10.26.17

Gemini version available ♊︎

The EPO is Breaking the Law and Its Employees Cannot Speak About It (Updated)

Posted in Europe, Law, Patents at 3:30 am by Dr. Roy Schestowitz

Like popes who suppress information about abuse

Benoît Battistelli at UIMPSummary: A truly extraordinary situation at the EPO, where laws are being violated in the name of so-called ‘production’ and truth is treated as “defamation” and attacked vehemently

SUEPO has just, for the first time in fact, mentioned denial of holidays by the EPO. We have been writing about it since early September and now there is this text about it in German [PDF].

SUEPO refers to it in English as “Abolishment of German National Public Holidays at the European Patent Office. Kurzgutachten zu den Rechtsfragen – For more information, read here. (German) The Europea [sic] Patent Office above national law.” It says this while referring to this page from the site of the EPO. (warning: epo.org links may be a privacy risk)

Surely the staff is extremely upset about this. Some people thought about actions they might take, such as not showing up or demanding double pay for that day. Since the EPO cannot be sued (immunity), Battistelli will quite likely get away with it. He intends to do this again and again (3 times at least) and not because it’s some critical situation like missed deadlines; his right-hand bulldog has already admitted that this is all about increasing so-called ‘production’ (i.e. granting more low-quality patents, faster). But perhaps what’s most horrible about this is that staff is unable to speak out against it. The media isn’t listening and when comments are posted they get deleted. As someone (John) put it in our comments a few minutes ago:

The ipkat article reads (cite):
“The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office.”
The man who has not even taken office can only be Campinos. I don’t remember any particular comments about Campinos in the comments, do you?

There is a similar comment about it in Kluwer Patent Blog. To quote:

We now know that the deletion of comments on the IPKat thread was deliberate:

http://ipkitten.blogspot.co.uk/2017/10/ipkat-comment-moderation-policy_25.html

We are reminded that EPO-related comments on IPKat must follow strict rules. However, it is immensely disappointing (to say the least) no attempt was made to remove only those comments that transgressed the rules.

As to whether it is correct for Merpel to assert that “The overwhelming majority of comments were purely libellous ad hominem attacks on a man that has not even taken office”, readers can judge for themselves:

http://techrights.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/censored-by-ipkat.pdf

By my count, a total of 3 (out of 34) comments could reasonably be characterised as referring to “the character, motive, or other attribute” of Mr Campinos. Of those, only two go in any way beyond mere mention of facts regarding his background… and, in any event, seem pretty mild by the standards of blog posts even in the civilised world of IP. So, not quite an “overwhelming majority” of problematic comments, then? Unless, of course, you believe that a 6% level of (mild) “opinion-based” comments qualifies as such.

So, it seems that we are back to my initial comment – that strange things are indeed afoot in the world of (reporting on) the EPO.

“Amazing indeed,” Dr. Thorsten Bausch called it. Bausch has been brave enough to say the truth, using his own real name.

The above is based on a PDF of a printout, which we published before IP Kat was forced to admit that it had censored all the comments. Watch this comment from yesterday (posted in another context in IP Kat): “My comment was not really that serious, as it was really intended to establish whether all of my comments (as opposed to just those relating to the EPO) were getting “censored”.”

The context of this comment was a discussion which involves the EPC — something which Battistelli neither respects nor follows (just as he flagrantly violates national laws and disregards holidays). The latest comment mentions the EPC explicity:

Well, I read the decision, and it appears logical, but have one overrding question, and I hope somebody can answer it.

In 3.1.1.3 it says ‘The successor in title ….must prove that it indeed owned…’

It is especially the requirement TO PROVE that bothers me. Where does this come from. What is its basis under the EPC? I don’t see it.

If both the original owner and the successor in title certify that the transfer was effected on date X, to their satisfaction, and in a form which they found acceptable, what is the basis for a third party, or EPO, to doubt an effective transfer, and where is their basis to require proof.

As a summary this decision is nice…but still, I’d like to have seen a legal basis for the right of others to demand PROOF.

Well, lawlessness is the new norm and lawfulness at the EPO is a thing of the past. Get used to it or do something about it. It’s the EPC which granted the EPO powers to give (and profit from) patents; these powers are now being grossly misused. Revoke it.

As a lot of the media has been compromised (using money and threats) it’s hard to know what’s true about the EPO and UPC. Using soothing terms like “balance”, professional journalists (i.e. salaried to follow their publisher’s agenda) they often repeat lies from the EPO and habitually ignore the voices of EPO employees. This has been going on for years. This is why we have been so eager to write about the subject.

Update: SUEPO has just self-censored the above (could be due to threats or something else), so we are making a local copy of the PDF.

Share in other sites/networks: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Reddit
  • email

Decor ᶃ Gemini Space

Below is a Web proxy. We recommend getting a Gemini client/browser.

Black/white/grey bullet button This post is also available in Gemini over at this address (requires a Gemini client/browser to open).

Decor ✐ Cross-references

Black/white/grey bullet button Pages that cross-reference this one, if any exist, are listed below or will be listed below over time.

Decor ▢ Respond and Discuss

Black/white/grey bullet button If you liked this post, consider subscribing to the RSS feed or join us now at the IRC channels.

