking “where’s the rest of it?”

There’s no “rest of it”; it just doesn’t mention the UPC because it’s off the agenda, at least for now. Consider what’s happening in Germany, the country most critical (central) to the UPC. We shall revisit that subject later.

« Previous Page « Previous Page Next entries »

RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channels: Come and chat with us in real time

New to This Site? Here Are Some Introductory Resources




Samba logo

We support

End software patents


GNU project


EFF bloggers

Comcast is Blocktastic? SavetheInternet.com

Recent Posts