DecorWhat Else is New


  1. Computer Users Should be Operators, But Instead They're Being Operated by Vendors and Governments

    Computers have been turned into hostile black boxes (unlike Blackbox) that distrust the person who purchased them; moreover, from a legislative point of view, encryption (i.e. computer security) is perceived and treated by governments like a threat instead of something imperative — a necessity for society’s empowerment (privacy is about control and people in positions of unjust power want total and complete control)



  2. Peak Code — Part I: Before the Wars

    Article/series by Dr. Andy Farnell: "in the period between 1960 and 2060 people had mistaken what they called "The Internet" for a communications system, when it had in fact been an Ideal and a Battleground all along - the site of the 100 years info-war."



  3. Links 21/1/2022: RISC-V Development Board and Rust 1.58.1

    Links for the day



  4. IRC Proceedings: Thursday, January 20, 2022

    IRC logs for Thursday, January 20, 2022



  5. Gemini Lets You Control the Presentation Layer to Suit Your Own Needs

    In Gemini (or the Web as seen through Gemini clients such as Kristall) the user comes first; it's not sites/capsules that tell the user how pages are presented/rendered, as they decide only on structural/semantic aspects



  6. The Future of Techrights

    Futures are difficult to predict, but our general vision for the years ahead revolves around more community involvement and less (none or decreased) reliance on third parties, especially monopolistic corporations, mostly because they oppress the population via the network and via electronic devices



  7. [Meme] UPC for CJEU

    When you do illegal things and knowingly break the law to get started with a “legal” system you know it’ll end up in tears… or the CJEU



  8. Links 20/1/2022: 'Pluton' Pushback and Red Hat Satellite 6.10.2

    Links for the day



  9. The Web is a Corporate Misinformation/Disinformation Platform, Biased Against Communities, Facts, and Science

    Misinformation/disinformation in so-called 'news' sites is a pandemic which spreads; in the process, the founder of GNU/Linux gets defamed and GNU/Linux itself is described as the problem, not the solution to the actual problems



  10. Links 20/1/2022: McKinsey Openwashing and Stable Kernels

    Links for the day



  11. IRC Proceedings: Wednesday, January 19, 2022

    IRC logs for Wednesday, January 19, 2022



  12. Links 20/1/2022: Linuxfx 11.1 WxDesktop 11.0.3 and FreeIPMI 1.6.9 Released

    Links for the day



  13. Links 19/1/2022: XWayland 22.1 RC1 and OnlyOffice 7.0 Release

    Links for the day



  14. Links 19/1/2022: ArchLabs 2022.01.18 and KDE's 15-Minute Bug Initiative

    Links for the day



  15. When Twitter Protects Abusers and Abuse (and Twitter's Sponsors)

    Twitter is an out-of-control censorship machine and it should be treated accordingly even by those who merely "read" or "follow" Twitter accounts; Twitter is a filter, not a news/media platform or even means of communication



  16. IRC Proceedings: Tuesday, January 18, 2022

    IRC logs for Tuesday, January 18, 2022



  17. Links 19/1/2022: Wine 7.x Era Begins and Istio 1.12.2 is Out

    Links for the day



  18. Another Video IBM Does Not Want You to Watch

    It seems very much possible that IBM (or someone close to IBM) is trying to purge me from Twitter, so let’s examine what they may be trying to distract from. As we put it 2 years ago, "Watson" is a lot more offensive than those supposedly offensive words IBM is working to purge; think about those hundreds of Red Hat workers who are black and were never told about ethnic purges of blacks facilitated by IBM (their new boss).



  19. What IBM Does Not Want You to Watch

    Let's 'Streisand it'...



  20. Good News, Bad News (and Back to Normal)

    When many services are reliant on the integrity of a single, very tiny MicroSD card you're only moments away from 2 days of intensive labour (recovery, investigation, migration, and further coding); we've learned our lessons and took advantage of this incident to upgrade the operating system, double the storage space, even improve the code slightly (for compatibility with newer systems)



  21. Someone Is Very Desperate to Knock My Account Off Twitter

    Many reports against me — some successful — are putting my free speech (and factual statements) at risk



  22. Links 18/1/2022: Deepin 20.4 and Qubes OS 4.1.0 RC4

    Links for the day



  23. Links 18/1/2022: GNOME 42 Alpha and KStars 3.5.7

    Links for the day



  24. IRC Proceedings: Monday, January 17, 2022

    IRC logs for Monday, January 17, 2022



  25. Links 17/1/2022: More Microsoft-Connected FUD Against Linux as Its Share Continues to Fall

    Links for the day



  26. The GUI Challenge

    The latest article from Andy concerns the Command Line Challenge



  27. Links 17/1/2022: digiKam 7.5.0 and GhostBSD 22.01.12 Released

    Links for the day



  28. IRC Proceedings: Sunday, January 16, 2022

    IRC logs for Sunday, January 16, 2022



  29. Links 17/1/2022: postmarketOS 21.12 Service Pack 1 and Mumble 1.4 Released

    Links for the day



  30. [Meme] Gemini Space (or Geminispace): From 441 Working Capsules to 1,600 Working Capsules in Just 12 Months

    Gemini space now boasts 1,600 working capsules, a massive growth compared to last January, as we noted the other day (1,600 is now official)


RSS 64x64RSS Feed: subscribe to the RSS feed for regular updates

Home iconSite Wiki: You can improve this site by helping the extension of the site's content

Home iconSite Home: Background about the site and some key features in the front page

Chat iconIRC Channel: Come and chat with us in real time

Recent Posts